Hi, Tom,
on Donnerstag, 17. März 2005 at 17:27 you wrote to amanda-users:
TS> In case you forgot, it does not appear to be fixed here yet:
TS> http://www.amanda.org/docs/amanda.8.html
Thanks.
Had fixed it in the source, but forgot to publish.
It's html-only so far, the pdf doesn't get updated
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 23:52 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi, Tom,
>
> on Dienstag, 15. März 2005 at 23:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> TS> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:25 -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 01:03 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >> > While amanda is always
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:27:51AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Will Amanda use any tape that is more than tapecycle entries down
> the list or only the one of the bottom ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Hi, Tom,
> >
> > on Dienstag, 15. März 200
Will Amanda use any tape that is more than tapecycle entries down
the list or only the one of the bottom ?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi, Tom,
>
> on Dienstag, 15. März 2005 at 23:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> TS> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:25 -070
Hi, Tom,
on Dienstag, 15. März 2005 at 23:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
TS> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:25 -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 01:03 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> > While amanda is always willing to use a new tape in its rotation,
>> > it refuses to reuse a tap
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:25 -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 01:03 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > While amanda is always willing to use a new tape in its rotation,
> > it refuses to reuse a tape until at least 'tapecycle' number of
> > other tapes have been used.
Ooops
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 01:03 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
> > Here is my bad attempt at an improvement, please do not use it verbatim:
>
> Here is my attempt at a revision:
>
> tapecycle int
> Default: 15 tapes. Typically tap
We have found that a shorter dumpcycle simplifies restores.
We have also found that a shorter tape cycle simplified managerial
issues... We need to investigate XYZ user please bring back all copies
of their Lotus Notes mailbox.
We find 20-25 tapes ample for most situations, gives a month plus
re
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Tom Schutter wrote:
> I had some questions regarding tapecycle, and after reading the man
> page and the doc (old and new), I think that they fall short on
> describing what tapecycle should be set to. The minimum value of
> tapecycle is well covered, but
I had some questions regarding tapecycle, and after reading the man
page and the doc (old and new), I think that they fall short on
describing what tapecycle should be set to. The minimum value of
tapecycle is well covered, but not the maximum value, and how
tapecycle should relate to the number o
10 matches
Mail list logo
