amdump failed

2004-03-30 Thread pascal thomas
Hallo again, what the hell ist this? FATAL dumper error [dumper PORT-DUMP: too many args: 16 != 12] with regards Pascal

Amdump failed ?

2001-03-08 Thread Olivier Collet
Everything looks fine but I seen this in my log amdump.1 driver: hdisk-state time 89.294 hdisk 0: free 49517860 dumpers 0 driver: QUITTING time 89.294 telling children to quit driver: send-cmd time 89.294 to dumper0: QUIT driver: send-cmd time 89.294 to dumper1: QUIT driver: send-cmd time 89.294

Re: amdump failed

2004-03-30 Thread Paul Bijnens
pascal thomas wrote: what the hell ist this? FATAL dumper error [dumper PORT-DUMP: too many args: 16 != 12] Spaces in names of include-directive are not (yet) allowed... -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM

Re: Amdump failed ?

2001-03-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>driver: send-cmd time 89.294 to taper: QUIT >writing taper command: Broken pipe >driver: FINISHED time 89.296 > >Is it normal ? the broken pipe. No, it's not normal and it's not right. Since you didn't say what version of Amanda you're using, it's a little hard to diagnose further. I'm pretty

Re: Amdump failed ?

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 10:51:29PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: > >driver: send-cmd time 89.294 to taper: QUIT > >writing taper command: Broken pipe > >driver: FINISHED time 89.296 > > > >Is it normal ? the broken pipe. > > No, it's not normal and it's not right. Since you didn't say what > ver

Re: Amdump failed ?

2001-03-09 Thread John R. Jackson
>It's always there after a: > driver: result time 5480.183 from taper: TAPE-ERROR [cannot overwrite activ >e tape DIRO-INCR-046] > >because the taper do an exit(1). It should wait for the QUIT command. Thanks for the info. I've just applied a patch to fix this problem: Log message:

make world -> amdump Failed

2002-02-24 Thread Tom Beer
Hi, after upgrading a freebsd box from 4.3 to 4.4 I get FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: strawberry /usr/sup lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr/sup offline on strawberry.system?] strawberry /usr/src lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr/src offline on strawberry.system?] <- snip -> but strawberry /etc

amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-23 Thread mack
Hi, I'm trying to set uo amanda for backing up just one computer. Amcheck runs fine, doesn't detect any problems, but when I try to run amdump, it's done within less than a second, and exits' because it doesn't get any estimates. Here's what amanda tells me about the dump: amdump: start at Fri

amdump failed last night

2012-03-09 Thread gene heskett
Version Amanda 4.0.0alpha.svn.4549 PClos-2012 All backups failed with the following message per DLE in the email: coyote /CoCo lev 0 FAILED [out of holding space in degraded mode] An su amanda -c "amcheck Daily" returns this: Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding

amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Jason Lavigne
Hello all,   This I my first time posting to this list and I am very new to Amanda, thank you for understanding if this is a rookie question.   I have setup Amanda to backup 8 FreeBSD servers, all the Amanda clients appear to be working just fine except for one server. For the life of m

Re: amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-23 Thread John R. Jackson
>... when I try to run amdump, >it's done within less than a second, and exits' because it doesn't get >any estimates. What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on the client? >Marion John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-25 Thread mack
Hi, >>... when I try to run amdump, >>it's done within less than a second, and exits' because it doesn't >>get >>any estimates. > > What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on the client? Not much, just this: sendsize: debug 1 pid 7788 ruid 26 euid 26 start time Tue Jan 23 15:45:21 2001 /usr/loca

Re: amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-25 Thread John R. Jackson
>Not much, just this: > >sendsize: debug 1 pid 7788 ruid 26 euid 26 start time Tue Jan 23 >15:45:21 2001 >/usr/local/libexec/sendsize: version 2.4.2 Then it may have died. Do you have any core files in /tmp/amanda? If so can you get a stack traceback with a debugger? If not (or even if so), t

Re: amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-26 Thread Marion Mack
Hi, On 25-Jan-2001 you wrote: > Then it may have died. Do you have any core files in /tmp/amanda? > If > so can you get a stack traceback with a debugger? No, there aren't any. > If not (or even if so), take a look at the matching amandad*debug > file. > You should see some lines something

Re: amdump failed: missing estimate

2001-01-26 Thread Marion Mack
Hi, the problem seems to be solved, everything works fine now, after creating /etc/amandates and making it read- and writable for amanda. Marion -- Der Herr hat uns nicht die Gnade zuteil werden lassen, daß wir uns wie andere Lebewesen durch saubere und keusche Zellteilung fortpflanzen können.

