Re: [AMaViS-user] FINAL DECISION: Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Matt Juszczak
Hi all, OK, I think I've made a final decision on what I'd like to do. I think I'm going to setup two of the 1U boxes we have (the 3.06 ghz machines with IDE drives). I'm going to call one "relay1" and one "relay2". I'm going to setup MX records for the 500+ domains we have. Half of them wil

Re: [AMaViS-user] Can't start Amavis after update

2005-07-21 Thread Gary V
Cariad wrote: > > If you need to get your server running, you can set: > > $enable_db = 0; > > This will buy you some time until the cause of the problem can be > > properly determined. > > > > Gary V > Thank you Gary. > However, it seems like I already have solved the problem. > The proble

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Clifton Royston
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:11:37PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:27:01PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We're running postfix right now on our mail server. Mail server always > > has 97% CPU idle and we have 4 gb of RAM, to which most is usually free

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:27:01PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, > > We're running postfix right now on our mail server. Mail server always > has 97% CPU idle and we have 4 gb of RAM, to which most is usually free. > > We deliver mail for about 5000 accounts, but our spam filtering is

Re: [AMaViS-user] Can't start Amavis after update

2005-07-21 Thread Cariad
> If you need to get your server running, you can set: > $enable_db = 0; > This will buy you some time until the cause of the problem can be > properly determined. > > Gary V Thank you Gary. However, it seems like I already have solved the problem. The problem lied in an updated db4 RPM package.

Re: [AMaViS-user] Can't start Amavis after update

2005-07-21 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, I'm currently running Whitebox Linux, kernel 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp. I have seen some bdb errors on Whitebox after upgrading the db4 RPMs. The problem seemed to be that the updates have been compiled with different options. Downgrading the db4 RPMs solved the problem (in this case with cyr

Re: [AMaViS-user] Can't start Amavis after update

2005-07-21 Thread Gary V
Cariad wrote: > Hi, > I updated some rpms and my kernel, and now Amavis won't start. > I was running 2.2.0, but since it stopped working, I tried to upgrade to > 2.3.2, but got exactly the same error (only different line): > Jul 21 23:08:32 /usr/sbin/amavisd[13301]: No secondary av > scanner:

[AMaViS-user] Can't start Amavis after update

2005-07-21 Thread Cariad
Hi, I updated some rpms and my kernel, and now Amavis won't start. I was running 2.2.0, but since it stopped working, I tried to upgrade to 2.3.2, but got exactly the same error (only different line): Jul 21 23:08:32 /usr/sbin/amavisd[13301]: No secondary av scanner: KasperskyLab kavscanner J

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Gary V
Gary wrote: > If you already own the hardware, here is a (possibly lame) thought > (but the theory sounds good to me). Set up > amavisd/spamassassin/razor/dcc/avprogram on both machines. Now that I think about it, I think you could set Postfix up to send a portion to one server, and the remainder

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Gary V
Matt wrote: > All of your suggestions have been great. Thank you. > My only concern is this > If I were to setup another server, that server would be a single 3.06 > ghz machine with 1 GB RAM and IDE drives. The current server is dual > 3.06 ghz 4 GB RAM with SCSI drives and RAID. > So my

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Gary V
>> Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of >> those, 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined. >> >> So my question below should wrap around that data. Will it be able >> to process 123,728 messages per day, with antivirus/antispam and >> local mail delivery? >> >> I ha

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread Matt Juszczak
All of your suggestions have been great. Thank you. My only concern is this If I were to setup another server, that server would be a single 3.06 ghz machine with 1 GB RAM and IDE drives. The current server is dual 3.06 ghz 4 GB RAM with SCSI drives and RAID. So my choice is either to ke

Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?

2005-07-21 Thread lst_hoe01
Zitat von Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Just an update to everyone. I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider. Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of those, 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined. So my question below should wrap around that dat