On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Yes this is much better - log is attached.
Fixed up in
http://github.com/djmitche/amanda/commit/z12092.patch
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Yes I hope so. What version should I go for ?
Thanks Gunnar Gunnarsson
Incidentally, I can't help but notice that you're backing up disks named
/var/amanda/amandatapes/ems/slotNN. Will amvault be able to help you out?
If so, could you find some time to test it before I set sail in a week and
Incidentally, I can't help but notice that you're backing up disks
named /var/amanda/amandatapes/ems/slotNN. Will amvault be able to
help you out? If so, could you find some time to test it before I set
sail in a week and a half?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Yes I hope so. What version should I go for ?
This - or rather a version improved by Jean-Louis' suggestion to print
the more precise flush successfully retried - will be in the next
3.2.0 beta, which we're
Hi,
I upgraded Amanda version from 2.6.1 to 3.1.2 and amreport reports:
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
hansabck /var/amanda/amandatapes/ems1/slot13 lev 0 partial taper: No space
left on device
hansabck /var/amanda/amandatapes/ems1/slot65 lev 0 partial taper: No space
left on device
But they are
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
I upgraded Amanda version from 2.6.1 to 3.1.2 and amreport reports:
...
But they are written on the next tape, I'm not using tape spanning.
OK .. so what's the problem?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
It is reported as failed see below and those parts are added twice - filesystem
66 parts 68.
In earlier version it is reported correctly.
These dumps were to tapes HANSA-ARKIVE-9, HANSA-ARKIVE-10, HANSA-ARKIVE-11.
The next 4 tapes Amanda expects to use are: HANSA-ARKIVE-12, HANSA-ARKIVE-13,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
It is reported as failed see below and those parts are added twice -
filesystem 66 parts 68.
In earlier version it is reported correctly.
Perhaps this is a change in behavior, but I think that this version
