On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:43:40PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> I tried some throughput checks today. Test one was a "cp -r"
> of a directory tree with 8.5GB (only a few large files) and
> test two was a ufsdump of a 1GB partition. Both gave between
> 3 and 3.5MB/sec rates to the NFS device. That
Hi Jon,
I may have missed an earlier post, but what kind of network is
between the two devices (server you are wanting to back up &
Snap storage) ?
If you have 10Mbps ethernet hub, then 3.5MB/sec is an extremely
good figure. If you have 100Mbps switches between the two
devices, then 3.5MB/sec is
Of Jon LaBadie
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: recommendation needed
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:30:42PM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
> > --On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 23:53:13 -0400 Jon LaBadie
> > <[EMAIL PR
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:30:42PM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 23:53:13 -0400 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
> > what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
> > to be backed up
> I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
> what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
> to be backed up to a PC network.
>
> The Solaris system has no tape unit. The PC side has a
> good amount of network shared storage and is backed up
> to tape regularly. So
--On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 23:53:13 -0400 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
> what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
> to be backed up to a PC network.
By 'PC', are you implying MS Windows, or are there PC L
I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
to be backed up to a PC network.
The Solaris system has no tape unit. The PC side has a
good amount of network shared storage and is backed up
to tape regularly. So it seems to me
