Hi. I have a couple of questions about amanda's behavior:
The first one is, amadmin CONF tape says, in my case, something like
The next Amanda run should go onto tape ISR005 or a new tape. If I
add a new tape, say label ISR006, I guess it is automatically added to
the amanda tape list, right? My
Hi,
No problem doing amlabel ISR006 right now, amanda will let you do the backup in
ISR005 or ISR006, it is up to you.
I don't know which kind of tape you have, but in scsi tapes you cat do mt -f
/dev/nst0 compression 0 to turn hw comp off.
Cheers,
--
Inaki Sanchez
Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Hi. I restored from amanda before without problems,
even a full server that crashed.
Now I'm trying to restore a directory. When I browse
it from amrecover I see the files that were in the
date I want to restore it. I mark the directory and
I do an lcd, then I start the restoring that requires
4
Francesc Guasch wrote:
Hi. I restored from amanda before without problems,
even a full server that crashed.
Now I'm trying to restore a directory. When I browse
it from amrecover I see the files that were in the
date I want to restore it. I mark the directory and
I do an lcd, then I start the
Francesc Guasch wrote:
En/na Stefan G. Weichinger ha escrit:
Francesc Guasch wrote:
When amanda finishes it has removed most of the files
it restored from the first tape.
Might sound strange, but are you sure that you use the non-rewinding
tape-device when using amrecover?
Hi Stefan, thank
Francesc Guasch wrote:
Hi. I restored from amanda before without problems,
even a full server that crashed.
Now I'm trying to restore a directory. When I browse
it from amrecover I see the files that were in the
date I want to restore it. I mark the directory and
I do an lcd, then I start the
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:16:14PM +0100, Francesc Guasch wrote:
Hi. I restored from amanda before without problems,
even a full server that crashed.
Now I'm trying to restore a directory. When I browse
it from amrecover I see the files that were in the
date I want to restore it. I mark the
En/na Stefan G. Weichinger ha escrit:
Francesc Guasch wrote:
When amanda finishes it has removed most of the files
it restored from the first tape.
Ok ...
You restore into a temporary directory, don't you?
yes
You write, that you see the restored files in amrecover. And you see
them in
Inaki == Inaki Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Inaki No problem doing amlabel ISR006 right now, amanda will let
Inaki you do the backup in ISR005 or ISR006, it is up to you.
But how can I choose which?? Amanda handles the autoloader
automatically, I have no control on what tape goes
En/na Paul Bijnens ha escrit:
Francesc Guasch wrote:
When amanda finishes it has removed most of the files
it restored from the first tape.
In general it is not a suprise that amanda (actually
gnutar or restore!) *removes* files when restoring.
I see
Now, do you imply that you indicated
I don't have any experience with autoloaders, so I can't tell you for sure. If
you backup fits into one tape, put only ISR005 in the autoloader today to
ensure that amanda will use that tape, and tomorrow you can put ISR006.
You can run mt -f /dev/st0 compression 0 at boot time to ensure hw
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:47:31PM +, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Inaki == Inaki Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Inaki No problem doing amlabel ISR006 right now, amanda will let
Inaki you do the backup in ISR005 or ISR006, it is up to you.
But how can I choose which?? Amanda
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:48:14PM +0100, Jehan PROCACCIA enlightened us:
I use amnda to backup several servers, unfortunatly since a few weeks
ago, indexes for amrecover don't work anymore.
I check the faq-o-matic
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/24.html
All,
I have posted a 2.5.0b1 test report on the Amanda forums here:
http://forums.zmanda.com/showthread.php?p=9
Anyone else using 2.5.0 beta, please post your test results, so we can smash
any bugs before the final release.
Cheers,
--Ian
The network admin here would like to start using ACL's on some files
(Centos 4.1 a read hat 4 clone, and Red Hat 4). We use amanda (with
gnutar) I don't think gnu tar supports it (other than by using dump,
which we don't want to do for reliability reasons)
Do you know if ACL support is planned ?
On Friday 25 November 2005 10:47, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
Inaki == Inaki Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Inaki No problem doing amlabel ISR006 right now, amanda will let
Inaki you do the backup in ISR005 or ISR006, it is up to you.
But how can I choose which?? Amanda handles the
I checked, it work perfect.
Leonid
Olivier Nicole wrote:
After upgrade, my system don't send mail to root after each amanda's
command.
My sendmail is work normaly.
What can I do to renew mail from amanda.
What did you upgrade? The operating system? amanda? both?
Try to
I have an amanda user account. I don't know what password the portage
install used for it, so I stomped on it using the passwd command. No
doing an:
su amanda
appears to work (there is no login error), but when I do a whoami, it
reports root, or whatever user I logged in from. Running
Jean-Louis has added his 2.5.0b1 test reports to forums.zmanda.com.
http://forums.zmanda.com/showthread.php?t=8
If you have done testing with 2.5.0b1, please add them to the thread.
Thanks,
Paddy
On 11/23/05, Ian Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have posted a 2.5.0b1 test report on
Hi All,
I also encounter similar problem on RHEL 3 with ia32e and I am also using aic7xxx. I guess it is driver related problem coz I have also tried various kernel version (2.4-21-27 and also 2.4-21-32.0.1) and it did fail randomly and crashed once.
is there any ia32e mailing list ?
Rgds,
20 matches
Mail list logo
