[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
goscinny //tweety/notesdata$ server-compress
goscinny being the backuphost
Just a note: It doesn't have to be the backup-server! It could be any host. E.
g. if you have a department connected through by a small bandwith, it should
be a host inside the remote network
This is a working example :
disklist :
goscinny //tweety/notesdata$ server-compress
goscinny being the backuphost
//tweety/notesdata the windows server + sharename (note the $ for a hidden
share)
server-compress is the dumptype
/etc/amandapass
//tweety/notesdata$ user%passwd
user and pass
On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:10, Shashi Kanbur wrote:
>hi, what i found was that if I extract the tape file onto disk
>with amrestore /dev/nst0 moa
>
>and then
>
>dd if= bs=32k skip=1 of=a
>and then tar xvf a it works.
>I tried to combine the two commands
>dd if bs=32k skip=1 | tar xvf
IIRC, the
Hi Shashi!
> dd if= bs=32k skip=1 of=a
> and then tar xvf a it works.
> I tried to combine the two commands
> dd if bs=32k skip=1 | tar xvf
Try this...
dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | tar xvf -
Good luck!
Glenn
--
Glenn E. Sieb
System Administrator
Lumeta Corporation
+1 732 357-3514 (V)
+1 732 564-0731
hi, what i found was that if I extract the tape file onto disk
with amrestore /dev/nst0 moa
and then
dd if= bs=32k skip=1 of=a
and then tar xvf a it works.
I tried to combine the two commands
dd if bs=32k skip=1 | tar xvf
but it doesnt like it. Any suggestions here?
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Gene He
On Thursday 15 January 2004 13:17, Shashi Kanbur wrote:
>Im using amanda version 2.4.4p1 on a linux amanda server and backing
> up mainly linux machines but also two irix machines. the disklist
> entry for these states
>
>/scr comp-home-tar
>
>and the log file states that the backup was successful.
Title: na
. U N I V E R S I T Y . D I P L O M A S .
Do you want to increase your earnings, and gain more respect from EVERYONE?
We can assist with Diplomas from prestigious non-accredited universities based on your present knowledge and life experience.
No required tests, clas
Title: RE: hi,i wanna unsubsribe,but why not ok?
I gave
up unsubscribing. I just set a rule in my outlook to delete mail.
Hell, my company simply changed Domain names (after I subscribed) and that is
what is screwing me.
-Original Message-From: Steve Macpherson
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: hi,i wanna unsubsribe,but why not ok?
Me too. I'm getting email forwarded from a previous company so figured I'm not unsubscribing from the proper email address. But it should be easy enough to verify (send email to my old address, forward to new and I reply).
Is th
On Friday 11 October 2002 06:22, O-Zone wrote:
>Hi All,
>i'm a new user Amanda user. I've got installed 2.4.3 and i'm
> unable to get it working correctly. I've got a SCSI TAPE STREAMER
> Sony SDT-9000 with Sequential-Access attacched to scsi tape
> device st0. There's no disk tape changer. So i'l
Personally, my largest source of "delete-able" mail by far is this list.
That is not a comment upon its overall value, just that most of what I get
on a daily basis does not apply to me. Typically either I do not have the
configuration being inquired about (for example, we do not use tape
changer
ENOUGH ALREADY...
Take this battle off list, please.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hi
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Spicer, Kevin wrote:
> One possibility
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:38:03PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 09:14:54 (-0500), Dave Sherohman wrote: ]
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > > I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> > > e-mai
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Spicer, Kevin wrote:
> One possibility is to allow anonymous users to post through a web page, but only
>list members to post via email. If a non-member attempts to post via email they
>should recieve a polite bounce referring them to the website.
Seem
Multiple people have mentioned similar ideas: procmail and a filter.
I just set up spamassassin (http://www.spamassassin.org/) a week or so
ago and it has correctly identified all spam to this list, and almost
all spam vs. non-spam I've received on the rest of my accounts, too.
It sets up very ni
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 16:08:22 (+0100), Spicer, Kevin wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: hi
>
> One possibility is to allow anonymous users to post through a web
> page, but only list members to post via email. If a non-member
> attempts to post via email they should recieve
[ On Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 09:14:54 (-0500), Dave Sherohman wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: hi
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> > e-mail from known abusers, dial-u
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 15:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hi
There is such a thing as being overly paranoid...
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> e-mail from known abusers, d
There is such a thing as being overly paranoid...
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:46:37PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I beg to differ. List servers should be no more tolerant of accepting
> e-mail from known abusers, dial-up/DSL/cable addresses,
ITYM "ISP DHCP pools". A static IP address is a sta
On Monday 09 September 2002 14:59, Rebecca Pakish wrote:
>Seems the email ABOUT the spam is taking up more of my time than
> the spam itself.
>
>While I've gotten the names of a few more open source anti-spam
> products...I think the ultimate solution is to send complaints to
> the postmaster inst
[ On Monday, September 9, 2002 at 13:18:23 (-0500), Brandon D. Valentine wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: hi
>
> Our respective tolerance levels are irrelevant to the issue at hand.
> Spam filtering is the responsibility of the recipient, not an
> intermediary like the Amanda listserv.
Christ, what does this have to do with Amanda - take it offline.
--
Sam Nicolary
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote:
> > Our respective tolerance levels are irrelevant to the issue at hand.
> > Spam filtering is the responsibility of the recipient, not an
> > intermediar
add these great suggestions and
explanations to the FAQ-o-matic and move on.
-Original Message-
From: Brandon D. Valentine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Jon LaBadie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hi
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>Each o
> Our respective tolerance levels are irrelevant to the issue at hand.
> Spam filtering is the responsibility of the recipient, not an
> intermediary like the Amanda listserv.
I really disagree with that. In the arena of "spam filtering" it's better to
have as many bottlenecks as possible. By a
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>Each of us has different tolerance levels, this is not reaching my serious
>irritation point.
[ Not directed at Jon since he was not the one complaining. ]
Our respective tolerance levels are irrelevant to the issue at hand.
Spam filtering is the responsi
> I have too much time on my hands. The list messages are
> saved automatically
> on my system and I just scanned my archive since June 1.
> Total of 2650+ messages.
> I found less than twenty I could easily identify as spam.
>
> That means about 1 per 125 messages, or 1.5 per week for the
>
Honestly, it may seem a bit presumptuous, but most of us are probably on
unix mail servers. It also seems obvious that most of us probably use
procmail.
That being the case, might I suggest using Spambouncer?
http://www.spambouncer.org. Just add /path/to/spambouncer/folder/sb.rc to
your list o
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:44:54AM -0400, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote:
> I really think spam control is necessary here. This mailing list is by far
> the most spammed list I subscribe to (I subscribe to about twenty lists). I
> never receive any spam from most of the other lists, but ple
Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote:
> I really think spam control is necessary here.
Done.
=;-)
On Monday 09 September 2002 08:44, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM
wrote:
>I really think spam control is necessary here. This mailing list
> is by far the most spammed list I subscribe to (I subscribe to
> about twenty lists). I never receive any spam from most of the
> other lists, but plenty o
I really think spam control is necessary here. This mailing list is by far
the most spammed list I subscribe to (I subscribe to about twenty lists). I
never receive any spam from most of the other lists, but plenty on this one.
I know, I've mentioned this before, and a couple people have critici
31 matches
Mail list logo
