I'm in the process of upgrading from 2.5.0p2 to 2.6.1p2 and from an SAIT
drive to an LTO-4 drive on the backup server (CentOS 5.4, 64-bit). This
is the second time I've seen amcheck knock my tape drive offline.
Here's the scenario that led to the problem:
I successfully ran an amdump overn
hanks for the suggestion which
ultimately led me to discover this. :-)
-Fran
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
This isn't strictly related to Amanda but this list has been an
excellent resource for tape drive configuration in the past, so I am
hoping someone here can help.
I've recently obtained a
re out of the drive.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio, Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/ | 205.934.0653
his is a known bug which an upgrade would resolve.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
acking going on,
it would probably reject a reply packet after 800+ seconds.
If that doesn't prove to be the case, take a look at a tcpdump of the
connection, to see whether the REP packet or its ACK is actually being
lost.
Dustin
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Com
uld appear from that statement that the problems I am seeing are
not basic incompatibilities, and my question becomes more about what is
causing these "stranded on waitq" messages from 2.4.4pX clients with the
2.5.0p2 server that were working on with the 2.4.5p1 server.
--
Fran Fab
er 2.5.0p2
clients all worked.
I'm just curious if these are known incompatibilities or something
specific to my setup I need to look into further.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at
lad it's resolved, anyway.
-Fran
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
I have been running tests all afternoon to try to pinpoint the
problem. First issue I am having is with the amcheck timing out.
I have ctimeout set to 150, but amcheck appears to be ignoring that...
-bash-3.1$ /usr/sbin/amcheck -c
: time 59.987: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 59.987: waiting for ack: timeout, giving up!
amandad: time 59.987: pid 31419 finish time Wed Apr 19 16:54:30 2006
So that's the first problem. Any thoughts on this one?
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Com
selinux turned on in FC5? probably not in rh9.
I have it disabled on the FC5 box. I also imagine that if this were the
case, all clients would fail or none. But good idea.
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at
have minimal disruption to
the normal backup cycle. Probably best, and not that hard to set up.
I'll give that a shot.
Ram "TK" Krishnamurthy wrote:
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
I recently upgraded the server side to 2.4.5 and a subset of my hosts
are consistently timing out on
config where
the only change is a server upgrade from 2.4.4 to 2.4.5 which
corresponded with a move from redhat 9 to fedora core 5 for the server?
Thoughts about the best way to debug?
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
.
So, I think we can close this thread out as far as Amanda is concerned. :-)
Thanks,
Fran
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
I think that if you google on 'NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND' you
will find that it is a samba problem, not an amanda one. I used to
get lines similar in reports unre
I think that if you google on 'NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND' you will find
that it is a samba problem, not an amanda one. I used to get lines similar
in reports unrelated to amanda, but unfortunately I can't remember the cure.
I do agree, but it appears to be with the specific manner in w
I just had to move to a new install of Amanda due to a crash of my
backup server. The new server is using the Amanda 2.4.5p1 packages
under Fedora Core 5, the old server was redhat 9 and Amanda 2.4.4p2. I
copied the config from the old server to the new exact, and all worked
fine (minus the
Holliden. :-)
So while the problem with chg-scsi is not resolved, my dependence on
that issue is. :-)
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
I am migrating my Amanda server from RH9 to Fedora Core 5. Using the
Amanda 2.4.5p1 RPMs available from the FC5 repository. Only thing I
cannot get working under FC5 is
conf. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
number_configs 1
eject 1 # Tapedrives need an eject command
sleep 5 #
S-025, Barcode -> A025,
Loadcount 88
Slot -> 0, from -> 0, valid -> 1, Tag -> CIS-026, Barcode -> A026,
Loadcount 92
Slot -> 19, from -> 0, valid -> 1, Tag -> CIS-027, Barcode -> A027,
Loadcount 89
Slot -> 20, from -> 0, valid ->
cal
device which is the partition that holds the backup target. Everything
seems in order there. What else could be causing the permission
problem? Wondering if this might be related to LVM.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Scie
ow for the future!
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
Murphy's law - as soon as I post, I find the thread. The key was
searching on 'replacing', not 'removing', 'deleting' or 'adding'. :-)
The thread I found was from Feb 04 and recommended:
amrmtape $CONFIG $LABEL
amlabel $CONFIG $LABEL
amflush $CONFI
but is there a different procedure for when you just want to
retire a tape? Something like:
# amadmin CIS no-reuse CIS-008
(Will Amanda then prompt for a new tape to get back to desired number of
tapes? Or do I just load a fresh tape and...)
# amlabel CIS CIS-XXX
Thanks, and sorry again fo
f tapes (such as for long-term archiving). But right now, mostly
concerned about replacing the bad tape with a fresh one. :-)
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
es available.
