Gil Naveh wrote:
Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don’t understand an important
concept regarding Amanda.
I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
However, how does it knows which backup level to perform when a user
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:11:06AM -0600, Gil Naveh wrote:
> Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don't understand an important concept
> regarding Amanda.
>
> I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
> level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
>
> However, how doe
Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don’t understand an
important concept regarding Amanda.
I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
However, how does it knows which backup level to perform when a user
have a tape
More on the same story .. Im getting there :)
Seems that the bottleneck indeed was the gzip process ..
I've changed my disklist/amanda.conf to no longer compress the images, and
instead rely on the hardware compression in the LTO drive
(trading tape space for speed ;) ), and the results are rath
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:47:16PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) How does amanda decide which disks to dump first ?
>
> Basically, it starts 3 slow/large dumps (taken out of the end of the
> backup queue) in parallel with
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerhard den Hollander
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2001 06:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Priorities ?
I have a bunch of disks Im amanda-dumping
4 18G disks, a couple od smaller disks and a 420G RAID5 array
Now obviously even a level 3 dump of the 420G dsk array is going to take
On Jan 18, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore, I'd like ot tell amanda to start work on the 420G disk array
> first.
The only way to ensure it starts first is to get the others delayed
with starttime. But you probably don't want to do that. Consider
increasing m
Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of disks Im amanda-dumping
> 4 18G disks, a couple od smaller disks and a 420G RAID5 array
>
> Now obviously even a level 3 dump of the 420G dsk array is going to take
> longer than a 0 dump of the smalles disks.
>
> Therefore, I'd like ot tell am
I have a bunch of disks Im amanda-dumping
4 18G disks, a couple od smaller disks and a 420G RAID5 array
Now obviously even a level 3 dump of the 420G dsk array is going to take
longer than a 0 dump of the smalles disks.
Therefore, I'd like ot tell amanda to start work on the 420G disk array
firs
