We need excellent and well-written documentation for linux backup software

2021-08-28 Thread Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: We need excellent and well-written documentation for linux backup software Good day from Singapore, Our company, which is a Systems Integrator (SI) in Singapore, is evaluating more than 30 different backup software for linux systems. We need excellent and well-written documentation for

Upload of amanda 3.5.1-8 to Debian with new documentation about auth=ssh.

2021-08-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, I just upload a new package of amanda 3.5.1-8 to Debian. The NEWS is: * That I have updated the README.Debian with instructions for auth=ssh and more simple examples. * Added to a patch to build amanda with a new libc6, this patch came from Fedora and maybe interesting to merge

Re: Documentation

2017-02-20 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2017-02-20 um 00:00 schrieb J Martin Rushton: > Hi, > > For some years now I've been running Amanda on my home network > (CentOS 6 & 7 machines, + 1 Raspberry Pi). I was wanting to make a > couple of changes and realis

Documentation

2017-02-19 Thread J Martin Rushton
Hi, For some years now I've been running Amanda on my home network (CentOS 6 & 7 machines, + 1 Raspberry Pi). I was wanting to make a couple of changes and realised that my documentation was out of date. I've been using "The Official Amanda Documentation" by Weichinger e

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-19 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 at 2:20pm, Clive Galway wrote Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? The one I have (dated june 26 2005, so I presume it is recent) is woefully poor and has in some cases made the install harder, not easier. Err, how many

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-16 Thread Graeme Humphries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must agree that the current documentation does little to minimize pain. I started to get into Amanda a year or two ago, and eventually dropped the ball after reading 60% of the documentation before I even began to touch the software. The amount of work required

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-16 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Clive Galway wrote: > > I would like to help out on the docs, but am currently very busy > writing my own open source project and just don't have much time. > Once I have set up our amanda system (which is a basic one linux server > setup with a DDS4 tape)

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-16 Thread Rick Parola
and NFS. Tells me you wasted your money on that certification. Any linux book will at least mention and cover some of those. While I do agree with you that generally speaking linux documentation should be better, I think a rant about it especially on the Amanda list (They do better than m

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 at 8:45pm, Gavin Henry wrote > > > Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? > > The one I have (dated june 26 2005, so I presume it is recent) is > > woefully poor and has in some cases made the install harder, not > > easier. &

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-16 Thread Clive Galway
re is going to be a collaborative effort to get some kind of quick start doc going, that would be best done on a wiki. >>> "Gavin Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/15/05 8:45 pm >>> > Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? > The one I have (

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-15 Thread mindfuq
* Clive Galway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 22:09]: > > Why is it that all linux documentation seems to be like this ? I > know catering to the lowest common denominator sucks, but at least > catering for the user with medium experience would be nice. > > 100+ man-hour

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-15 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 15 September 2005 09:49, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: [...] >Myself, given your, err, complaints, I think that perhaps a >quick-start chapter may be in order. Now where did I put those >circular tuits? 'Circular tuits' Chuckle, Thats classic Joshua. Gotta love it. :-) Yup, I'm back f

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-15 Thread Gavin Henry
> Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? > The one I have (dated june 26 2005, so I presume it is recent) is > woefully poor and has in some cases made the install harder, not > easier. You can always offer to help? Here is something I put together: http://fe

Re: poor documentation

2005-09-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 at 2:20pm, Clive Galway wrote > Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? > The one I have (dated june 26 2005, so I presume it is recent) is > woefully poor and has in some cases made the install harder, not > easier. Err, how many OSS proj

poor documentation

2005-09-15 Thread Clive Galway
Is there any documentation other than the official manual ? The one I have (dated june 26 2005, so I presume it is recent) is woefully poor and has in some cases made the install harder, not easier. Some examples: Chapter 2.2.1 - last line of page 33, start of page 34: it talks about the $prefix

Re: vtapes documentation

2005-09-05 Thread Gavin Henry
Doh!!! Been one of those days already, and it's only 11:30am here ;-) -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ > Gavin Henry wrote:

Re: vtapes documentation

2005-09-05 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Gavin Henry wrote: Hi Guys, Been a while, but that's due to Amanda being so rock solid!!! I am about to try a new setup using vtapes, as a new client won't be getting a tape drive for about 5 weeks, but would like Amanda setup now. Then when it arrives, we will be moving on to tapes. However,

vtapes documentation

2005-09-05 Thread Gavin Henry
Hi Guys, Been a while, but that's due to Amanda being so rock solid!!! I am about to try a new setup using vtapes, as a new client won't be getting a tape drive for about 5 weeks, but would like Amanda setup now. Then when it arrives, we will be moving on to tapes. However, I can't seem to find

RE: Questions re: the chg-scsi documentation

2005-08-13 Thread Scott R. Burns
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marcus Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 2:34 PM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Questions re: the chg-scsi documentation I was going through those pages a bit this morning and had a few questions..; Firstly, at the Configuration Notes it says I should

Questions re: the chg-scsi documentation

2005-08-13 Thread Marcus
I was going through those pages a bit this morning and had a few questions..; Firstly, at the Configuration Notes it says I should be able to get the changer value with modprobe sg. That command returns nothing; which doesn't seem right? But if I do a modprobe sg -l then I get: /lib/modules/2.6.8-

Re: Error in the documentation (Installation) ?

