I am running Amanda versions 2.4.2p2 on a AIX 5.1 system.
I have been getting these strange dump details, and would
like
To resolve these problems. The following information
is provided.
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
/--
thunder /home lev 1 STRANGE
sendbackup: start
[thund
Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean FAILURE
AND STRANGE DUMP
(magnus is a nt client, technix the tape server).
Thanx, Michael
These dumps were to tape ordix05.
Tonight's dumps should go onto 1 tape: a new tape.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
technix.kn /var le
Hi there,
I using amanda to backup several servers, but now some of my disks
started signaling the following error. Those are vx filesystems of
an HP 10.20, I have done fbackup on those filesystems and I worked.
I also tried to switch from compressed to noncompressed but with no
luck. Has
Kevin D. Alford wrote:
I am running Amanda versions 2.4.2p2 on a AIX 5.1 system.
I have been getting these strange dump details, and would like
To resolve these problems. The following information is provided.
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
/-- thunder/home lev 1 STRANGE
...
? gtar: Removing
Title: RE: Strange Dumps?
I have upgraded gnutar version to 1.14 and everything works fine.
Thanx.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Valentine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 7/23/2004 6:03 PM
To: Paul Bijnens
Cc: Kevin D. Alford; Amanda Users
Subject: Re: Strange Dumps
>Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean FAILURE
>AND STRANGE DUMP ...
Amanda watches the stderr lines from the backup program and pattern
matches them against things it expects (normal). Every other line is
considered "strange". If the backup failed or there were any st
> "John" == John R Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can you tell me something about this report ? What does it mean
>> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP ...
John> Amanda watches the stderr lines from the backup program and
John> pattern matches them against things it expects (n
On Nov 4, 2000, Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still using 2.4.1 (does anyone know if there are 2.4.2 rpms
> available yet ?).
You *might* be able to find them at rawhide.redhat.com
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Develo
On 4 Nov 2000, Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
> available yet ?). Anyway, I was wondering if there is a way for me to
> adjust the pattern which determines which messages are "normal". For
> instance, I would like to define "socket ignored" as normal, and
> other such messages.
Have a look at messages a
>I using amanda to backup several servers, but now some of my disks
>started signaling the following error. Those are vx filesystems of
>an HP 10.20 ...
>| vxdump: SIGSEGV: ABORTING!
This is either an HP or Veritas (is that who does VX?) problem.
You'll probably need to talk to your vendor a
Well, good news and bad news...
The good news is that, after an apt-get upgrade on the tapehost[1]
last week, the dumps from my samba DLEs seem to be reliable and complete.
The bad news is that amanda still reports them as "strange", with the
strange dump summary consisting of several variations
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:10:53AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> Where do I go to tell amanda that these "SUCCESS..." messages should be
> considered normal?
It's a hard-coded list.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
It must be said that they wo
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:10:53AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > Where do I go to tell amanda that these "SUCCESS..." messages should be
> > considered normal?
>
> It's a hard-coded list.
Then how about a (reasonably) simple way
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:10:53AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > Where do I go to tell amanda that these "SUCCESS..." messages should be
> > considered normal?
>
> It's a hard-coded list.
>
But easily extended.
See the source
Hey folks,
I'm having an odd problem with one of my backup clients.
Every single night (I back up nightly), one particular partition
ends up with a "STRANGE" report, saying that a file (pick a file,
any file) has changed while it was being read.
The stats:
Client: OpenBSD 3.2-ST
On Saturday 04 January 2003 14:15, C. Bensend wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
> I'm having an odd problem with one of my backup clients.
>Every single night (I back up nightly), one particular partition
>ends up with a "STRANGE" report, saying that a file (pick a file,
>any file) has changed while it wa
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a file
> are not supported by samba because they are not supported by the
> underlying (usually vfat) file system. So apparently, some dummy
> value g
On Sunday 05 January 2003 00:24, C. Bensend wrote:
>Comments inline.
>
>On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a
>> file are not supported by samba because they are not supported
>> by the underlying (usually vfat)
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:22:49AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I get around that problem here with the use of an extra directory on
> one of the drives here that has an rsync'd image of the stuff on
> the other machine I use mainly for a firewall that I would normally
> use samba for the bac
19 matches
Mail list logo
