Cameron Beattie wrote:
I am having trouble getting amanda to create index files. I have set
index to yes in the dumptype. I don't believe there is a permissions
problem:
ls -laF /var/lib/amanda/normal/index/hostname
drwxr-sr-x 2 amanda disk 4096 Sep 13 16:56 _/
drwxr-sr-x 4 amanda disk
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing
nothing. It reports one dumper busy with no-bandwidth. What ican my
problem be and what is this no-bandwidth?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# su amanda -c
Hi. There are a couple of parameters on amanda.conf that I can't
figure out exactly their meaning, even after reading the man pages a
thousand times:
- dumpcycle, in days
- runspercycle, in number of amdumps
- tapecycle, in number of tapes
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these
13 16:56 _/
drwxr-sr-x 4 amanda disk 4096 Sep 13 16:47 ./
drwxr-xr-x 4 amanda disk 4096 Sep 13 16:24 ../
I have checked the logfiles and they seem fine:
START driver date 20050913
DISK planner hostname /
START planner date 20050913
WARNING planner tapecycle (3) = runspercycle (10
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
Hi. There are a couple of parameters on amanda.conf that I can't
figure out exactly their meaning, even after reading the man pages a
thousand times:
- dumpcycle, in days
- runspercycle, in number of amdumps
-
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing
nothing. It reports one dumper busy with no-bandwidth. What ican my
problem be and what is this
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 6:01pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing
nothing. It reports one dumper busy with
I've read the amstatus docs and the using amanda chapter. Somehow, I
can't quite figure how to interpret the amstatus output.
This morning I did:
amstatus DailySet1 and got:
--SNIP--
SUMMARY part real estimated
size
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these tapes are rotated,
right?
Not exactly. tapecycle is the minimum number of tapes that will be used
before any single tape can
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:01:37PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing
nothing. It reports one dumper
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:14 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 6:01pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 8:32pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:14 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 6:01pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:53 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:01:37PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue
amstatus I can see that it is still active
2005/9/13, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I read it as don't touch for amanda usage the last 0.5GB. Work only
with what is above that. Of the part amanda can work with, reserve 30%
for degraded mode.
If, at the beginning of the dump, you started with 3GB available space
on the holding
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 8:44pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
I have now cranked up the latter to 3000 kbps, so I'll see tonight how
that behaves.
Why so stingy? I'm assuming you have at least a 100Mbps connection? Why
let amanda use only 3% of that (0.3% if you're using gigabit)?
--
Joshua
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 15:02 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 8:44pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
I have now cranked up the latter to 3000 kbps, so I'll see tonight how
that behaves.
Why so stingy? I'm assuming you have at least a 100Mbps connection? Why
let amanda use
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 10:07pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 15:02 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 8:44pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
I have now cranked up the latter to 3000 kbps, so I'll see tonight how
that behaves.
Why so stingy? I'm assuming
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 16:10 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
We're talking about network bandwidth -- ethernet. And the parameter is
there in case your backup server and/or clients perform other network
intensive functions that you don't want to interfere with. Myself, I
consider backups
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 10:20pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 16:10 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
We're talking about network bandwidth -- ethernet. And the parameter is
there in case your backup server and/or clients perform other network
intensive functions that you
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:41:22PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 at 10:20pm, Erik P. Olsen wrote
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 16:10 -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
We're talking about network bandwidth -- ethernet. And the parameter is
there in case your backup
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:26 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
[snip]
Just a clarification on terminology.
As your dump progresses, dumpers become available, the dumper has to be
assigned to some DLE, i.e. client/disk pair. It is at this point that
amanda will decide to start a new dump or not,
21 matches
Mail list logo