2005-05-06 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Guy, on Freitag, 06. Mai 2005 at 14:20 you wrote to amanda-users: GD> 2005/5/6, Stefan G. Weichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Please point out which part of the docs you refer to so I can look >> that up and correct things. >>> GD> The doc mentions /usr/local/bin/amcheck and /usr/local/bin/a

Re: Error in the documentation (Installation) ?

2005-05-06 Thread Guy Dallaire
2005/5/6, Stefan G. Weichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please point out which part of the docs you refer to so I can look > that up and correct things. >> GD> The doc mentions /usr/local/bin/amcheck and /usr/local/bin/amdup in >> GD> crontab. This CANNOT work as the binaries ar in /usr/local/bin

Re: Error in the documentation (Installation) ?

2005-05-05 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Guy Dallaire, on Donnerstag, 05. Mai 2005 at 22:19 you wrote to amanda-users: GD> According to the amanda doc (www.amanda.org) amanda is supposed to GD> install binaries in /usr/local/bin. GD> I have NO amanda binaries there. I used the standard configuration GD> build. Most binaries are in

Re: Error in the documentation (Installation) ?

2005-05-05 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:19:14PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote: > According to the amanda doc (www.amanda.org) amanda is supposed to > install binaries in /usr/local/bin. > > I have NO amanda binaries there. I used the standard configuration > build. Most binaries are in /usr/local/sbin or /usr/loca

Error in the documentation (Installation) ?

2005-05-05 Thread Guy Dallaire
According to the amanda doc (www.amanda.org) amanda is supposed to install binaries in /usr/local/bin. I have NO amanda binaries there. I used the standard configuration build. Most binaries are in /usr/local/sbin or /usr/local/libexec Is this NORMAL ? The doc mentions /usr/local/bin/amcheck and

Re: Dump ordering optimisation documentation

2004-08-31 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Jon, on Dienstag, 31. August 2004 at 23:30 you wrote to amanda-users: JL> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:14:40PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: >> Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation? >> >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&

Re: Dump ordering optimisation documentation

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Fedyk
Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:14:40PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&w=2 I don't know of any email messages included with the amanda docs. Perh

Re: Dump ordering optimisation documentation

2004-08-31 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:14:40PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&w=2 > I don't know of any email messages included with the amanda docs. Perhaps

Dump ordering optimisation documentation

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Fedyk
Is there any chance we can get this in the documentation? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106277015010167&w=2

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Kevin, on Dienstag, 24. August 2004 at 22:56 you wrote to amanda-users: KZ> Stefan, thank for taking the time to do this. In the spirit KZ> of bug-finding, I am unable to print page 93 of today's version of KZ> the postscript file. Errm, you mean, PDF instead of PostScript, don't you? I have

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread KEVIN ZEMBOWER
Stefan, thank for taking the time to do this. In the spirit of bug-finding, I am unable to print page 93 of today's version of the postscript file. Don't know if this is related to the error below. I'm using Adobe Acrobat 6.0 inside of IE 6.0 on a Windows XP platform (no flames; required on the

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Paul, on Dienstag, 24. August 2004 at 15:34 you wrote to amanda-users: papc> In a message dated: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:15:31 +0200 papc> "Stefan G. Weichinger" said: >>Just get the file at: >> >>http://www.oops.co.at/AMANDA-docs/index.html papc> Hmmm, ghostscript seems to have trouble convert

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread pll+amanda
In a message dated: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:15:31 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" said: >Just get the file at: > >http://www.oops.co.at/AMANDA-docs/index.html Hmmm, ghostscript seems to have trouble converting this to postscript: $ pdf2ps amanda.pdf amanda.ps Unknown operator: '. Error: /synta

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread pll+amanda
In a message dated: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:15:31 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" said: >I would prefer to just put the current pdf online, as I want to put >the xml-stuff online in early september. I want to avoid the >side-effects of distributing stuff per email ... > >I am very busy with other things

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-24 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 Aug 2004 23:58, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Hi, Gavin Henry, > > on Dienstag, 24. August 2004 at 00:26 you wrote to amanda-users: > > GH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > GH> Hash: SHA1 > > >> btw, the AMANDA-manpages will be added s

