Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:04:42AM -0400, khalid maqsudi wrote:
>>
>>> Most solaris distro's default to system V version of make. That would be
great if you added it to the docs. Thank you.
[..]
> I'm not 100% sure (because I currently have not a
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:04:42AM -0400, khalid maqsudi wrote:
Yes, I had a hard time figuring this out and it was not anywhere on google.
Most solaris distro's default to system V version of make. That would be
great if you added it to the docs. Thank you.
Anyone got
--On June 23, 2005 3:50:57 PM -0400 Mitch Collinsworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
LTO, DLT, S-LTO, etc all have the huge advantage of the same physical
form factor. So 'upgrading' a DLT library to LTO, or S-LTO is just
adding/upgrading the tape
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Indeed -- the other person referred to the AIT-4 behavior as "DLT
syndrome". But isn't "variable speed write" different than "writing fill
bytes"? Does DLT8000 lose capacity when not writing as fast as it can?
Yes. Same idea. Tape spins at c
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
LTO, DLT, S-LTO, etc all have the huge advantage of the same physical form
factor. So 'upgrading' a DLT library to LTO, or S-LTO is just
adding/upgrading the tape drives in it. DLT (sometimes called Compactape IV)
has a long history and is a good r
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 at 6:17pm, James Marcinek wrote
> I've been supporting Amanda for a customer for about a year now. I currently
> have only used a single tape device as the client was leary about leaving any
> media onsite as well as the fact that it would require more involvment than
> just
>
--On June 23, 2005 6:17:26 PM + James Marcinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am looking recommendations for a tape library device that works well
with amanda. Right now the client is using 8mm tapes, so I'd be
interested in other feedback in regards to other types of media (LTO,
DLT, etc
Hello Everyone,
I've been supporting Amanda for a customer for about a year now. I currently
have only used a single tape device as the client was leary about leaving any
media onsite as well as the fact that it would require more involvment than just
switching out tapes as most are not too techni
Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:11:34PM -0700, Kevin Dalley wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matt Hyclak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:26:49PM -0700, Kevin Dalley enlightened us:
>> >> Thanks for the suggestion. Setting record to no seems li
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:01:05 -0400 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:39:02PM +0100, Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator
> wrote:
>> Hi PB
>>
>> I reverted back to ./var, ./tmp as you So suggested and added ./media to
>> the exclude list.
>>
>> I run amd
hey list,
It's my first time playing with Amanda and I've been working for the
past few days to setup one central amanda server on a linux box
(generic fedora 4, using stock Amanda + Samba rpms) to backup a single
directory on 30 or so wintel boxes. Basically where I'm at now is that
amcheck fails
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 09:31:25 -0400 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>>
>> >> ? gtar: ./media/cdrom: Cannot savedir: No medium found
>> [...]
>> >>| gtar: ./var/spool/postfix/public/showq: socket ignored
>> >
>>
>> N
Hi Thanks for the advise
I will monitor as suggested but worth the voyager.
Cheers All
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 12:01 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> ./var/tmp
> ./var/spool/postfix
> ./var/spool/cups
--
Unix/ Linux Systems Administrator
Chuck Amadi
The Surgical Material Testing Labor
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:39:02PM +0100, Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator
wrote:
> Hi PB
>
> I reverted back to ./var, ./tmp as you So suggested and added ./media to
> the exclude list.
>
> I run amdump and It looks like it's working accordingly as per the Dump
> Summary.
Starting to look goo
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 at 11:46am, Mitch Collinsworth wrote
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
> > Something else I heard on another mailing list:
> >
> > "However AIT-4 (unlike AIT-1 til -3) appears to write fill
> > bytes onto the tape if it's not fed with data quickly enough,
>
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Something else I heard on another mailing list:
"However AIT-4 (unlike AIT-1 til -3) appears to write fill
bytes onto the tape if it's not fed with data quickly enough,
thus wasting lots of capacity."
The person said they heard it somewhere an
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:10:55PM +0300, Leonid Shulov wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgraded my amanda to 2.4.5 version, and after that sometimes amanda
> do backup with lev0 without any tape to holding disk. This broke all my
> work order. Before I do full PC dump once a week at Saturday nightly,
> increment
Hi PB
I reverted back to ./var, ./tmp as you So suggested and added ./media to
the exclude list.
I run amdump and It looks like it's working accordingly as per the Dump
Summary.
Here's my output Sorry for the constant mails I now have a better
understanding on whats going on and by next week wil
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Anyone got a pointer to docs describing the difference
in gnu and sysv make? I wouldn't be surprised if some
gun stuff needed the features of gnu make, but I'm
always amazed how often gnu make doesn't seem to work
with older sysv makefiles.
Yes, this would be interesting an
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:04:42AM -0400, khalid maqsudi wrote:
> Yes, I had a hard time figuring this out and it was not anywhere on google.
> Most solaris distro's default to system V version of make. That would be
> great if you added it to the docs. Thank you.
>
Anyone got a pointer to doc
khalid maqsudi wrote:
Yes, I had a hard time figuring this out and it was not anywhere on google.
Most solaris distro's default to system V version of make. That would be
great if you added it to the docs. Thank you.
It's in the CVS already. I'll release a new online-html-version soon.
--
S
Thanks for the link, was not aware about that, just assumed it should be
backwards compatiable. Really likes AIT. Yeah, it definitly going to make
us think twice before upgrading.
Chen
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Chris Loken wrote:
BUT - my AIT-4 drive apparently can't even read AIT-3 tapes. Seems
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 at 10:34am, Mitch Collinsworth wrote
> Answer looks pretty clear from the charts here:
>
> http://b2b.sony.com/documents/category/storage/branded-tape/AIT_Drives/AIT-4/AITMedia_05.pdf
Good link -- thanks.
