Quoting "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, Andreas,
>
> on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 09:29 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> AS> Well, now I have created a user named amanda which has default group
> membership
> AS> disk and is also a member of users. Then I recompiled with user=am
Quoting "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, Andreas,
>
> on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 09:29 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> AS> Well, now I have created a user named amanda which has default group
> membership
> AS> disk and is also a member of users. Then I recompiled with user=am
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:07:39PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> Anyway here's the diff from 2.6.5-rc1 to 2.6.5-rc2:
I am not a kernel hacker and I have not checked the source. But judging from
the diff there is one thing that look strange to me:
Old code assigned exp_amanda_info->offset befo
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 at 21:07 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> It appears that a change occured in ip_conntrack_amanda.c between
AS> 2.6.5-rc1 and rc2 (this change isn't mentioned in the Changelog or I am
AS> unable to find it). I don't know what I was
Hi, Andreas,
on Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 at 21:07 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> It appears that a change occured in ip_conntrack_amanda.c between
AS> 2.6.5-rc1 and rc2 (this change isn't mentioned in the Changelog or I am
AS> unable to find it). I don't know what I was thinking when I went from
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 at 08:09 you wrote to amanda-users:
A diff against my current .config shows that this seems to be a pretty
fat kernel, many many things compiled into it statically ...
I am no kernel-hacker but I know that having ONE of all those
I've experienced similar problems backing up a Windows 2000 client
(with the Cygwin Amanda client) from a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 AS
(Itanium) box. The errors only happen when the Windows box is on the
far side of a Fedora Core 2 bridge/gateway. When the Windows box is
directly attached to t
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 at 08:09 you wrote to amanda-users:
A diff against my current .config shows that this seems to be a pretty
fat kernel, many many things compiled into it statically ...
I am no kernel-hacker but I know that having ONE of all those
Hi, Andreas,
on Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 at 08:09 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> A diff against my current .config shows that this seems to be a pretty
>> fat kernel, many many things compiled into it statically ...
>>
>> I am no kernel-hacker but I know that having ONE of all those options
>> wro
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 21:56 you wrote to amanda-users:
Where could that one reside? A faulty network-module? Remember that
these things work fine here with each 2.6 ..
AS> I'm almost sure it's some kind of kernel bug. That's why I have bothered
AS>
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Very very strange...
Do you have netcat installed?
What is the output of this command on 2.6.6rc2?
nc -v -v -s 127.0.0.1 -p 1234 127.0.0.1 1234
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/amanda$ nc -v -v -s 127.0.0.1 -p 1234 127.0.0.1 1234
localhost [127.0.0.1] 1234 (?) open
/Andreas
Very very strange...
Do you have netcat installed?
What is the output of this command on 2.6.6rc2?
nc -v -v -s 127.0.0.1 -p 1234 127.0.0.1 1234
--
Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUMFax +32 16 397.512
http://w
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 21:56 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> Where could that one reside? A faulty network-module? Remember that
>> these things work fine here with each 2.6 ..
AS> I'm almost sure it's some kind of kernel bug. That's why I have bothered
AS> to narrow down on wi
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Just for fun: if you disable the indexing, then the backup will run
fine, I believe. ("index no" in dumptype).
Well, no it doesn't work that way either.
/Andreas
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 16:49 you wrote to amanda-users:
PB> And amanda cleans up the other two connections.
PB> Amanda tries again with another set of ports a few times
PB> but always trying to connect to 65535 for the index.
PB> Then she gives up comple
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 16:49 you wrote to amanda-users:
PB> And amanda cleans up the other two connections.
PB> Amanda tries again with another set of ports a few times
PB> but always trying to connect to 65535 for the index.
PB> Then she gives up completely.
I also noticed the
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
It seems ethereal store only the first few bytes of each packet.
There is probably an option to set that size; similar to "tcpdump -s
1500".
That means I don't have the full info, but I believe I've seen enough!
Following up on myself.
I've digged into the
Paul Bijnens wrote:
It seems ethereal store only the first few bytes of each packet.
