Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I saw a similar thing when the disk of my backup server died last month.
The machine ran Debian
Hi,
Tar stores by default both user/group name and numeric information when
creating an archive.
When creating archives, if --numeric-owner is used, the user/group name
information isn't stored.
When restoring, if --numeric-owner is set, tar will only use the numeric
information from the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Kosa Attila wrote:
Environment:
- server
- Debian Sarge, amanda-server 2.4.4p3-3;
- client
- Debian Sarge, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3;
- Debian Woody, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3 (I made it myself
backport).
The clients' full backup is succesful
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I saw a similar thing when the disk of my backup server died last month.
The machine ran Debian testing, and I used an Ubuntu Live CD (the Knoppix I
had
lying around didn't support SATA) to do the restore.
After the
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I saw a similar thing when the disk of my backup server died last month.
The machine ran Debian testing, and I used an Ubuntu Live CD (the Knoppix I
had
lying around didn't support
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I saw a similar thing when the disk of my backup server died last month.
The machine ran Debian testing, and I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:33:10AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
My understanding, subject to correction, is that by default guntar
restores by trying to match text names (user and group) between the
archive and the recovery system. If a match is found, then the
restore is to the numeric
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
So you could easily get a real hodge-podge of names and numeric ids
by recovering to a different system.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:48:26PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Kosa Attila wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:42:30PM +0100, Kosa Attila wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:48:26PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Kosa Attila wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:00:45PM +0100, Kosa Attila wrote:
Hi all,
Environment:
- server
- Debian Sarge, amanda-server 2.4.4p3-3;
- client
- Debian Sarge, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3;
- Debian Woody, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3 (I made it myself
backport).
The
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:00:45PM +0100, Kosa Attila wrote:
Hi all,
Environment:
- server
- Debian Sarge, amanda-server 2.4.4p3-3;
- client
- Debian Sarge, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3;
- Debian Woody, amanda-client 2.4.4p3-3 (I made it myself
12 matches
Mail list logo