Jason Miller wrote:
Got a very stupid question, I am trying to setup amanda client on a FreeBSD
4.9 server and I am getting the following error. dgram_recv: recvfrom()
failed: Socket operation on non-socket
Has anyone had experience with this? I am using ucspi-tcp instead of inetd
or xinetd. I
Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Got a very stupid question, I am trying to setup amanda client on a FreeBSD
4.9 server and I am getting the following error. dgram_recv: recvfrom()
failed: Socket operation on non-socket
Has anyone had experience with this? I am using ucspi-tcp instead
Ok I just setup a new server to test the port for amanda-client and I am
getting the same problem as my production box. I also installed the port for
xinetd to see if I could get it to work using it. It is a no-go, has anyone
setup the amanda-client from port on a FreeBSD 4.9 box? If so could you
Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok I just setup a new server to test the port for amanda-client and I am
getting the same problem as my production box. I also installed the port for
xinetd to see if I could get it to work using it. It is a no-go, has anyone
setup the amanda-client from
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 13:47, Jason Miller wrote:
Ok I just setup a new server to test the port for amanda-client and
I am getting the same problem as my production box. I also
installed the port for xinetd to see if I could get it to work
using it.
Hi Jason;
How are the file(s) for
Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The below is exactly what is in my xinetd.conf and I have added amanda to it
to my hosts.allow and to insure everything is good to go I went as far as
rebooting the machine.
Running amcheck with -c on the server might be another, more lightweight
way to
Also I do see with a netstat -an the following line
udp4 0 0 *.10080*.*
After installing the xinetd I got that far, client still times out. I am
running the amcheck -c DailySet1 from the server to test this BTW. No
firewall is on this box or on the server and its on
Ok I got it, I was making it way too hard again. Re-read the manual's triple
checked the configs, folders, permissions and rebooted the server and
everything is working now. Figured out there was two things incorrect in my
setup and they were. FreeBSD has to have operator:operator not amanda:disk
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:29:16PM -0500, Jason Miller wrote:
Also I do see with a netstat -an the following line
udp4 0 0 *.10080*.*
After installing the xinetd I got that far, client still times out. I am
running the amcheck -c DailySet1 from the server to test
Hi, Jason,
on Dienstag, 28. September 2004 at 22:18 you wrote to amanda-users:
JM Ok I got it, I was making it way too hard again. Re-read the manual's triple
JM checked the configs, folders, permissions and rebooted the server and
JM everything is working now. Figured out there was two things
Hello again, amanda-users and amanda-hackers,
found some time again to do some docs-formatting work.
Just pushed the current versions (html, pdf, ps.gz) online.
Could someone review this chgscsi-chapter? I have never used it, so I
would really like it if someone actually using and knowing
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 16:18, Jason Miller wrote:
Ok I got it, I was making it way too hard again. Re-read the
manual's triple checked the configs, folders, permissions and
rebooted the server and everything is working now. Figured out
there was two things incorrect in my setup and they
Yes you can rest assured I will stay part of this group and help out where I
can. It has been a serious learning curve for me going from my M$ tainted
background to straight *nux. Have converted most of our servers running
windows to a *nix OS and have since stopped working as much... LOL
Jason
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 17:33, Jason Miller wrote:
Yes you can rest assured I will stay part of this group and help out
where I can. It has been a serious learning curve for me going from
my M$ tainted background to straight *nux. Have converted most of
our servers running windows to a
You bet, got tired of the late night coffee runs!!
From: Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:38:22 +0200
To: Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Amanda Client
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Jason Miller wrote:
Yes you can rest assured I will stay part of this
Yes Winderz is evil!!! I run a Mac powerbook and ibook myself and converted
the other admins in my office to get one for there use as well... My goal of
world domination is 1 step closer...
From: Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers
Hi, Gene,
on Dienstag, 28. September 2004 at 23:31 you wrote to amanda-users:
GH Glad you got it going Jason. Now, could you stick around and tutor
GH the next BSD'er that needs help?
Have a look at
http://www.amanda.org/docs/systemnotes.html#id2438204
;-)
--
best regards,
Stefan
Stefan
Totally Cool, first time I have ever been put in for knowledge on official
docs.
Jason :-)
From: Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: oops!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:41:58 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Miller [EMAIL
Hi, Jason,
on Dienstag, 28. September 2004 at 23:44 you wrote to amanda-users:
JM Totally Cool, first time I have ever been put in for knowledge on official
JM docs.
I do what I can do.
If you dig up more ...
;-)
(Do you think the note would have helped you from the start?)
--
best
Hello Amanda users,
I'm trying to find out if amanda can meet our needs.
I've heard from many people, yeah, amanda is really great... except for
that whole doesnt-span-tapes thing.
Right now, we have a Hierachical Storage Management tool
(HSM), and a buncha custom hacked perl scripts, to do our
For my install, yes it would have sped the process up. The other suggestions
helped narrow down my searching as well as verify I wasn't miss reading the
docs. So for FreeBSD 4.9 atleast putting all the messages together would
be one nice FreeBSD 4.9 port install how-to. I did not find many docs or
I sent this From the wrong address initially, apologies if you
actually get it twice :(
My experience is with amanda, but I will be taking over a Bacula
installation in about a month when I change jobs, see
http://www.bacula.org/ Has anybody used Bacula and have any comments on
how it compares
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
Hello Amanda users,
I'm trying to find out if amanda can meet our needs.
I've heard from many people, yeah, amanda is really great... except for
that whole doesnt-span-tapes thing.
Right now, we have a Hierachical Storage
I think I just found out why most of my backups are going over the end
of the tape.
Here's a description of my setup:
*
Mon-Thu - Daily incremental with full level 0 backup every 7 runs
on a rotation of 10 tapes. Each incremental level is on a minimum
of two tapes in case of
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:45:17PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
I think I just found out why most of my backups are going over the end
of the tape.
Here's a description of my setup:
*
...
And they were all using the same holding disk with autoflush turned on.
I checked the files in
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:45:17PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
So I have set up different holding disk directories for each profile.
Is this documented anywhere?
I don't recall seeing it specified, but I've done it from the start.
/{w|w2|w3|u|u2}/dumps/amanda/config
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:36:31PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Does amanda have any type of variables in its config files? I already
have a common file referenced by the three amanda.conf files, as well as
a common disklist. I'm thinking of a $profile so that I can define the
holding disk,
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:36:31PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Does amanda have any type of variables in its config files? I already
have a common file referenced by the three amanda.conf files, as well as
a common disklist. I'm thinking of a $profile so that I can define
28 matches
Mail list logo
