Re: amcheckdump (3.1.1) not working

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Sean Walmsley wrote: > It looks to me like: > >  - process 10344 (amcheckdump) creates a pipe >    with file descriptors 8 and 9 at each end. >  - the process forks off a child (10350) >  - the parent closes fd8 >  - the child closes fd9 and eventually dups >    fd8

Re: 3.1.1: Bug in function that reads amandapass

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > When the colums in the file "amandapass" are separated with more than one > space and/or tab, then username/password is not reccognized and the connect > is tried as "guest" (what fails if authentication is required). The function we're usin

Re: No acceptable volumes found

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > I think I am starting to understand but I'm still confused as to why > amdump uses the oldest newly labeled tape but then refuses to use the > second to last newly labelled tape. Also the fact the amreport says > that they should be us

amidxtaped v3.1.1 bug (critical (fatal): Modification of non-creatable array value attempted)

2010-08-06 Thread Luc Lalonde
Hello Folks, I'm moving my stuff to the new version of Amanda (v3.1.1)... from 2.5.2p1. I'm trying testing amrecover-v3.1.1 with a VTAPE configuration and I get this error: ## Fri Aug 6 14:20:18 2010: amidxtaped: pid 16100 ruid 515 euid 5

Re: amvault question suggestions.

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
Robert, how would you feel about testing out the new amvault functionality? If you have a server on which you could install the latest 3.2 snapshot, I'd love to have some feedback. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: amvault question suggestions.

2010-08-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday, August 06, 2010 11:41:32 am McGraw, Robert P did opine: > Using amanda 3.1.1 on Solaris 10 x86 > > I presently run a daily backup every day with > > dumpcycle 7 > runspercycle 0 Side comment Robert, but if you are doing it daily, then runspercycle should also be 7. Your are in effe

Re: Two config variables produce a warning with their default values

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > No. I mean: I haven't this two variables in my config. And if a variable is > not there, then I guess amanda uses it's internal default values for that. > The manpage shows that default values for many options, that are used, when > not confi

Re: amoverview question

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:58 AM, McGraw, Robert P wrote: > Was there a patch for this problem? Thanks to Orion, yes: http://github.com/zmanda/amanda/commit/6ab225a354869f0c85a86e4407dd56193f3872c2 http://github.com/zmanda/amanda/commit/c1fec3ef1b20b0426d7ea702590231740ee4db21 http://github.com/zm

Re: amvault question suggestions.

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:45 AM, McGraw, Robert P wrote: > Instead of running my archive once a month I would like to be able to copy > all the level 0 from one of my daily dumpcycle to my archive tapes. That's the plan! I'm working on better support for 3.2 -- right now it can basically only du

Re: Two config variables produce a warning with their default values

2010-08-06 Thread Marc Muehlfeld
Am 06.08.2010 16:13, schrieb Dustin J. Mitchell: I think you mean "default" as "included in the example config". No. I mean: I haven't this two variables in my config. And if a variable is not there, then I guess amanda uses it's internal default values for that. The manpage shows that defaul

Re: amrecover 3.1.1 failed

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
What's in the amrecover debug log? And what's the fulll amidxtaped log? It looks like your dumps are split into a *lot* of parts - are you using a 10M split size? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: Two config variables produce a warning with their default values

2010-08-06 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > But I haven't configured any of the two variables - so they use their > internal defaults. But the default values seem not to be perfect, when they > produce this warning. I think you mean "default" as "included in the example config". I do

amoverview question

2010-08-06 Thread McGraw, Robert P
Amanda 3.1.1. on Solaris 10 x86 There was recent talk about a problem and possible fix for the amoverview in amanda 3.1.1. Was there a patch for this problem? Robert _ Robert P. McGraw, Jr. Manager, Computer System

amvault question suggestions.

2010-08-06 Thread McGraw, Robert P
Using amanda 3.1.1 on Solaris 10 x86 I presently run a daily backup every day with dumpcycle 7 runspercycle 0 tapecycle 30 tapes Once a month I run an archive in place of a daily backup which we store. This is working ok. Looking through the sbin directory I see the amvault program. Instead

amrecover 3.1.1 failed

2010-08-06 Thread Eko Harianto
Greetings, I'm trying to recover using Amanda-3.1.1 from tapes created by amanda-2.6p2: -- eharia...@bkpsvr:/data$ sudo /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amrecover raw-monthly AMRECOVER Version 3.1.1. Contacting server on bkpsvr ... 220 bkpsvr AMANDA index server (3.1.1) ready. Setting restore date to today

Two config variables produce a warning with their default values

2010-08-06 Thread Marc Muehlfeld
Hello, amcheck (3.1.1) shows the following warning: >WARNING: flush_threshold_dumped (100) must be less than or equal to > flush_threshold_scheduled (0). But I haven't configured any of the two variables - so they use their internal defaults. But the default values seem not to be perfect, when