Related to this would be docs for adding and removing tapes from a
set. Also useful might be some documentation on managing a separate
set of tapes (such as for long-term archiving). But right now, mostly
concerned about replacing the bad tape with a fresh one. :-)
Thanks
be simple isn't looked at that way - because the next guy
is going to search the archives with that message string and solve his
problem. :-) I find that to be even more natural than a FAQ.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
U
it up this way,
but apparently on that other server, I set the amanda group to disk.
Changing it to amanda did the trick. I had forgotten that you set the
group in the xinetd entry.
Thanks!!
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University
wo amanda users or two amanda
groups colliding somehow
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
Is the amanda user's primary group amanda? If you are using xinetd, you
might have to set "groups = yes" to make sure secondary groups are used.
Matt
Yep, user 'amanda' has a primary (and only) group of 'amanda'. I did
both the build and install as root - another user suggested that might
be
I'm having an odd problem with runtar on one of my linux clients. Here
is the ls -l entry for it. I'm -positive- that the 'amanda' user is in
the 'amanda' group.
-rwsr-x---1 root amanda 13035 Nov 28 08:14 runtar
When I run amcheck, I get
[can not execute /usr/local/libexec/runtar:
even if I can't work
your idea into the presentation I can try to clarify it in the
supporting docs.
It might be best to take the responses off-list. :-) Thanks!
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
. So if you would
like to provide input, I'd certainly appreciate it. Hope to see some of
you in Portland!
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
http://www.cis.uab.edu/
205.934.0653
r problem, but my amanda.conf's tapedev looks
like this:
tapedev "0" # the says to look at chg-scsi.conf config 0
Your setting above might be causing amanda to not look in chg-scsi for
settings. Just a quick guess.
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Departm
da to not look in chg-scsi for
settings. Just a quick guess.
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.cis.uab.edu
205.934.0653
tar that Amanda was configured with. I suspect that you may have
two different versions of tar on the box and Amanda is using a
broken one.
Bingo - you and Jon L. both pinned this one down. Knowing there were
multiple versions of tar on this machine I tried to be smart by specifying
the --with
.4.4p2, if that's a
helpful clue. Color me baffled.
-Fran
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 16:13:10 -0600 Fran Fabrizio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to restore a file from my web document root. This is an
area that's been very static (except for t
olor me baffled.
-Fran
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 16:13:10 -0600 Fran Fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to restore a file from my web document root. This is an area that's been
very static (except for today when I blew on top of something I shouldn&
recover works? Shouldn't I be seeing all
the files in that area? I want to restore
/www/htdocs/staticarea/news/page.html, how do I go about this?
Am I having a stupid Friday afternoon moment, or is this messed up? Did
my index get hosed or something?
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Sys
t I be seeing all
the files in that area? I want to restore
/www/htdocs/staticarea/news/page.html, how do I go about this?
Am I having a stupid Friday afternoon moment, or is this messed up? Did
my index get hosed or something?
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Com
ectories listed
below:
? /tmp/
? /var/tmp/
? /
? Please correct this problem and rerun the program.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
Programs that do backups output many messages. Lots are "normal".
Amanda tries to keep a catalog of those that should be considered "normal".
If a version of the backup program adds new "normal" messages, or you hit
one that is not cataloged, or changes existing ones (sometimes even an
extra spac
On all of my Samba-based backups, I am getting STRANGE reports like this:
/-- keep.cis.u //snapper/dfs/home/faculty lev 0 STRANGE
sendbackup: start [keep.cis.uab.edu://snapper/dfs/home/faculty level 0]
sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/bin/smbclient
sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/gzip -dc |/usr/bin/
Samba 3.0.1.
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 15:51, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2004 13:53, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
> >Just to provide some closure, I sent the relevant details about this
> > bug to samba-technical list, and it turned out to indeed be a Samba
> > bug.
Just to provide some closure, I sent the relevant details about this bug
to samba-technical list, and it turned out to indeed be a Samba bug. A
developer sent me a patch last night that seems to have solved the
problem. Thanks for everyone's help here!
-Fran
?) Can I alter the gnutar-lists on the target or do I
have to do something on the server?
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
s to Samba lists on this issue
over the past three days will trigger someone's memory.
Thanks for your help,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
ectory call "stuff", is there a way to specify that I only want
> Amanda to backup that directory instead of all of the c$?
>
> Thank you!!
> Bryan Walton
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
ommunicating with a Windows 2003 server."
>
> Yeah, but the chapter is called "I CanÂt Join a Windows 2003 PDC".
> You didnÅt answer my question for the possibility to use a stand-alone
> Samba.
>
> > However, it doesn't matter if it's set to yes or no, i
g with Windows 2003 domain
> controllers in particular.
>
> Default: client use spnego = yes
>
> ##
>
> Ok? Give it a try ...
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
Another fast-google:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2003-October/032249.html
I know that signing is working between the server and client at least
initially, since I can successfully retrieve 750MB or so of data, and on
shares that are smaller than that, I can get the entire sha
Do you get any error messages? What does AMANDA tell you?
