Vytas Janusauskas schreef:
Hi Paul,
This e-mail thread has produce quite a bit of response. All
appreciated. However I am still not clear if I can split my DLE's using
the include and exclude commands. I am under the impression that amdump
runs the backup as root. Should it therefore not
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:20:20AM -0500, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> This e-mail thread has produce quite a bit of response. All
> appreciated. However I am still not clear if I can split my DLE's
> using the include and exclude commands. I am under the impression
> that amdump
Hi Paul,
This e-mail thread has produce quite a bit of response. All
appreciated. However I am still not clear if I can split my DLE's
using the include and exclude commands. I am under the impression
that amdump runs the backup as root. Should it therefore not have
access to all director
On 2006-03-17 14:53, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
Hi Again,
It's taken me a couple of days to get the suggestions tested.
So this is my current DLE entries and output from the amanda report and
comments from amrecover: Why are the DLEs with the "includes"
failing? In the reports they claim to
Hi Again,
It's taken me a couple of days to get the suggestions tested.
So this is my current DLE entries and output from the amanda report
and comments from amrecover: Why are the DLEs with the
"includes" failing? In the reports they claim to be succeeding but
they are not doing what I w
On 3/15/06, Mitch Collinsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
>
> > That'a not fixed in 2.5.0, that will be done after the dumper-api get
> > implemented.
>
> dumper-api? I thought the story was that's being replaced with
> application-api.
>
> In a
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
That'a not fixed in 2.5.0, that will be done after the dumper-api get
implemented.
dumper-api? I thought the story was that's being replaced with
application-api.
In any case I offered a programmer's time 2 years ago to fix
this w/o waiting o
Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:44:50PM -0500, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: hal: [Can't open disk '/mnt/data06/Deforest3']
ERROR: hal: [No include for '/mnt/data
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:12, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:44:50PM -0500, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
>>> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>>>
>>> ERROR: hal: [Can't open disk '/mnt/data06/Deforest3'
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Mitch Collinsworth schrieb:
It's BAD for those of us who are trying to offer backups for machines
that aren't centrally managed.
It was discussed a bit on -hackers in
2004 - April and again in July. Solutions were suggested but never
agreed up
Mitch Collinsworth schrieb:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Sounds BAD.
>>
>> I'd like to know more on that ... is this a major issue for Amanda in
>> general ... do we have to do major patches ... what can we do ...
>
> It's BAD for those of us who are trying to offer bac
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Mitch Collinsworth schrieb:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
IIRC amcheck does NOT run some of its checks as root.
Thus if the amanda user running amcheck can not visit
/mnt/data06/Deforest3 and needed directories below that,
it could c
Mitch Collinsworth schrieb:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> IIRC amcheck does NOT run some of its checks as root.
>> Thus if the amanda user running amcheck can not visit
>> /mnt/data06/Deforest3 and needed directories below that,
>> it could cause errors like that above when amchec
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:44:50PM -0500, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: hal: [Can't open disk '/mnt/data06/Deforest3']
ERROR: hal: [No include for '/mnt/data06/Deforest3_PART1']
Client
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:44:50PM -0500, Vytas Janusauskas wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Listed below is what I get when I try to define a DLE with the
> include statement. However last night I ran it with the include line
> commented out and it backed up the complete Deforest3 data set as
> expected
Hi Paul,
Listed below is what I get when I try to define a DLE with the
include statement. However last night I ran it with the include line
commented out and it backed up the complete Deforest3 data set as
expected . However as soon as I add <
"include "./AirPhoto_Load_Tool" > to the dis
On 2006-03-13 12:53, Alexander Jolk wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
BTW, 240 DLE's is in danger to bump into the max UDP packet size for
estimates, which currently is 64K / 2 or about 32Kbytes...
Not on Linux though. I have currently 2200 DLEs approximately split 1:1
over two servers, and I've ne
Paul Bijnens wrote:
BTW, 240 DLE's is in danger to bump into the max UDP packet size for
estimates, which currently is 64K / 2 or about 32Kbytes...
Not on Linux though. I have currently 2200 DLEs approximately split 1:1
over two servers, and I've never had an UDP size problem.
BTW amanda ha
Vytas Janusauskas schreef:
Hi All,
I have been using Amanda (current version 2.4.4p3) for the last couple
of years without any major issues. However recently due to an influx of
new projects the volume of data has grown. What is happening is that
users are adding new directories to the data
19 matches
Mail list logo