Something else I heard on another mailing list:
"However AIT-4 (unlik
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Chris Loken wrote:
BUT - my AIT-4 drive apparently can't even read AIT-3 tapes. Seems
mind-bogglingly stupid but my vendor assures me it's true (haven't dared to
try).
Anybody understand if this is an issue that's going to be resolved and, if
so, will it be in firmware
Yes, I had a hard time figuring this out and it was not anywhere on google.
Most solaris distro's default to system V version of make. That would be
great if you added it to the docs. Thank you.
-Khalid
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>
> >>? gtar: ./media/cdrom: Cannot savedir: No medium found
> [...]
> >>| gtar: ./var/spool/postfix/public/showq: socket ignored
> >
>
> Note that the error is not in the sockets (those lines are marked
> with a pipe-symbol as "normal"
Hi
Great News
I have included the ./media or be it ./media/cdrom and ./media/floppy I
will use the simpler format and run the amdump.
Cheers
Chuck
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 14:52 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
> > My fstab is as follows but when using Yast
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
My fstab is as follows but when using Yast and floppy I have had no
issues.
/dev/cdrom /media/cdrom subfs
fs=cdfss,ro,procuid,nosuid,nodev,exec,iocharset=utf8 0 0
/dev/fd0 /media/floppysubfs
fs=floppyfss,procuid,nodev
Hi
I am using SuSE SLES 9,version Amanda 2.4.2 and /etc/fstab.
Very weired I just mounted a floppy and cdrom with no problems
So it is working.
Cheers
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 13:03 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>/-- server / lev 0 FAILED [/bin/tar returned 2]
> >>
Hello, Chuck,
on 23.06.2005, 12:35 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> # Thus use exclusions for all those sockets? This would remove all
> # those nasty ignore-errors and No media found in the Report.
> ./dev
> ./tmp
> ./var
> ./media/cdrom
> ./media/floppy
> I assume the last five entries
Hi Paul
I run the comand here is the output.
server:/etc/amanda/DailySet1 # tar -cf - --sparse --one-file-sys --tot
--dir /media . | cat >/dev/null
tar: ./cdrom: Cannot savedir: No medium found
tar: ./floppy: Cannot savedir: No medium found
Total bytes written: 10240 (10kB, 74kB/s)
tar: Error ex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/-- server / lev 0 FAILED [/bin/tar returned 2]
sendbackup: start [greenbottle.smtl.co.uk:/ level 0]
sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar
sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/usr/bin/gzip -dc |/bin/tar -f... -
sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz
sendbackup: info end
? gtar: ./med
Hi,
I upgraded my amanda to 2.4.5 version, and after that sometimes amanda
do backup with lev0 without any tape to holding disk. This broke all my
work order. Before I do full PC dump once a week at Saturday nightly,
incremental PC dump nightly in working days to holding disk. Daily
incremental
Yes, Im sure it's no "error", but i'd like to know why it behaves like that.
Nicklas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul Bijnens
Sent: den 23 juni 2005 12:43
To: Nicklas Bondesson
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Holdingdisk and
Nicklas Bondesson wrote:
Any ideas why I'm getting these messages now after I have changed the
reserve parameter (reserve 10).
planner: Incremental of xxx01:/data01 bumped to level 2.
Note that this message is in the NOTES section, not in the
FAILURE AND STRANGE section. It's just FYI.
Or ar
Hi again
I have briefly read info with the link provide and I had previous
entries in the exclude list as below:
#Exclude a number of files from the backup, this is done using the
following file:
# /usr/local/lib/amanda/exclude.gtar
#The contents of the file will be similar to the following:
core
Any ideas why I'm getting these messages now after I have changed the
reserve parameter (reserve 10).
planner: Incremental of xxx01:/data01 bumped to level 2.
Note: That xxx01.2 file is huge. I noticed that amanda also created a level
1 dump file.
Thanks
Nicklas
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks I am using the link to digest the rest
Cheers
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 12:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, Chuck,
>
> on 23.06.2005, 11:41 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
>
> > I was getting the following this error - server / lev 0 FAILED [dump to
> > tape failed] I assume
Hello, Chuck,
on 23.06.2005, 11:41 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> I was getting the following this error - server / lev 0 FAILED [dump to
> tape failed] I assume tar is not working.
> I am using this version of tar.
> server:/etc/postfix # /bin/tar --version
> tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25
O
Hi again
I was getting the following this error - server / lev 0 FAILED [dump to
tape failed] I assume tar is not working.
I am using this version of tar.
server:/etc/postfix # /bin/tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25
cd /var/lib/amanda/DailySet1
ls -lt > less amdump
(output)
driver: resul
Hello, Nicklas,
on 23.06.2005, 10:13 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> Is there any specific amanda developer list I could report this issue to?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But we already know that, thanks ...
I'll see to get that expression committed.
Best regards,
Stefan G. Weichinger.
mailto:
Is there any specific amanda developer list I could report this issue to?
Thanks
Nicklas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie
Sent: den 17 juni 2005 02:14
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Strange dump details
On Thu, Jun 16
Paul
The -overlooked- hyphen of dd was the culprit.
I now get the desired response from the drive.
Thanks
Gerrit Hommersom
Hommersom, Gerrit (G) wrote:
> For emergency testing I want to read the amanda files with standard
> Unix/Linux tools
>
> W Curtiss preson's book suggests that amanda ta
Hello, khalid,
on 22.06.2005, 17:36 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> I had the same error a few weeks ago. When you do a make, use the bsd
> version. /usr/ccs/bin/make and it should work fine.
Sounds like this should be added to
http://www.amanda.org/docs/systemnotes.html ?
Best regar
44 matches
Mail list logo
