> Perhaps, as the testing process gets started in the
> community version (no, folks, I haven't forgotten!),
> you can help us out with Ubuntu testing.
Just let me know...
>> By the way, maybe you could also answer this question: I need a
>> completely statically linked Amanda for some hosts. I
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:56:31PM +0200, Ralf Auer wrote:
> it's working now! Still kinda strange for me. What I did was the
> following:
> I purged the 'flex', 'bison' and 'libreadline5-dev' Ubuntu packages from
> my office machine. (Those packages are not installed on my laptop, where
> th
Hi Dustin,
it's working now! Still kinda strange for me. What I did was the
following:
I purged the 'flex', 'bison' and 'libreadline5-dev' Ubuntu packages from
my office machine. (Those packages are not installed on my laptop, where
the sources cleanly compiled yesterday).
After this purgi
Hi Dustin,
the 2.5.2p1 that produce this error were not from Ubuntu but from
the Amanda download page! Only the 2.5.1p1 sources have been downloaded
from Ubuntu. On some machines the Ubuntu sources compile only, when
libreadline5-dev is installed, on some machines they don't need
libreadl
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:30:55PM +0200, Ralf Auer wrote:
> I am running Ubuntu 7.04 on i386 on the server host. Tried gcc-4.1 and
> gcc-3.3. Downloaded 2.5.2p1 from Amanda website.
>
> This is how I configured 2.5.2p1 sources:
>
> ./configure
> --prefix=/opt/amanda
> --with-user=ama
Aha!
After installing 'libreadline5-dev' version 2.5.1p1 also compiles on my
clients now. But still no luck with 2.5.2p1 on server or clients...
Ralf Auer schrieb:
> Hi Dustin,
>
> now it's really getting wierd...
> As I wrote one message before, I could not compile 2.5.2p1 on my
> tapes
Hi Dustin,
now it's really getting wierd...
As I wrote one message before, I could not compile 2.5.2p1 on my
tapeserver and posted the error message. 2.5.1p1 did compile fine.
Now I tried to compile 2.5.1p1 also on my clients (same configure
options) and I get the SAME error message for 2
Hi Dustin,
no problem. I just didn't want to "spam" the 'users' mailing list with
the compiling details, but here we go:
I am running Ubuntu 7.04 on i386 on the server host. Tried gcc-4.1 and
gcc-3.3. Downloaded 2.5.2p1 from Amanda website.
This is how I configured 2.5.2p1 sources:
./co
Hi again,
thanks for the quick replies.
@ Steve: Of course the number of DLEs is not what possibly makes things
slower, but the amount of data thas has to be transferred to the tape
server. And that will significantly improve when I go from 2 DLEs setup
to 'real' backup, that's what I mea
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Ralf Auer wrote:
> I am just upgrading my Amanda from 2.4.5 to 2.5.1p1 (2.5.2p1 does not
> compile at all). I am very happy about the new 'ssh-auth' feature in
> 2.5. It works now in my test setup (only 2 DLEs).
Do you mind expounding on the compilat
I've been using ssh-auth since the earliest days of 2.5. Yes, the
dumps themselves go through the ssh tunnel. I have not noticed any
appreciable increase in backup time, at least on our system, which has
over 400 DLEs. (I'm not sure why the number of DLEs would be
relevant, really.)
Ralf Auer <
Ralf Auer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am just upgrading my Amanda from 2.4.5 to 2.5.1p1 (2.5.2p1 does not
> compile at all). I am very happy about the new 'ssh-auth' feature in
> 2.5. It works now in my test setup (only 2 DLEs).
>
> The question I have now, is, wether ssh is used ONLY for authen
Hi all,
I am just upgrading my Amanda from 2.4.5 to 2.5.1p1 (2.5.2p1 does not
compile at all). I am very happy about the new 'ssh-auth' feature in
2.5. It works now in my test setup (only 2 DLEs).
The question I have now, is, wether ssh is used ONLY for authentication,
or if ALL dumps as
13 matches
Mail list logo
