Dear all,
I've now installed the newest version of Amanda, and have completed a
full backup to test tape spanning. However, as soon as Amanda ran out
of space on the first tape, it "failed".
The email report contains:
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
server /what/ever lev 0 FAILED "No new tape."
se
This sounds similar to the problem that I was having...it turned out to be an
error in my understanding of the config. Here is the link to the post on the
backupcentral forum:
http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/amanda-20/confusing-problem-with-no-ne
Hi,
Are 14 digit directory names on the holding disk only when using time
stamps or in any case with amanda 2.6.0p1?
I tried using time stamps for awhile and then decided I'd prefer not to
and, as I'm not planning to downgrade or anything, don't expect it to be
a problem.
14 digit directory name
Hi,
My AMANDA 2.6.0p1 installation works--I'm using a Tandberg Magnum 224
LTO3 tape drive.
I can supply the config--is there a way to ensure that runs don't take too long?
Amanda use 14 digits for holding disk directory name since many
releases, it is not related to usetimestamps.
Jean-Louis
Paul Yeatman wrote:
Hi,
Are 14 digit directory names on the holding disk only when using time
stamps or in any case with amanda 2.6.0p1?
I tried using time stamps for awhi
Ah, thanks! That's what coming from 2.4.4p3 will do for ya!
I had a script that used the old directory naming style. I will have
to adapt my script (likely with some effort) unless there is a way to ask
2.6.0 to use the old naming convention, ie. date only.
Paul
->>In response to your message<
FL wrote:
Hi,
My AMANDA 2.6.0p1 installation works--I'm using a Tandberg Magnum 224
LTO3 tape drive.
I can supply the config--is there a way to ensure that runs don't take too long?
That's really a wide open question. You're dealing with the hardware
configuration of your backup server and t
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Paul Yeatman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, thanks! That's what coming from 2.4.4p3 will do for ya!
>
> I had a script that used the old directory naming style. I will have
> to adapt my script (likely with some effort) unless there is a way to ask
> 2.6.0 to us