What´s in the logfiles for AMANDA and/or Samba?
Amanda reports STRANGE, and the logs show SMB signing errors (which I've
googled extensively for with no luck, and posted to the Samba list but no
luck there either). The process will be ch
da settings, perhaps if I
make mine match yours, I can solve this problem from that angle instead.
Thank you,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
22Server+packet+had+invalid+SMB+signature%21%22&btnG=Google+Search
>
> This didn't seem to return many results for me. You may want to do
> some further digging in Samba mailing list archives, post to Samba
> lists, etc.
>
> Fran Fabrizio said:
> >
> > I'm
434)
| Total bytes written: 763533824
sendbackup: size 745639
sendbackup: end
\
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
newer ones exist on a
regular basis, but I would like to know the boundaries for when we do
need to do this.
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
e cause could be and a possible fix? Is there a
way to specify the flags that should be passed to smbclient?
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
24.241: done with amname '/export/home', dirname
'/export/home', spindle -1
sendsize[13149]: time 7024.247: child 13151 terminated normally
sendsize: time 7024.247: pid 13149 finish time Tue Jan 6 03:52:56 2004
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
rs in disklist
- re-run amdump
- restore disklist to former state
Any fallout from following that procedure?
Thanks,
Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior Systems Analyst
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
University of Alabama - Birmingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(205) 934-0653
foo now" and misinterpret it as a status update
as opposed to it telling you to go do something. :-) Maybe it's just
me, but "You should rewind and load tape foo now and then hit Y to
continue" would be a bit more wordy, but much clearer.
-Fran
--
Fran Fabrizio
Senior
> Extracting files using tape drive file:/backup/t2 on host hccweb.
> Load tape DailySet100 now
> Continue [?/Y/n/t]? y
> EOF, check amidxtaped.debug file on hccweb.
> amrecover: short block 0 bytes
> UNKNOWN file
> amrecover: Can't read file header
> extract_list - child returned non-zero status:
This might save someone 10 hours or so...it was produced on a Sony SDZ-100 SAIT drive
inside of a Qualstar
TLS-5433 changer.
define tapetype SONY-SAIT {
comment "Sony SAIT (hardware compression off)"
length 487680 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 29186 kps
}
--
Fra
I'm guessing that was mentioned somewhere because it sounds vaguely
familiar, I just can't place it. I just read the seciton on 'dump' in Unix
Backup and Recovery and they didn't seem to mention that, but the error
message and your comments had me leaning that way and the manpage removed
all d
Ok I think I solved my mysterytime to go do some reading (I forgot
to look at the logs over in /tmp/amanda/)...
sendsize[10129]: time 1.057: getting size via dump for /usr/local level 1
sendsize[10129]: time 1.058: calculating for device '/usr/local' with ''
sendsize[10129]: time 1.058: r
Here is my amdump log for the last runsee note in there where I think
it's failing
# more amdump.1
amdump: start at Mon Dec 22 18:06:54 CST 2003
amdump: datestamp 20031222
planner: pid 9956 executable /usr/local/libexec/planner version 2.4.4p1
planner: build: VERSION="Amanda-2.4.4p1"
plan
UMMARY:
> DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
> HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
> -- -----
> keep.cis.uab /usr/local 1 FAILED
2.17rel/loaderinfo -f /dev/sg1
> > cannot open SCSI device '/dev/sg1' - Permission denied
>
> Are you sure you are a member of group `disk'? `id' at the shell prompt
> gives you that info, as does `groups'. If you aren't, have you logged
> in anew
'
Revision: '221a'
etc...
So even though 'amanda' is a member of the 'disk' group, the device has
'disk' as it's group, and the device has permissions 660, 'amanda' can't
access the device unless I make it world-read/writabl
I am attempting to configure Amanda to run on our Qualstar SAIT changer,
and I have a few questions...
1. lt-amtapetype. I couldn't find any tapetype info for SAIT tapes in the
config file, mailing list archives or via googling so I resorted to running
the amtapetype script. I turned off hard
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 10:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How many tapes do you manage? If the number is under 50 to 100 (depending
Right now, it's not likely to exceed 20-25. It's a system we hope to
"grow into". :-)
> But, if you do the sensible thing, sending some subset of your tapes offsite
I'm newly entering the area of large-scale backup operations, and I have
an option to add a barcode reader to our tape library system that we
will be ordering (Qualstar TLS-5433 SAIT). I'm wondering how important
it is to have a barcode reader on the tape library? The way I
understand it (shaky,
Our group is thinking of purchasing a Qualstar
TLS-5433 SAIT library. From the
documentation I’ve read, Amanda supports some, but not all, changers/robots. Will this be a supported model?
Also, the following excerpt from the Amanda chapter of the Unix
Backup And Recovery book has me a
70 matches
Mail list logo