This is what I'm getting when I try to do an amlabel to a new tape. Is this
an amlabel problem or a tape drive problem?
$ amlabel Daily1 Daily1-09
rewinding, reading label, reading label: Value too large for defined data
type
rewinding, writing label Daily1-09
amlabel: writing label: In
Hi! I have installed amanda on my server host. The server is conected to
a tape device. I have created a configuration named DiariaPrueba. I have
configured all parameters in amanda.conf and I want to label only one
tape to make tests before. In my amanda.conf I have configures de
parameter lab
Hello Amanda users,
I had the jukebox I use on one of my SGI/IRIX Amanda servers fail
and we reverted to the attached standalone SDLT 220.
I modified amanda.conf to use the different tape drive and to
not use any changer config.
I was able to label (one/day) a few tapes (and write them that eve
I am installing amanda for the first time and have problems labeling tapes for
it. I get the error message:
amlabel: could not load tapelist "/etc/amanda/normal/tapelist"
This seems strange since it is the first tape I try to label and therefore
there is no tapelist file and there should not be o
When I try to label a tape, I get the following:
hcuxtstest01% amlabel archive archive00
rewinding
amlabel: no tape online
Amanda is installed and configured on SUN Ultra I, Solaris 8. I don't have a tape
drive physically connected to this machine, I am accessing a tape device on another
SUN
I want to add some new virtual tapes, but I got:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Reading label...
Found an empty tape.
amlabel: Can't use an undefined value as a subroutine reference at
/usr/sbin/amlabel line 120.
--8<---cut here---end---
>This is what I'm getting when I try to do an amlabel to a new tape. Is this
>an amlabel problem or a tape drive problem?
What version of Amanda? What OS?
>rewinding, reading label, reading label: Value too large for defined data type
I *think* what this says is that amlabel wa
]'
Subject: Re: amlabel problem
>This is what I'm getting when I try to do an amlabel to a new tape. Is
this
>an amlabel problem or a tape drive problem?
What version of Amanda? What OS?
>rewinding, reading label, reading label: Value too large for defined data
type
I *
Natalia García Nebot wrote:
> Hi! I have installed amanda on my server host. The server is conected to
> a tape device. I have created a configuration named DiariaPrueba. I have
> configured all parameters in amanda.conf and I want to label only one
> tape to make tests before. In my amanda.conf I
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 at 12:15pm, Natalia García Nebot wrote
Hi! I have installed amanda on my server host. The server is conected to a
tape device. I have created a configuration named DiariaPrueba. I have
configured all parameters in amanda.conf and I want to label only one tape to
make tests
On Thursday 17 August 2006 03:15, Natalia García Nebot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi! I have installed amanda on my server host. The server is conected to
> a tape device. I have created a configuration named DiariaPrueba. I have
> configured all parameters in amanda.conf and I want to label onl
Brian Cuttler schrieb:
> Hello Amanda users,
>
> I had the jukebox I use on one of my SGI/IRIX Amanda servers fail
> and we reverted to the attached standalone SDLT 220.
>
> I modified amanda.conf to use the different tape drive and to
> not use any changer config.
>
> I was able to label (one/d
Stefan,
I didn't realize the amlabel command wrote a log, I have it,
unfortunately not as informative as one might like in these
circumstances.
samar 5# more amlabel.20080229105753.debug
amlabel: debug 1 pid 873486 ruid 0 euid 0: start at Fri Feb 29 10:57:53 2008
amlabel: writing label: Invali
Hi, Erik,
on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
EPO> I am installing amanda for the first time and have problems labeling tapes for
EPO> it. I get the error message:
EPO> amlabel: could not load tapelist "/etc/amanda/normal/tapelist"
Do you really want to keep your c
Hi, Erik,
on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
EPO> The command I issue from the amanda user is:
EPO> amlabel /usr/sbin/amlabel normal normal00
EPO> and it doesn't help to use the force flag. What am I doing wrong?
Oops, I shot too fast.
The syntax is
/usr/sbin/a
** Reply to message from "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17
Feb 2004 11:55:19 +0100
> Hi, Erik,
>
> on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> EPO> The command I issue from the amanda user is:
>
> EPO> amlabel /usr/sbin/amlabel normal normal00
>
>
** Reply to message from "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17
Feb 2004 11:54:09 +0100
> Hi, Erik,
>
> on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> EPO> I am installing amanda for the first time and have problems labeling tapes for
> EPO> it. I get the e
** Reply to message from "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17
Feb 2004 11:54:09 +0100
> Hi, Erik,
>
> on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 11:21 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> EPO> I am installing amanda for the first time and have problems labeling tapes for
> EPO> it. I get the e
Hi, Erik,
on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 12:06 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> Do you really want to keep your config-files in /etc/amanda?
>> The default points to /usr/local/etc/amanda, for example.
>>
EPO> Anything wrong in that? That's where the sample config is located. Of course I
EPO> can
** Reply to message from "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17
Feb 2004 14:05:11 +0100
> Hi, Erik,
>
> on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 12:06 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> >> Do you really want to keep your config-files in /etc/amanda?
> >> The default points to /usr/local/etc/
Hi, Erik,
on Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 at 14:19 you wrote to amanda-users:
EPO> I realize I have a lot to learn. I am new to Linux and before I can move my
EPO> production to Linux I need a reliable backup system.
Very reasonable ;)
EPO> I am all for standards, so I'll see to that my system co
** Reply to message from "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17
Feb 2004 14:29:51 +0100
> Don't fear the steps you have to take.
> I assume you try to install and setup the most recent AMANDA-release
> 2.4.4p2. This should take most of the standard-issues off your
> shoulders.
>
>
Dave,
>Amanda is installed and configured on SUN Ultra I, Solaris 8. I don't
>have a tape drive physically connected to this machine, I am accessing
>a tape device on another SUN box.
Run amlabel on the machine with the tape drive...
You anyway need physical access to that machine, if only to
When reporting a problem, can you at least report which version you are
using.
We also need a way to reproduce the issue, the minum it hat case is the
amlabel command line argument and all setting related to the changer.
Bug get fixed a lot faster when enough information to reproduce the
iss
Stefan, et al,
We have decided that the standalone tape drive has failed, it
will not read nor write known good tapes.
We are thinking of allocating a large NFS partition (I know, bad
mojo and performace but apparently/supposedly its going to be temporary)
and just letting the files live in the
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Stefan, et al,
We have decided that the standalone tape drive has failed, it
will not read nor write known good tapes.
We are thinking of allocating a large NFS partition (I know, bad
mojo and performace but apparently/supposedly its going to be temporary)
and just lettin
Chris,
I _so_ love amanda!
thank you!
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:43:50PM -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
>
> Brian Cuttler wrote:
> >Stefan, et al,
> >
> >We have decided that the standalone tape drive has failed, it
> >will not read nor writ
Brian Cuttler schrieb:
> Chris,
>
> I _so_ love amanda!
Nice to hear that ;)
Stefan
28 matches
Mail list logo
