Hello,
current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could be
related to kdelibs 4.6.5):
make -f doc/nl/CMakeFiles/nl-handbook.dir/build.make doc/nl/CMakeFiles/nl-
handbook.dir/build
make[3]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_p
I'm testing the tarball myself ATM. What CMake options did you use to build?
i18n people: I have no clue about the translation stuff.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 19:50, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could be
> related to kdel
Hello,
On šeštadienis 17 Gruodis 2011 21:12:02 Bart Cerneels wrote:
> I'm testing the tarball myself ATM. What CMake options did you use to
> build?
Nothing fancy:
-DCMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS=ON
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debian
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON
--
Modestas Vaini
On 17. 12. 2011 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could be
> related to kdelibs 4.6.5):
>
> cd ../doc/nl && /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64- linux-gnu/doc/nl/index.cache.bz2
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/doc/nl/index.doc
El Dissabte, 17 de desembre de 2011, a les 20:12:02, Bart Cerneels va
escriure:
> I'm testing the tarball myself ATM. What CMake options did you use to build?
>
> i18n people: I have no clue about the translation stuff.
Thom.Castermans entity was added to kdelibs on Wed Oct 12 this means nl
doc
Hello,
On šeštadienis 17 Gruodis 2011 23:33:18 Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 17. 12. 2011 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could
> > be related to kdelibs 4.6.5):
> >
> > cd ../doc/nl && /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache
> > /«PKGBUILDDIR»
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 15:12, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On šeštadienis 17 Gruodis 2011 23:33:18 Matěj Laitl wrote:
>> On 17. 12. 2011 Modestas Vainius wrote:
>> > current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could
>> > be related to kdelibs 4.6.5):
>> >
>> > cd .
This problem sneaked in through auto-generated translations at release
time. Most developers are running very recent kdelibs versions (latest
stable or even git) and we don't have an automated build testing
system to catch these. We do rely on packagers to notify us of
problems in their specific bu
Hello,
On antradienis 27 Gruodis 2011 23:42:53 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > So a broken amarok 2.5.0 tarball was released to the public.
> > Unfortunately, this has been happening a lot with amarok recently... Oh
> > well, in case somebody is interested, the patch is attached.
>
> We did not r
On 27. 12. 2011 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> We did not release a broken tarball at all. Just because your
> definitions are not up-to-date doesn't mean it is Amarok's fault.
This is not entirely true, Myriam. The definitions are part of kdelibs and we
claim to support kdelibs 4.6, so we in fact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heya,
has that patch already been committed to master? It should
be part of 2.5.1.
- --
Darkerradio Free Music Charts November 2011:
http://www.darkerradio.com/news/free-music-charts-november-2011/
Klarmachen zum Ändern! -> http://www.piratenpartei.d
On 3. 1. 2012 Sven Krohlas wrote:
> Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details
> Heya,
>
> has that patch already been committed to master? It should
> be part of 2.5.1.
Sven,
doc/nl/index.docbook is not a part of amarok master, it is added to amarok
releases by release s
Hello,
On antradienis 03 Sausis 2012 17:58:10 Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 3. 1. 2012 Sven Krohlas wrote:
> > Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details
> > Heya,
> >
> > has that patch already been committed to master? It should
> > be part of 2.5.1.
>
> Sven,
> doc/nl/index.do
13 matches
Mail list logo
