true.
wab
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Bijnens
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Brian Cuttler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Knight
Subject: Re: why too large ?
Brian Cuttler wrote:
> So here is an interesting problem.
Brian Cuttler wrote:
So here is an interesting problem.
Up until a couple weeks ago we had no problems at all running
amdump on this system. Recently however its reporting that
/maildb2 is too large for the tape.
The confusing part to me though is that that is not the largest
partition, the larg
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 at 12:03pm, Brian Cuttler wrote
> Up until a couple weeks ago we had no problems at all running
> amdump on this system. Recently however its reporting that
> /maildb2 is too large for the tape.
Not exactly...
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> wcnotes/maildb2 lev 1
Hi, Brian Cuttler,
on 19. November 2003 at 18:03 you wrote to amanda-users:
BC> So here is an interesting problem.
BC> Up until a couple weeks ago we had no problems at all running
BC> amdump on this system. Recently however its reporting that
BC> /maildb2 is too large for the tape.
BC> The con
So here is an interesting problem.
Up until a couple weeks ago we had no problems at all running
amdump on this system. Recently however its reporting that
/maildb2 is too large for the tape.
The confusing part to me though is that that is not the largest
partition, the largest /maildb, which h
