Kevin D. Alford wrote:
I am running Amanda versions 2.4.2p2 on a AIX 5.1 system.
I have been getting these strange dump details, and would like
To resolve these problems. The following information is provided.
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
/-- thunder/home lev 1 STRANGE
...
? gtar: Removing
Title: RE: Strange Dumps?
I have upgraded gnutar version to 1.14 and everything works fine.
Thanx.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Valentine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 7/23/2004 6:03 PM
To: Paul Bijnens
Cc: Kevin D. Alford; Amanda Users
Subject: Re: Strange Dumps
>Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean FAILURE
>AND STRANGE DUMP ...
Amanda watches the stderr lines from the backup program and pattern
matches them against things it expects (normal). Every other line is
considered "strange". If the backup failed or there were any st
> "John" == John R Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean
>> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP ...
John> Amanda watches the stderr lines from the backup program and
John> pattern matches them against things it expects (n
On Nov 4, 2000, Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still using 2.4.1 (does anyone know if there are 2.4.2 rpms
> available yet ?).
You *might* be able to find them at rawhide.redhat.com
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Develo
On 4 Nov 2000, Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
> available yet ?). Anyway, I was wondering if there is a way for me to
> adjust the pattern which determines which messages are "normal". For
> instance, I would like to define "socket ignored" as normal, and
> other such messages.
Have a look at messages a
>I using amanda to backup several servers, but now some of my disks
>started signaling the following error. Those are vx filesystems of
>an HP 10.20 ...
>| vxdump: SIGSEGV: ABORTING!
This is either an HP or Veritas (is that who does VX?) problem.
You'll probably need to talk to your vendor a
On Saturday 04 January 2003 14:15, C. Bensend wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
> I'm having an odd problem with one of my backup clients.
>Every single night (I back up nightly), one particular partition
>ends up with a "STRANGE" report, saying that a file (pick a file,
>any file) has changed while it wa
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a file
> are not supported by samba because they are not supported by the
> underlying (usually vfat) file system. So apparently, some dummy
> value g
On Sunday 05 January 2003 00:24, C. Bensend wrote:
>Comments inline.
>
>On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a
>> file are not supported by samba because they are not supported
>> by the underlying (usually vfat)
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:22:49AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I get around that problem here with the use of an extra directory on
> one of the drives here that has an rsync'd image of the stuff on
> the other machine I use mainly for a firewall that I would normally
> use samba for the bac
11 matches
Mail list logo