Toomas,
Amanda 3.3.6 will have a new ambsdtar application that use the bsd tar
program to back up with ACLs.
Jean-Louis
On 03/17/2014 05:19 PM, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
This first FreeBSD 10 server is also my first encounter with
filesystem ACLs. As thousands of Amanda users before me, I
Hello!
This first FreeBSD 10 server is also my first encounter with
filesystem ACLs. As thousands of Amanda users before me, I discovered
that GNU tar doesn't back up ACLs and star is often recommended as an
alternative which does. Only thing is, the star port doesn't want to
Am 03.07.09 22:39 schrieb(en) Dustin J. Mitchell:
Albrecht -- amgtar is now an Amanda application, and its interface is
not the same as the tar executable.
I see - I forgot to mention that I use amanda 2.5.2p1 on a set of
Ubuntu Hardy and RHEL boxes. I re-compiled it myself to get access to
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
> My /usr/local/sbin/amgtar is simply a shell script wrapping the Fedora tar
> as to include the extended attributes:
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
> /opt/bin/setar --xattrs "$@"
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Albrecht.
Albrecht -- amgtar is now an Amanda applica
On Friday 03 July 2009, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
> Am 03.07.09 17:58 schrieb(en) Alan Hodgson:
> > Does anyone have a working example of using amgtar to backup ACLs
> > and/or selinux attributes?
>
> Apparently Fedora comes with a patched tar which supports xattr's, see
>
Am 03.07.09 17:58 schrieb(en) Alan Hodgson:
Does anyone have a working example of using amgtar to backup ACLs
and/or selinux attributes?
Apparently Fedora comes with a patched tar which supports xattr's, see
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200925> a
Does anyone have a working example of using amgtar to backup ACLs and/or
selinux attributes?
It seems that any of the --acls, --selinux or --xattrs flags are actually
incompatible with the --listed-incremental flag to GNU tar? I hacked
the --xattrs option into amgtar but I can't seem to g
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:57, David Leangen wrote:
>Thanks again for all your help. Comments inline.
>
>> Well, I guess I'm convinced to try out tar
>
>Setting up tar was a snap, and there were no errors!
>
>One more perhaps silly question, but just something I'd like to
> verify...
>
>I assume
Thanks again for all your help. Comments inline.
Well, I guess I'm convinced to try out tar
Setting up tar was a snap, and there were no errors!
One more perhaps silly question, but just something I'd like to verify...
I assume that the tar program is run on the client machine, so that
mea
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:30:05AM +0900, David Leangen wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I'm convinced to try out tar, but not to play the devil's
> advocate, I'm just curious...
>
> >I don't (didn't) use tar at Purdue, in general, because it
> > changes the access time on the files it backs up. That'
Well, I guess I'm convinced to try out tar, but not to play the devil's
advocate, I'm just curious...
I don't (didn't) use tar at Purdue, in general, because it
> changes the access time on the files it backs up. That's a
> very bad thing.
Why is this such a bad thing? If we suppose that (
>The actual reasons why one might prefer tar to dump are that tar is
>cross-platform ...
>... and tar allows you to make backups of arbitrary (sub-)directory
>trees instead of entire filesystems.
In addition to that, the reason tar is **strongly** pushed on Linux is
that dump works with the raw
Gene Heskett wrote:
Well, tar is file based, and its recovery can be to an already
occupied directory. Dump does the disk structure (AIUI) so that the
recovered stuff goes back to the same place on the disk (if I've got
it right that is, corrections welcome)
Files from backups made with dump
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 02:48, David Leangen wrote:
[...]
>Why would tar be better than dump? It seems to me, based on what my
>understanding of the two are, that dump is more appropriate. That's not
>the case?
>
Well, tar is file based, and its recovery can be to an already
occupied directo
partition, would this cause a problem?
Start with man pages setfacl and getfacl (I think those are the
names in FC3).
Yes, you're right. Ok, so ACL is just the name for file and directory
permissions... no big deal at all.
Appears your release does not do ACLs, but if you upgrade your
rippled.
> > Wonderful folks, those vendors.
>
>From the home page of the dump/restore development group:
An experimental patch for dump-0.4b39 can be downloaded here
which adds EA/ACL (Extended Attributes/Access Control Lists)
support in both dump and restore. This patch
Thank you for all the replies! Comments inline...
> >sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : normal(|) DUMP+ ACLs in inode #xxx wont't be
> >dumped sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : index tee cannot write [Broken pipe]
> Offhand, it sounds like a permissions problem but what do I know?
&
>I am getting something like the following in my logs, and somehow it
>doesn't seem right...
>
>sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : normal(|) DUMP+ ACLs in inode #xxx wont't be
>dumped
First, please realize that it's your dump program reporting this,
not Amanda. Amand
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:21:46PM +0900, David Leangen wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I am getting something like the following in my logs, and somehow it
> doesn't seem right...
>
> sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : normal(|) DUMP+ ACLs in inode #xxx wont't be
> dumped
&
On Monday 26 September 2005 05:21, David Leangen wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I am getting something like the following in my logs, and somehow it
>doesn't seem right...
>
>sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : normal(|) DUMP+ ACLs in inode #xxx wont't be
>dumped
>sendbackup : tim
Hello!
