hello,
we are planning to set up a new backup server and want to use amanda to
back up the client.
i did already some testing with amanda and am satisfied so far. one
thing we want for the production
backup is that we want to backup to a disk library inhouse and
additionally put the same
Stefan Herrmann wrote:
hello,
we are planning to set up a new backup server and want to use amanda to
back up the client.
i did already some testing with amanda and am satisfied so far. one
thing we want for the production
backup is that we want to backup to a disk library inhouse and
Hi,
I've just got amanda installed in Debian stable, using the file driver
to a removable USB hard drive.
So with this working I have decided to test a full metal restore; in
case the server needs to be reinstalled at any point from scratch.
So testing the set-up, I do one full backup (in
Hi Again
When tape drive 1 (slot1) fills up I assume without any user
intervention the remainder of the data will backup onto tape drive 2
(slot2) be it external drive (Which I haven't concluded yet looking for
a minimum of 160gb media capacity!)
As version 2.5.0b1 has New tape spanning
Mark Cooke wrote:
I've just got amanda installed in Debian stable, using the file driver
to a removable USB hard drive.
So with this working I have decided to test a full metal restore; in
case the server needs to be reinstalled at any point from scratch.
Good!
So testing the set-up, I
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
When tape drive 1 (slot1) fills up I assume without any user
intervention the remainder of the data will backup onto tape drive 2
(slot2) be it external drive (Which I haven't concluded yet looking for
a minimum of 160gb media capacity!)
Yes indeed.
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:20, Mark Cooke wrote:
Hi,
I've just got amanda installed in Debian stable, using the file driver
to a removable USB hard drive.
So with this working I have decided to test a full metal restore; in
case the server needs to be reinstalled at any point from scratch.
Mark Cooke wrote:
The only thing I'm not sure on is the -f option to amrestore
The man page states:
-f Do a rewind followed by a fsf fileno ... restore an image.
I cannot work out what this represents (I'm sure it's obvious :))
I stabbed at it and just entered 1 and it seems to work ok.
I have a DLE that looks like the following:
server /mnt/image_New_Folder /mnt/image {
include ./New Folder
ghost-image-tar
} -1 local
Actually - I have several DLEs I want to create that have spaces in their
names. When I run an amcheck I get the following
Freels, James D. wrote:
The problem I had started at kernels greater than 2.6.12.x (starting at
2.6.13.0) and was finally cleared at 2.6.15.0.
Interesting ... I am using that module with kernel 2.6.13 and have no
problems. Maybe this related to the old hardware I use, maybe to the
fact that
Its nothing I need immediatly - but it would be really nice to have.
Chris
-- Original Message --
Received: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:12:41 PM MST
From: John Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Freels, James D. wrote:
The problem I had started at kernels greater than 2.6.12.x (starting
at 2.6.13.0) and was finally cleared at 2.6.15.0.
Interesting ... I am using that module with kernel 2.6.13 and have no
problems. Maybe this related to the old hardware
Christopher Davis wrote:
Its nothing I need immediatly - but it would be really nice to have.
I definitely agree on this, all the Samba-server-people will like that
(including me).
Stefan.
the following text was included in the 2.6.15 kernel changelog
The following change was found from the Adaptec developers. Note the
2.6.13+ reference, the word deadlock, and the final sign offs
commit e5508c13ac25b07585229b144a45cf64a990171e
Author: Salyzyn, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat
Gene Heskett wrote:
I can send those scripts offlist if you'd like, but the caveat is that
they aren't pretty, and have a lot of dross still in them from when
they were being fine tuned originally.
Or, I'd sent Stephan W those and he may have cleaned them up, although I
think he just threw
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:08, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
I can send those scripts offlist if you'd like, but the caveat is
that they aren't pretty, and have a lot of dross still in them from
when they were being fine tuned originally.
Or, I'd sent Stephan W those
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:08, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
I can send those scripts offlist if you'd like, but the caveat is
that they aren't pretty, and have a lot of dross still in them from
when they were being
Hi,
Amanda has been working wonderfully for me ever since I started using it
about a year ago. I do have one question though, that plagues me every
time I try to confront it:
I have one directory on one of my boxes that holds files for customers
(each customer gets a subdirectory (the
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 18:20, Cameron Matheson wrote:
Hi,
Amanda has been working wonderfully for me ever since I started using
it about a year ago. I do have one question though, that plagues me
every time I try to confront it:
I have one directory on one of my boxes that holds files
Hi,
I'm planning to use two harddisks with same capacity for my backup
instead of tapes. On my tape-backup I have 14 tapes which I divided
into two groups, group1 and group2, I have a dumpcycle of 7, so every
week I consumes all the 7 tapes for each group. Whe I consumed the
first group
Cameron Matheson wrote:
Hi,
Amanda has been working wonderfully for me ever since I started using it
about a year ago. I do have one question though, that plagues me every
time I try to confront it:
I have one directory on one of my boxes that holds files for customers
(each customer
Hi,
I'm planning to use two harddisks with same capacity for my backup
instead of tapes. On my tape-backup I have 14 tapes which I divided
into two groups, group1 and group2, I have a dumpcycle of 7, so every
week I consumes all the 7 tapes for each group. Whe I consumed the
first group
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:22:41AM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use two harddisks with same capacity for my backup
instead of tapes. On my tape-backup I have 14 tapes which I divided
into two groups, group1 and group2, I have a dumpcycle of 7, so every
week I
23 matches
Mail list logo