e.be
http://www.mobileware.be
"Dominique Arpin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/07/2005 18:18
To
"Montagni, Giovanni"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject
Re: Hostname lookup failed
> Hi to all,
> I ha
> Hi to all,
> I have a problem with amanda.
>
>
> In december i've set-up amanda to backup the same machine that have the
> tape drive. Everything worked fine but today amcheck give me this error:
>
>
> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> -
> NOTE: skipping tape-writable t
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 17:24 +0200, Montagni, Giovanni wrote:
> ERROR: auriga: [addr 172.30.2.195: hostname lookup failed]
Ok...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] local]# ping auriga
> PING auriga.manord.com (172.30.2.195) 56(84) bytes of data.
Your ping test is equivalent to doing "host auriga". What Amanda i
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:21:28PM +0200, Leonid Shulov enlightened us:
> All time amanda did backup from note0002.
> And now amcheck return me:
>
> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> -
> Holding disk /home/amanda/tmp: 234693144 KB disk space available, using
> 213721624
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:15:47PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
>I think this is saying that on host samba2 it could not take IP address
>10.0.1.2 and convert that back to a host name. That IP address should
>be the IP address of the machine that connected to samba2, i.e. your
>tape server (wher
> ERROR: samba2: [addr 10.0.1.2: hostname lookup failed]
I think this is saying that on host samba2 it could not take IP address
10.0.1.2 and convert that back to a host name. That IP address should
be the IP address of the machine that connected to samba2, i.e. your
tape server (where you ran a
Oops!
> To disable it completely, I think you'd need to hack the source.
Obvously you don't need to but I wouldn't if I were you :-)
DSL
--
CWA - Chin Waggers Association
"Let's sit around and complain about something.
Our topic for today is: ADSL...h...that `L'
stands for Linux doesn'
Hmmm..
To disable it completely, I think you'd need to hack the source.
DSL
On Mar 13, 2001, "Charlie Zhu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But how can I disable it, I meaning not using reverse DNS lookup?
Add it to /etc/hosts, and configure the name resolver to look up
`files' first. I.e., you don't disable it, you get it to do The Right
Thing (TM).
If you really mean to
But how can I disable it, I meaning not using reverse DNS lookup?
--Charlie
- Original Message -
From: "David Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charlie Zhu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Amanda Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13,
> "David" == David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> If that doesn't work, try dig 83.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
dig -x 192.168.0.83 is less of a mouthful. :-)
Ben
Charlie!
> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>
> ERROR: office: [addr 192.168.0.83: hostname lookup failed]
> Client check: 1 host checked in 0.109 seconds, 1 problem found
>
> (brought to you by Amanda 2.4.2)
>
> But 'office' is really pingable in fact,
What d
>Is it possible that the error message could be improved?
Sure. Do you have a suggestion?
For starters, it should state that the error is coming from the client, not
from amcheck on the tape server. Something like:
"Client-side error: unable to perform reverse lookup on ".
Ben
>Is it possible that the error message could be improved?
Sure. Do you have a suggestion?
I'm not sure what 2.5 will say about this. The new security framework
has significantly altered the flow in this area.
>Ben
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It says that when Amanda tried to do a reverse lookup (IP
203.24.38.228 back to a host name), it failed.
Ahh. Problem sorted, thanks. Name service had died at that machine's site.
Is it possible that the error message could be improved?
Being able to ping the host is irrelevant. I as
>ERROR: metro: [addr 203.24.38.228: hostname lookup failed]
FYI, this is reported from the client side, so you need to do your
testing there, not on the server.
>This is nonsense -- I can ping the host, so my resolver is not broken.
>What else can cause this?
It says that when Amanda tried to d
>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:24:52 -0600 (CST)
>From: Joi Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>I'm pretty sure that all (UNIX) versions of nslookup uses gethostbyname();
>>...
>I'm not sure of this at all. On our internal machines, various breeds
>of linux and solaris, nslookup doesn't return an answer if
>Ok, i will test this. But, did nslookup not use them ?
No, I don't think nslookup uses gethostby*. I've always been under the
impression nslookup only does DNS queries, which are the layer below
the gethostby* routines. I wouldn't, for instance, use it to debug an
NIS problem.
It's entirely p
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, David Wolfskill wrote:
>I'm pretty sure that all (UNIX) versions of nslookup uses gethostbyname();
>I'm less confident about their use of gethostbyaddr(). (I'm pretty sure
>that there have been some versions of nslookup that would try to do a
>gethostbyname() using an IP add
>From: Thorsten Flick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:37:49 +0100
>DNS is running well. and i administer it for myself.
Good -- reducing the effects of "middlemen" helps get work done. :-}
>> [stuff about gethostbyname() & gethostbyaddr()...]
>Ok, i will test this. But, did ns
> >Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
> >
> >ERROR: intranet: [addr 192.168.1.42: hostname lookup failed]
> >Client check: 3 hosts checked in 0.318 seconds, 1 problem found.
> >-
> >Server and Client are running the same Server-Version.
>
> OK; so fix the DNS (or
>From: Thorsten Flick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:20:00 +0100
>i have a new Problem if i want to include another host in my backup.
>amcheck says the following :
>--
>Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>
>ERROR: intranet: [addr 192.168.1.42:
22 matches
Mail list logo