There is probably an option to set that size; similar to "tcpdump -s 1500".
That means I don't have the full info, but I believe I've seen enough!
Following up on myself.
I've digged into the amanda source, and not
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
I have now made a dump on the traffic passing through lo during the amdump. I
have also recompiled amanda with these two settings (as another friendly person
suggested): --with-tcpportrange=5,50040 --with-udpportrange=890,899
The dump is available at ftp://zappa.cx/pub/
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 13:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> I have now made a dump on the traffic passing through lo during the amdump.
AS> I
AS> have also recompiled amanda with these two settings (as another friendly person
AS> suggested): --with-tcpportrange=5,50040 --w
Quoting Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
>
> > Also what do you recommend as parameters to tcpdump, it's all running on
> the
> > same host does that mean I can sniff on "lo"?
>
> This works for me on Linux 2.4.22:
>
>sudo tcpdump -i lo -w trace.lo
I have now ma
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
Also what do you recommend as parameters to tcpdump, it's all running on the
same host does that mean I can sniff on "lo"?
This works for me on Linux 2.4.22:
sudo tcpdump -i lo -w trace.lo
--
Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511
Technolo
Quoting Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
>
> > All went well and the backup finished successful. Then I switched to my
> > identically compiled 2.6.6-rc2 kernel and it fails with the same error as
> earlier:
> > These dumps were to tape dflt10.
> > The next tape Amanda
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 09:29 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> Well, now I have created a user named amanda which has default group membership
AS> disk and is also a member of users. Then I recompiled with user=amanda,
AS> group=disk and installed.
AS> I had som trouble to get i
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
All went well and the backup finished successful. Then I switched to my
identically compiled 2.6.6-rc2 kernel and it fails with the same error as earlier:
These dumps were to tape dflt10.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: dflt11.
The next new tape already labelled is:
Quoting Andreas Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Eric Siegerman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> >
> >> --with-user=root \
> >> --with-group=root
> >
> >
> > A stab in the dark here: these settings seem a bit suspicious.
> > Normal
On Monday 14 June 2004 15:41, Eric Siegerman wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
>> --with-user=root \
>> --with-group=root
>
>A stab in the dark here: these settings seem a bit suspicious.
>Normally one doesn't run Amanda as root; it's able
Eric Siegerman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
--with-user=root \
--with-group=root
A stab in the dark here: these settings seem a bit suspicious.
Normally one doesn't run Amanda as root; it's able to get root
privilege when it needs it (t
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> --with-user=root \
> --with-group=root
A stab in the dark here: these settings seem a bit suspicious.
Normally one doesn't run Amanda as root; it's able to get root
privilege when it needs it (that's what the l
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
I'm sending this now to the amanda-users list, I originally sent it to
the linux-kernel ml but the only person who have answered my mail is
Gene Heskett which also recommended me to try here.
I'm using amanda-2.4.4p2 but I have also tried 2.4.5b1-2004
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Sonntag, 13. Juni 2004 at 15:04 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> I have trouble upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6, I have narrowed
AS> it down by trying the different rc releases. Between 2.6.6-rc1 and
AS> 2.6.6-rc2 something happens that make my amanda backups
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
I'm sending this now to the amanda-users list, I originally sent it to
the linux-kernel ml but the only person who have answered my mail is
Gene Heskett which also recommended me to try here.
I'm using amanda-2.4.4p2 but I have also tried 2.4.5b1-20040510 with the
same
Hi, Andreas,
on Sonntag, 13. Juni 2004 at 15:04 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> I have trouble upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6, I have narrowed
AS> it down by trying the different rc releases. Between 2.6.6-rc1 and
AS> 2.6.6-rc2 something happens that make my amanda backups fail
AS> with the error [
I'm sending this now to the amanda-users list, I originally sent it to the linux-kernel ml but the only person who have answered my
mail is Gene Heskett which also recommended me to try here.
I'm using amanda-2.4.4p2 but I have also tried 2.4.5b1-20040510 with the same results.
I have trouble upg
34 matches
Mail list logo