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Gavin Henry, on Dienstag, 24. August 2004 at 00:26 you wrote to amanda-users: GH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- GH> Hash: SHA1 >> btw, the AMANDA-manpages will be added soon ... GH> Me or you? GH> It will only take a hour if you provide your CSS or I can use mine? Didn't understand a

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-23 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > btw, the AMANDA-manpages will be added soon ... Me or you? It will only take a hour if you provide your CSS or I can use mine? - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1467 624141 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Paul, on Montag, 23. August 2004 at 15:58 you wrote to amanda-users: >>>>>> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, "Stefan" == Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: papc> Stefan> about one month has gone now, since I put a pre-release papc> Stefan> of "The Official A

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-23 Thread pll+amanda
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, "Stefan" == Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Stefan> about one month has gone now, since I put a pre-release Stefan> of "The Official AMANDA Documentation" online at Stefan> http://www.oops.co.at/AMANDA-docs/index.html Very

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at (SGI Irix additions)

2004-08-06 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Luc , on Freitag, 06. August 2004 at 03:23 you wrote to amanda-users: LL> Hello Stefan, LL> No not the email. There are a few corrections in the text I resent LL> you. You changed the format of the text and I corrected the wording to LL> ajust to your changes... LL> Thanks. LL> Stefan

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at (SGI Irix additions)

2004-08-05 Thread Luc Lalonde
Hello Stefan, No not the email. There are a few corrections in the text I resent you. You changed the format of the text and I corrected the wording to ajust to your changes... Thanks. Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Hi, Luc, on Donnerstag, 05. August 2004 at 15:59 you wrote to amanda-users: LL>

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at (SGI Irix additions)

2004-08-05 Thread Luc Lalonde
I think that it should go into the SGI-Irix section... Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Hi, Luc Lalonde, on Donnerstag, 05. August 2004 at 04:09 you wrote to amanda-users: LL> Hello Stefan, LL> Thanks for the enormous work that you've done putting together this LL> document. Thank you ... LL> I've to so

Re: AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at (SGI Irix additions)

2004-08-04 Thread Luc Lalonde
out one month has gone now, since I put a pre-release of "The Official AMANDA Documentation" online at http://www.oops.co.at/AMANDA-docs/index.html This was just meant as a ground for discussion (for amanda-core-members), but it seems to hit the needs of several more people: The hits at ww

AMANDA Documentation at www.oops.co.at

2004-08-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hello, amanda-users, about one month has gone now, since I put a pre-release of "The Official AMANDA Documentation" online at http://www.oops.co.at/AMANDA-docs/index.html This was just meant as a ground for discussion (for amanda-core-members), but it seems to hit the needs of se

Re: Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Gene Heskett, on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 23:52 you wrote to amanda-users: GH> There was at one time a site called frankenlinux.something that had a GH> somewhat expanded set of manpages/docs. I used them to get started GH> with years ago. They might be somewhat dated in that any new st

Re: Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 03 June 2004 17:33, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >Hi, Ivan, > >on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 22:52 you wrote to amanda-users: > >IP> Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit: >>> There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And >>> Reference Guide". > >IP> Is anybody working on it? > >I d

Re: Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Ivan, on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 22:52 you wrote to amanda-users: IP> Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit: >> There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And Reference >> Guide". IP> Is anybody working on it? I don't know of any current project, no. But I think about doing it mysel

Re: Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Ivan Petrovich
Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit: > There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And Reference > Guide". Is anybody working on it?

Re: Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Kris, on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 21:46 you wrote to amanda-users: KV> Does anyone know of a book or some online docs that explain KV> in detail how AMANDA works, how to use all of its tools, and how KV> to optimize / tweak it for a particular environment? The online KV> chapter of Unix B

Good Documentation anywhere?

2004-06-03 Thread Kris Vassallo
Does anyone know of a book or some online docs that explain in detail how AMANDA works, how to use all of its tools, and how to optimize / tweak it for a particular environment? The online chapter of Unix Backup and Recovery doesn't quite do it for me. Thx!

documentation

2003-08-14 Thread Marc Cuypers
Hi, Is there somewhere a schematic overview what the different programs do? -- Best regards, Marc.

