Amanda Server 2.5.2p1 + ZWC 3.3 + Windows templates = error 278?

2014-01-21 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, I use a Ubuntu server, running Amanda 2.5.2p1 (yes, I know it's *really* old...) to back up a number of Linux machines as well as a Windows 2008R2 server. The latter has ZWC 3.3 installed, which works just nicely. I have two applications with data bases (living on two different

[2.5.2p1] Strange amcheck error if a ZWC client is down (long)

2010-12-17 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, I use amanda 2.5.2p1 on Ubuntu 8.04/64 bit as server, and 2.5.2p1 on several Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, SLES) boxes, plus ZWC on two Windows (2003, XP) machines. The setup works nicely since 2 years for the Linux machines, and since several months for ZWC. We shut down the XP box today,

Re: ZWC crashes

2010-11-23 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 23.11.10 02:26 schrieb(en) Paddy Sreenivasan: Windows client 3.1.3 has not been tested with 2.5.2p1 release. I know... but I use a bunch of production Linux boxes (with Ubuntu 8.04, SuSE and RHEL) and I didn't want to upgrade them all. And even *if* the 2.5.2p1 server sends crap to zwc,

ZWC crashes

2010-11-22 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, I have ZWC-Community-3.1.3-32bit installed on a Win 2003 server. The server is amanda 2.5.2p1 coming with Ubuntu 8.04, re-compiled as to use my own tar wrapper (I need SELinux attributes). Unfortunately, ZWC seems to crash regularly. Symptoms: - on the Ubuntu server, the log says

Re: Not found in archive with Fedora's tar?

2010-09-19 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 16.09.10 19:52 schrieb(en) Dustin J. Mitchell: On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Albrecht Dreß albrecht.dr...@arcor.de wrote: Does anyone know about the reason (and maybe a workaround) for this issue, or is this something for Fedora support?  I don't have a Fedora box, but of course

Not found in archive with Fedora's tar?

2010-09-16 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, sorry for a probably off-topic question, but I hope someone can help me anyway... I use amanda 2.5.2p1 on several Ubuntu 8.04/64 bit boxes. As I use POSIX ACL's and SELinux attributes, which the standard GNU tar coming with Ubuntu doesn't support, I installed the tar variant from

Re: Q: 3.1.2 Windows client with old 2.5.2p1 server?

2010-08-18 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi Dustin! Am 14.08.10 23:34 schrieb(en) Dustin J. Mitchell: I think this will work, but to my knowledge it hasn't been tested, so the best I can say is: try it and find out Thanks a lot - I tried, and it does indeed work fine, using the approach and tweaks (as Ubuntu uses the user 'backup')

Q: 3.1.2 Windows client with old 2.5.2p1 server?

2010-08-13 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, I use Amanda ver. 2.5.2p1 coming with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS to back up three Linux boxes. As the tape drive of my Windows 2003 server died and a quick replacement is not available (as Sony discontinued their AIT drives...), I wonder if it is possible to install the Amanda ver. 3.1.2

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 02.07.10 19:44 schrieb(en) Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net): Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 02.07.10 21:13 schrieb(en) Gene Heskett: Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the existence of the 'List-ID' header. Mailman, iirc, also adds 'X-BeenThere'. Sieve, as an example, is able to deal with them properly

Re: amgtar + acls?

2009-07-04 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 03.07.09 22:39 schrieb(en) Dustin J. Mitchell: Albrecht -- amgtar is now an Amanda application, and its interface is not the same as the tar executable. I see - I forgot to mention that I use amanda 2.5.2p1 on a set of Ubuntu Hardy and RHEL boxes. I re-compiled it myself to get access

Re: amgtar + acls?

2009-07-03 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 03.07.09 17:58 schrieb(en) Alan Hodgson: Does anyone have a working example of using amgtar to backup ACLs and/or selinux attributes? Apparently Fedora comes with a patched tar which supports xattr's, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200925 and

Re: SELinux attrs

2008-07-29 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 28.07.08 20:27 schrieb(en) C. Chan: The GNU tar in RHEL 5 seems to have been patched to allow backing up ACLs and XATTRs. Ah! *That* was a good hint! I'm running Ubuntu, and the gtar coming with it doesn't have support for it. So here's a short compilation of the steps to get Amanda

Re: SELinux attrs

2008-07-28 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 28.07.08 15:08 schrieb(en) Nickolas Gray: New to list, looking for a good solution to backing up SELinux systems with MLS policues The reference in the Amanda documentation regarding SELinux xattrs is a rather cryptic one-liner The problem is that amanda relies upon GNU tar which is

Re: Release of Amanda-6.2

2008-04-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 01.04.08 22:35 schrieb(en) Jean-Francois Malouin: dpkg reports 2.12.4 installed: ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2 The GLib library of C routines Doesn't Debian/Ubuntu have the devel libs and headers in the libglib2.0-dev package? Cheers, Albrecht. pgpOfUzZQAsk2.pgp Description: PGP

Re: amtapetype_problem

2008-03-13 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 13.03.08 16:32 schrieb(en) Paul Bijnens: But I think the problem is deeper: if it is indeed that on this machine rewind flags success too early, or that subsequent requests do not block until the rewind is completely finished, then I believe amlabel will have the same problem: it writes

gtar errors

2008-03-01 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi, on an Ubuntu 7.10 box running amanda 2.5.1p3, I see the following messages in the report: ? gtar: .: Warning: Cannot stat: Cannot allocate memory ? gtar: .: Warning: Cannot stat: Cannot allocate memory Does this mean that the backup failed? Any idea where they come from, and how to

Re: gtar errors

2008-03-01 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 01.03.08 16:30 schrieb(en) Dustin J. Mitchell: The slightly less obvious answer may be that something funny happened with the filesystem -- perhaps the directory gtar was working in was deleted? Was NFS involved? ENOMEM tends to be used for reasons other than its literal meaning. Not

Amanda tar on cygwin: Cannot stat

2007-10-24 Thread Albrecht Dreß
the issue? Shortening the file names is *not* a solution, as I probably cannot explain to the Win users why the system accepts their file names, but the backup application doesn't... Any help is really welcome! Cheers, Albrecht. -- Albrecht Dreß - Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13 - D-53123 Bonn

Re: Fibre Channel und SAN support

2007-10-16 Thread Albrecht Dreß
more explanations] -- Albrecht Dreß - Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13 - D-53123 Bonn (Germany) Phone (+49) 228 6199571 - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG public key: http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-dreszal/pubkey.asc pgp1NgV3kFWxw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Fibre Channel und SAN support

2007-10-15 Thread Albrecht Dreß
, some kind of direct (via the Fibre Channel) access would probably be faster. Thanks in advance for any insight, Cheers, Albrecht. -- Albrecht Dreß - Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13 - D-53123 Bonn (Germany) Phone (+49) 228 6199571 - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG public key: http