> On Nov 11, 2019, at 4:24 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Am 11.11.19 um 22:10 schrieb Debra S Baddorf:
>
>> runtimes 3# the max you’ll allow to catch all the level-0 backups
>
> that parameter is not recognized here ;-)
>
> Aside from that: thanks a lot for your feedback,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:34:14PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> At a customer we try to run 2 configs in parallel.
>
> I discussed this setup here in the past, and bring it back up again ;-)
>
> -
>
> We run a daily config with 58 tapes.
> This is run on weekdays 1-4 only.
>
> Until
Am 11.11.19 um 22:10 schrieb Debra S Baddorf:
> runtimes 3# the max you’ll allow to catch all the level-0 backups
that parameter is not recognized here ;-)
Aside from that: thanks a lot for your feedback, Debra
> On Nov 11, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>
> At a customer we try to run 2 configs in parallel.
>
> I discussed this setup here in the past, and bring it back up again ;-)
>
> -
>
> We run a daily config with 58 tapes.
> This is run on weekdays 1-4 only.
>
> Until
At a customer we try to run 2 configs in parallel.
I discussed this setup here in the past, and bring it back up again ;-)
-
We run a daily config with 58 tapes.
This is run on weekdays 1-4 only.
Until now we had:
dumpcycle 2 weeks
runspercycle 8
Would it be better to have
dumpcycle 8