Re: Q: amanda documentation / soft links vs backups

2003-03-05 Thread Paul Bijnens
Raúl Wild-Spain wrote: Hi! I've found into the amanda documentation (FAQ.gz) various ways to perform a backup. I've some doubts because my english is a little bad ( I'm spanish and my alternative language is french) and I would like to make some questions about this. The FAQ say

Q: amanda documentation / soft links vs backups

2003-03-05 Thread Raúl Wild-Spain
Hi! I've found into the amanda documentation (FAQ.gz) various ways to perform a backup. I've some doubts because my english is a little bad ( I'm spanish and my alternative language is french) and I would like to make some questions about this. The FAQ says the following:

Re: Tapeless Backup Documentation - call for volunteers

2003-01-02 Thread Niall O Broin
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:15:26PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > There are messages similar to the following, > posted frequently to the amanda-users list: > > There is not much documentation in setting up AMANDA > to be backuped up to a Hard Drive. I checked web sites, >

Tapeless Backup Documentation - call for volunteers

2003-01-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
There are messages similar to the following, posted frequently to the amanda-users list: There is not much documentation in setting up AMANDA to be backuped up to a Hard Drive. I checked web sites, the MAN pages, the mailing lists. And three weeks of trying to do this on my own, I need

Re: Documentation

2002-06-23 Thread Brad Tilley
t;Brad Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:29 AM > Subject: Documentation > > > > Hello, > > > > I am preparing amanda documentation for our office. The documents are > > specif

Re: Documentation

2002-06-22 Thread Eric Trager
On 19 Apr 2002, Marcos Teodoro Dias Junior wrote: > Hello, > > Where I can find some documentation at how to use amanda with tape > changers ? In the source tree, look in docs/TAPE.CHANGERS . - Eric

Re: Documentation

2002-04-19 Thread Eric Trager
On 19 Apr 2002, Marcos Teodoro Dias Junior wrote: > Hello, > > Where I can find some documentation at how to use amanda with tape > changers ? In the source tree, look in docs/TAPE.CHANGERS . - Eric

Documentation

2002-04-19 Thread Marcos Teodoro Dias Junior
Hello, Where I can find some documentation at how to use amanda with tape changers ? -- "Se vc conhece o inimigo e conhece a si mesmo, não precisa temer o resultado de cem batalhas. Se você se conhece mais não conhece o inimigo, para cada vitória ganha sofrerá também uma derrota. Se

Re: Documentation

2002-03-15 Thread John R. Jackson
>I did wrote a short doc on how to install amanda on Linux approx. >7 months ago , and I did post it on this listMaybe it got lost a >long the way :-) That depends on how you define "lost" :-) :-). I "found" your post. It's article 1562 out of 4911 in my "yet to be processed" Amanda folder.

Re: Documentation

2002-03-15 Thread Tien That Ton
Reply Hi, I did wrote a short doc on how to install amanda on Linux approx. 7 months ago, and I did post it on this listMaybe it got lost a long the way :-) Tien That Ton

Here's the Documentation

2002-03-14 Thread Brad Tilley
Here is the rough draft of my amanda documentation. It deals mostly with using amanda in a predominantly Windows based environment. This doc is far from complete. It lacks a lot, but here it is anyway with all of its imperfections. Amanda Backup Documentation By Brad Tilley [EMAIL

Re: Documentation

2002-03-14 Thread ahall
I have written two docuements. One on excluding data with amanda, and one on how to setup amanda to use gpg. The exclude doc is now available in the DOCS subdir, but it was about six months between when I finished it and a new version of amanda was released. Is there another location that docs

Re: Documentation (Yes, post it!)

2002-03-14 Thread Ruth Anne
a handful are interested in it. > > > > I disagree -- one of the things that I (and others I've talked to) have > > noticed is that while Amanda is feature rich, it's documentation is > > lacking. Why not post it somewhere so other's can read through it and >

Re: Documentation (Yes, post it!)

2002-03-14 Thread Eric Trager
hings that I (and others I've talked to) have > noticed is that while Amanda is feature rich, it's documentation is > lacking. Why not post it somewhere so other's can read through it and > potentially add to it. Even if it's just from the client/end-user > perspec

Re: Documentation

2002-03-14 Thread Doug Silver
it here? > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Brad Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:29 AM > > Subject: Documentation > > > > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: Documentation

2002-03-14 Thread Brad Tilley
t;Brad Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:29 AM > Subject: Documentation > > > > Hello, > > > > I am preparing amanda documentation for our office. The documents are > > specif

Re: Documentation

2002-03-13 Thread Robert SHEN
I'm not the one who produced the document, you should post on the mailing list - Original Message - From: "Lewis Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert SHEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: Re: Documentation >

Re: Documentation

2002-03-13 Thread Robert SHEN
Will it be possible to post it here? - Original Message - From: "Brad Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:29 AM Subject: Documentation > Hello, > > I am preparing amanda documentation for our office. The

Documentation

2002-03-13 Thread Brad Tilley
Hello, I am preparing amanda documentation for our office. The documents are specific to us, but general enough to probably be of use to others who have similar amanda implementations (50+ Windows end users and about six departmental Linux servers and workstations). Is there a place where I

Documentation Discrepancies

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Lussier
looking to see if Amanda could be useful to them. Granted, they could grab the source and read docs/*, but most want a quick summary. Since I'm not sure who&#