RE: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-08 Thread Onotsky, Steve x55328
-Original Message- From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda- us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel Sent: July-06-10 08:29 To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Re: Stopping Autoresponders From: Onotsky, Steve x55328 steve.onot...@broadridge.com Subject

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-08 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 08 July 2010, Onotsky, Steve x55328 wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda- us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel Sent: July-06-10 08:29 To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Re: Stopping Autoresponders From: Onotsky

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-06 Thread Greg Troxel
away. Here's what was successfully delivered (I don't think any more were rejected at the MTA level). From: Mart Meier (mart.me...@sorainen.com) mart.me...@sorainen.com Subject: Out of Office: Stopping Autoresponders To: Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 04:10:40 +0300 From

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-06 Thread Gene Heskett
that these systems typically send replies right away. Here's what was successfully delivered (I don't think any more were rejected at the MTA level). From: Mart Meier (mart.me...@sorainen.com) mart.me...@sorainen.com Subject: Out of Office: Stopping Autoresponders To: Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com

RE: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-06 Thread Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
On Friday, July 02, 2010 11:11 AM, Dustin wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote: Finally, is this problem big enough to matter (I guess I will find out with *this* e-mail message ... :)), albeit some of you all do seem to think so! I get about one a day, so in

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote: On Friday, July 02, 2010 11:11 AM, Dustin wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote: Finally, is this problem big enough to matter (I guess I will find out with *this* e-mail message ... :)),

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-05 Thread Greg Troxel
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com writes: On Friday 02 July 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: n On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com Often subscribers do not know that their employers are running a broken email server, so the best way to stop this is to kindly

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-05 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote: I'll report back in a few days how many bounces I got from this message. Please do. Hopefully Todd's changes have reduced this number significantly. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 05 July 2010, Greg Troxel wrote: Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com writes: On Friday 02 July 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: n On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com Often subscribers do not know that their employers are running a broken email server, so

Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Next question off topic, how do we teach list members it is very poor form to go off on holiday and set an out of office auto-reply pointed at a mailing list, this will get me 5 or 6 of them in the next 10 minutes.  As

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote: Finally, is this problem big enough to matter (I guess I will find out with *this* e-mail message ... :)), albeit some of you all do seem to think so! I get about one a day, so in general,

RE: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
[mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Dustin J. Mitchell Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:04 AM To: amanda-users Subject: Stopping Autoresponders On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Next question off topic, how do we teach list members it is very poor

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 02.07.10 19:44 schrieb(en) Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net): Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 July 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Next question off topic, how do we teach list members it is very poor form to go off on holiday and set an out of office auto-reply pointed at a mailing list, this

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 July 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote: Finally, is this problem big enough to matter (I guess I will find out with *this* e-mail message ... :)), albeit some of you all do seem to

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 July 2010, Albrecht Dreß wrote: Am 02.07.10 19:44 schrieb(en) Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net): Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Am 02.07.10 21:13 schrieb(en) Gene Heskett: Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the existence of the 'List-ID' header. Mailman, iirc, also adds 'X-BeenThere'. Sieve, as an example, is able to deal with them properly

RE: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
...@aeris.net) Cc: amanda-users Subject: Re: Stopping Autoresponders On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) syed.hos...@aeris.net wrote: Finally, is this problem big enough to matter (I guess I will find out with *this* e-mail message ... :)), albeit some of you

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Todd Kover
Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the existence of the 'List-ID' header. Mailman, iirc, also adds

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:05:31PM -0400, Todd Kover wrote: Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 July 2010, Albrecht Dreß wrote: Am 02.07.10 21:13 schrieb(en) Gene Heskett: Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the existence of the 'List-ID' header. Mailman, iirc, also adds 'X-BeenThere'. Sieve, as an

Re: Stopping Autoresponders

2010-07-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 July 2010, Todd Kover wrote: Hmmm ... can auto-responders distinguish between normal user e-mail and e-mail from a mailing list? Yes, if the list processor implements rfc2919 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919); then simply check for the existence of the 'List-ID'