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-09 Thread gene heskett
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:04:59 PM gene heskett did opine: Additional info at bottom. > Version Amanda 4.0.0alpha.svn.4549 > PClos-2012 > > All backups failed with the following message per DLE in the email: > > coyote /CoCo lev 0 FAILED [out of holding space in degraded mode] > > An su am

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Which version of glib-2 are you using? The doc says g_queue_free_full was added in 2.32? We must find in which 2.31.? it was added? $ pkg-config glib-2.0 --modversion Jean-Louis On 03/09/2012 09:11 PM, gene heskett wrote: On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:04:59 PM gene heskett did opine: Addition

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Amanda do not use its own implementation of g_queue_free_full, so it can be removed with the attached patch. Jean-Louis On 03/09/2012 09:11 PM, gene heskett wrote: On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:04:59 PM gene heskett did opine: Additional info at bottom. Version Amanda 4.0.0alpha.svn.4549 PCl

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread gene heskett
On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:07:37 AM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > Amanda do not use its own implementation of g_queue_free_full, so it can > be removed with the attached patch. > > Jean-Louis Patch not yet complete, Jean-Louis Now it will build and install, but I did see a warning go by

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread gene heskett
On Saturday, March 10, 2012 09:39:30 AM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > Which version of glib-2 are you using? The doc says g_queue_free_full > was added in 2.32? > We must find in which 2.31.? it was added? > > $ pkg-config glib-2.0 --modversion 2.31.16 > Jean-Louis > > Additional info deri

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread Charles Curley
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:43:23 -0500 gene heskett wrote: > 27 places in 14 files. Too bad grep doesn't stand for Globally > Replace. :) For this I could be it being handier than a cold 6 pack > of Mikes Hard Lemonade! Look into sed. -- Charles Curley /"\ASCII Ribbon Campai

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 03/10/2012 10:43 AM, gene heskett wrote: On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:07:37 AM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: Amanda do not use its own implementation of g_queue_free_full, so it can be removed with the attached patch. Jean-Louis Patch not yet complete, Jean-Louis Now it will build and

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread gene heskett
On Saturday, March 10, 2012 06:48:25 PM Charles Curley did opine: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:43:23 -0500 > > gene heskett wrote: > > 27 places in 14 files. Too bad grep doesn't stand for Globally > > Replace. :) For this I could be it being handier than a cold 6 pack > > of Mikes Hard Lemonade! >

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread gene heskett
On Saturday, March 10, 2012 06:53:26 PM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > On 03/10/2012 10:43 AM, gene heskett wrote: > > On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:07:37 AM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > >> Amanda do not use its own implementation of g_queue_free_full, so it > >> can be removed with the a

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Do not change g_thread_create_new by g_thread_new, the are not the same API. You only get warning, keep g_thread_create. Jean-Louis On 03/10/2012 07:05 PM, gene heskett wrote: On Saturday, March 10, 2012 06:53:26 PM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: On 03/10/2012 10:43 AM, gene heskett wrote:

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-10 Thread gene heskett
On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:35:08 PM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > Do not change g_thread_create_new by g_thread_new, the are not the same > API. > > You only get warning, keep g_thread_create. 4593 also failed a few minutes ago. No patches applied. Amanda Tape Server Host Check -

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 03/10/2012 10:52 PM, gene heskett wrote: On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:35:08 PM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: Do not change g_thread_create_new by g_thread_new, the are not the same API. You only get warning, keep g_thread_create. 4593 also failed a few minutes ago. No patches applied.

