On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> I still don't understand why the separate level 0 dumps where smaller
> than the single level 0 by some 200gig though... Does my regular
> expression exclude recursively or something ?
I wonder if this has something to do with the case-insensi
I will be out of office From 7/1 through 7/8. In my absense, please
contact Seth Rothenberg(ext.6091) or Rimma Maro(ext.6228).
On 07/03/2009 05:49 PM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I am perfroming dump from Solaris 10 x86, using amanda 2.6.1
to an SL24/LTO4.
The following is cronological, some of the issues are separable.
The particular client with the issue is a MAC server with over
250Gig of data.
The dumps where taking a _l
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:49:47AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
>
> I attempted the following in the disklist
>
> trel /Users comp-user-tar
> #trel /treluser-tar
> trel /trelAM /trel {
> comp-user-tar
> exclude "[N-Z]*"
> }
>
> trel /trelNZ /trel
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:14:47PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> >> amrestore /dev/rmt/0n trel
> >
> > amrestore: 7: skipping FILE: date 20090702183001 host nlascar disk /boot
> > lev 1 comp .gz program /sbin/dump
> > amrestore: 8: resto
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>> amrestore /dev/rmt/0n trel
>
> amrestore: 7: skipping FILE: date 20090702183001 host nlascar disk /boot lev
> 1 comp .gz program /sbin/dump
> amrestore: 8: restoring FILE: date 20090702183001 host trel disk /Users lev 1
> comp .gz program /
I am perfroming dump from Solaris 10 x86, using amanda 2.6.1
to an SL24/LTO4.
The following is cronological, some of the issues are separable.
The particular client with the issue is a MAC server with over
250Gig of data.
The dumps where taking a _lot_ time, so I tried to divide the DLE
into 2
