I only do HW compression. I tried the software compression once before and
it was excruciating slow. I have a newer tape server with many more cores
so maybe I should give SW compression another try.The big question is how
much better is the SW compression than the HW compression? What do I gain.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:24:01AM +0300, Toomas Aas wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 "McGraw, Robert P" wrote:
>
> >
> >I use hardware compression to max the size of the tape.
> >Uncompressed the tape is 800GB compressed the theoretical max size
> >is 1.6TB. I know that I will not get the
Hello!
On Thu, 23 May 2013 "McGraw, Robert P" wrote:
I use hardware compression to max the size of the tape. Uncompressed
the tape is 800GB compressed the theoretical max size is 1.6TB. I
know that I will not get the 1.6TB.
In the amanda.conf file I tell amanda that my tape is "length 1
Robert,
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:04:29AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:59:33 +
> "McGraw, Robert P" wrote:
>
> > Why does amanda stop at %52 when I still have 1.5TB of data in the
> > holding disk to write to the tape? It is hard to believe that the
> > LTO4 compr
On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:59:33 +
"McGraw, Robert P" wrote:
> Why does amanda stop at %52 when I still have 1.5TB of data in the
> holding disk to write to the tape? It is hard to believe that the
> LTO4 compression is so bad that I am not getting any compression at
> all.
It would be if you h
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 01:59:33PM +, McGraw, Robert P wrote:
> Amanda Server Info:
>
> Thu May 23 05:36:00 2013: amandad: build: VERSION="Amanda-3.2.3"
> Thu May 23 05:36:00 2013: amandad:BUILT_DATE="Tue Feb 5 17:10:59
> EST 2013" BUILT_MACH=""
> Thu May 23 05:36:00 2013: ama
Robert,
Do amanda report a tape error?
What it doesn't put on tape? dump from the current run or from previous run?
You give us nothing to look at it, can you post the amdump.? log file?.
Jean-Louis
On 05/23/2013 09:59 AM, McGraw, Robert P wrote:
Amanda Server Info:
Thu May 23 05:36:00 2013: