> Isn't this situation better suited by implementing disk quota ?
Unfortunately, the sources in question are Windows shares based on desktop
machines. Hence our real, 'direct' control is limited to the server side
(via. some kind of 'size throttling' through Amanda and/or SMB), or in
creating
* Joshua Baker-LePain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040308 11:48]:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 at 11:29am, Daniel Bentley wrote
> > Is there any way to put a 'size cap' on the amount of data being backed up
> > from one particular source (or -all- sources, at that)? There's a big
> > difference between 'Could y
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 at 11:29am, Daniel Bentley wrote
> Currently running Amanda for backups of desktop shares. The problem we
> come across is amount of tape used by certain individuals (mostly of the
> 'managerial persuasion'). We have asked these individuals to limit the
> size of data kept
Currently running Amanda for backups of desktop shares. The problem we
come across is amount of tape used by certain individuals (mostly of the
'managerial persuasion'). We have asked these individuals to limit the
size of data kept in their shares many times, but they always 'creep up'
above
