Hi all,
I've had a search through the FAQ, generally on the 'net and through the
list archives, but I can't seem to find anyone else reporting similar
symptoms to me, so here I go with my first post to the list. If I've
made a mistake, please be gentle...
I have a Linux box at another site.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:59:13PM -, Mark Lidstone enlightened us:
*snipped for brevity*
Now, if I'm reading this right, it's saying that it's hit the end of a
20Gb tape at around the 5Gb mark. Here's what I think are the relevant
parts of my amanda.conf:
tapetype HP-DDS-4
define
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:59:13PM -, Mark Lidstone wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a search through the FAQ, generally on the 'net and through the
list archives, but I can't seem to find anyone else reporting similar
symptoms to me, so here I go with my first post to the list. If I've
made a
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 at 1:59pm, Mark Lidstone wrote
NOTES:
taper: tape Haslar12 kb 16875296 fm 5 writing file: No space left on
device
Now, if I'm reading this right, it's saying that it's hit the end of a
20Gb tape at around the 5Gb mark. Here's what I think are the relevant
parts
Hi all,
Thanks very much for the replies. It didn't occur to me to check
hardware compression.
One comment to make, though - I am using a holding disk, and currently
it's free space is greater than the amount of data being backed up, so
does this log look like something's going screwy there
Ooops. Answering my own question. I had a limit on the amount of space
to use on the holding disk - Just increased it, so that should sort it.
Righto, have turned off hardware compression (using mt -f /dev/nst0
compression 0), changed my tapetype (see below) and, as I said,
increased the size
On Monday 14 March 2005 08:59, Mark Lidstone wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a search through the FAQ, generally on the 'net and through
the list archives, but I can't seem to find anyone else reporting
similar symptoms to me, so here I go with my first post to the
list. If I've made a mistake,
I had some questions regarding tapecycle, and after reading the man
page and the doc (old and new), I think that they fall short on
describing what tapecycle should be set to. The minimum value of
tapecycle is well covered, but not the maximum value, and how
tapecycle should relate to the number
On Monday 14 March 2005 10:14, Mark Lidstone wrote:
Ooops. Answering my own question. I had a limit on the amount of
space to use on the holding disk - Just increased it, so that
should sort it.
Righto, have turned off hardware compression (using mt -f /dev/nst0
compression 0), changed my
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:37:11PM +, Bruce S. Skinner wrote:
My last dozen or so emails to amanda-users have gone into a black
hole, I'll try this from another network under another subject.
So let's try and walk (crawl?) before we run.
I've set things up with only one small disk
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
I had some questions regarding tapecycle, and after reading the man
page and the doc (old and new), I think that they fall short on
describing what tapecycle should be set to. The minimum value of
tapecycle is well covered, but not
11 matches
Mail list logo