Re: amdump failed last night

2012-03-11 Thread gene heskett
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 09:36:48 AM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > On 03/10/2012 10:52 PM, gene heskett wrote: > > On Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:35:08 PM Jean-Louis Martineau did opine: > >> Do not change g_thread_create_new by g_thread_new, the are not the > >> same API. > >> > >> You only

Re: amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:40:31PM -0500, Jason Lavigne enlightened us: > Hello all, > > > > This I my first time posting to this list and I am very new to Amanda, > thank you for understanding if this is a rookie question. > > > > I have setup Amanda to backup 8 FreeBSD servers, all the Am

RE: amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Jason Lavigne
r 03, 2003 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: amcheck passed however amdump failed On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:40:31PM -0500, Jason Lavigne enlightened us: > Hello all, > > > > This I my first time posting to this list and I am very new to Amanda, > thank you for

Re: amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:52:09PM -0500, Jason Lavigne enlightened us: > Could you point me to PORTS.USAGE? I have just found the docs at > http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html and I haven't read them yet, > only the man pages and I don't recall PORTS.USAGE. > * It's called PORT.USAGE, my bad

RE: amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Jason Lavigne
wever amdump failed On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:52:09PM -0500, Jason Lavigne enlightened us: > Could you point me to PORTS.USAGE? I have just found the docs at > http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html and I haven't read them yet, > only the man pages and I don't recall PORTS

RE: amcheck passed however amdump failed

2003-11-03 Thread Dana Bourgeois
Monday, November 03, 2003 1:13 PM > To: 'Matt Hyclak'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: amcheck passed however amdump failed > > > Awesome, I found the docs in my ports dir > (/usr/ports/misc/amanda-server/work/amanda-2.4.3b4/docs) in > FreeBSD however it appear

amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-04 Thread Mary N Koroleva
Hi, I run amcheck - it's all right. After I try to run amdump. test.ru:/etc/amanda/test/log | 513 >less amdump.1 amdump: start at Mon Mar 4 17:59:34 MSK/MSD 2002 planner: pid 6649 executable /usr/contrib/lib/amanda/planner version 2.4.1p1 planner: build: VERSION="Amanda-2.4.1p1" planner:

Re: amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-05 Thread Mary N Koroleva
According to Ignacio Dosil Lago: > Strange. > Was inetd up when you ran amdump? Yes, certaily. > Did you grant access to the tape server at the client via .amandahosts? test.ru:/etc/amanda | 554 >less .amandahosts test.ru amanda Have I filled .amandahosts correctly? > Have you check

Re: amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-05 Thread Mary N Koroleva
According to Ignacio Dosil Lago: > Strange. > Was inetd up when you ran amdump? Yes, certaily. > Did you grant access to the tape server at the client via .amandahosts? test.ru:/etc/amanda | 554 >less .amandahosts test.ru amanda Have I filled .amandahosts correctly? > Have you check

Re: amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-05 Thread Mary N Koroleva
According to Ignacio Dosil Lago: > I see ... .amandahosts is correctly filled but ... > Where is the amanda user home directory? Is .amandahosts there? It should. > (Hope this questions not to be too silly but I am a newby :-)) Yes, certainly ;-) test.ru:/etc/amanda | 599 >amcheck test Amanda T

Re: amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-05 Thread Mary N Koroleva
According to Ignacio Dosil Lago: > I see ... .amandahosts is correctly filled but ... > Where is the amanda user home directory? Is .amandahosts there? It should. > (Hope this questions not to be too silly but I am a newby :-)) Yes, certainly ;-) test.ru:/etc/amanda | 599 >amcheck test Amanda T

Re: amdump failed, Request to test.ru timed out.

2002-03-05 Thread Doug Silver
Check in /tmp/amanda for debugging files. Also do a 'kill -HUP' on the inetd process to make sure it rereads its configuration, and then run 'amcheck -c test'. Did you compile Amanda to use fully qualified hostnames -- if so make sure that you have that in the amandahosts file, you can even put