I am getting something like the following in my logs, and somehow it
doesn't seem right...
sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : normal(|) DUMP+ ACLs in inode #xxx wont't be
dumped
sendbackup : time xxx.xxx : index tee cannot write [Broken pipe]
Any ideas what all this about?
Thanks!
Dave
* Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040730 11:20]:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 at 10:50am, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
>
> > I find myself forced to use ACLs for a finer-grained permissions setup
> > of a few filesystems (Irix CXFS) and I wonder if any of you had done
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 at 10:50am, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
> I find myself forced to use ACLs for a finer-grained permissions setup
> of a few filesystems (Irix CXFS) and I wonder if any of you had done a
> similar thing. The irix tar claims to have the capability of backing
> u
Hello,
I find myself forced to use ACLs for a finer-grained permissions setup
of a few filesystems (Irix CXFS) and I wonder if any of you had done a
similar thing. The irix tar claims to have the capability of backing
up ACLs but I can't use it because of other problems with this
version.
Amanda", but I wasn't sure about his requirement #5 (below) pertaining
> > to Solaris ACLs. Will Amanda actually do what he wants?
> >
...
>
>
>
> The man page doesn't mention ACL's, but I suspect it will
That was supposed to say "ufsdump man pag
Talking of snapshots, FreeBSD 5.x can do this too with the -L flag to dump.
Can someone remind me of how to generate a specific backup type (in
amanda.conf) that passes the -L flag to dump on the remote system.
Ta
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 8
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:35:49PM -0600, Frank Smith wrote:
> Someone on the sage-members list is looking for free backup software
> that met his listed requirements, and I was about to reply with
> "Amanda", but I wasn't sure about his requirement #5 (below) pertaining
Someone on the sage-members list is looking for free backup software
that met his listed requirements, and I was about to reply with
"Amanda", but I wasn't sure about his requirement #5 (below) pertaining
to Solaris ACLs. Will Amanda actually do what he wants?
Thanks,
Frank
>
You wrote:
>tar won't get ACLs. An FS specific dump program probably will.
>> If i must use star instead of tar, where i must configure this?
>> (which entry in which file?)
>I don't know if star is drop-in replaceable for tar. ISTR that it only
>does one leve
On Thu April 3 2003 10:02, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:32PM +0200, Dalton Hubert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are thinking about using ACLs (extended attributes and access
>> control lists) on our file server, of which we make a full
>> backup by u
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:32PM +0200, Dalton Hubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are thinking about using ACLs (extended attributes and access control
> lists) on our file server, of which we make a full backup by using Amanda
> every night.
>
> So my question concerning the ba
Amanda manages backups using whatever native tool it's configured to use.
You don't state what platform you're using I can't speculate as to an
ACL-aware tool for it.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 at 1:15pm, Dalton Hubert wrote
> we are thinking about using ACLs (extended attributes and access control lists)
> on our file server, of which we make a full backup by using Amanda every night.
>
> So my question concerning the backup is:
> Can Amanda a
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 13:15, Dalton Hubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are thinking about using ACLs (extended attributes and access control lists)
> on our file server, of which we make a full backup by using Amanda every night.
>
> So my question concerning the backup is:
> C
Hi,
we are thinking about using ACLs (extended attributes and access control lists)
on our file server, of which we make a full backup by using Amanda every night.
So my question concerning the backup is:
Can Amanda also backup ACLs?
Do i have to change something in my configuration?
I have
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:30:14AM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth said:
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Adam Smith wrote:
>
> > On FreeBSD 5.0 with UFS2 + ACLs, what is my best method for backing up my
> > ACLs along with my files?
> >
> > I am only experimenting with Aman
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Adam Smith wrote:
> On FreeBSD 5.0 with UFS2 + ACLs, what is my best method for backing up my
> ACLs along with my files?
>
> I am only experimenting with Amanda at this point, but it seems to use the
> native tar utility, however tar does not support the bac
Check your acl package to see if it supports recursive fetch/restore. If
it does, just before dump time, do a recursive getfacl , redirected to a
file. After a tar restore, you can use your listed acls file to restore
the acls.
I currently don't use this method ( on RH7.3) , but I
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 at 10:25am, Adam Smith wrote
> On FreeBSD 5.0 with UFS2 + ACLs, what is my best method for backing up my
> ACLs along with my files?
>
> I am only experimenting with Amanda at this point, but it seems to use the
> native tar utility, however tar does not supp
On FreeBSD 5.0 with UFS2 + ACLs, what is my best method for backing up my
ACLs along with my files?
I am only experimenting with Amanda at this point, but it seems to use the
native tar utility, however tar does not support the backing up of ACLs.
Can anyone show me what I need to do?
Regards
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:53:54 +0200
Guillaume Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to save Windows (NTFS) files, but it seems that Amanda doesn't
> keep the ACLs. Does someone know if there is a mean to do that, or is it
> definitly not possible?
>
>
Hi,
I have to save Windows (NTFS) files, but it seems that Amanda doesn't
keep the ACLs. Does someone know if there is a mean to do that, or is it
definitly not possible?
thanks
Guillaume
42 matches
Mail list logo
