Hello All,
I have SASL_MYNET_BYPASS policy bank implemented, so my local network users
and SASL authenticated users would bypass spam and banned files checks and
only virus checks would apply to them.
I've also list several mailing lists in amavisd.conf like this:
@spam_lovers_maps
=
Mark Martinec wrote:
Jef,
SA debugging can be turned on selectively, e.g:
# amavisd -d bayes,learn debug-sa
I have the default settings from ubuntu for spamassassin.
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 12.0
bayes_auto_learn 1
Jef,
On a total of 232 messages, 25 get learned (4 ham, 21 spam) and 129 are
not learned. I have no idea what happened to the other 78 messages.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
Mark
-
Take
On 11/29/06, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it continues to happen, either run amavisd-new in debug mode until
it crashes (if it does), then show the last half dozen or so entries
or *temporarily* set $log_level to 5 and look for error messages from
amavisd-new in your log. It's not
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
I should add: 'autolearn=...' is not shown when SA is not called,
which can be because results from previous instance of the same message
was cached, or other reasons for not calling SA (white/blacklisted,
bypass_spam_checks, message
On 12/14/06, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try a newer version of 'file' and make sure its first in the path?
Sorry, but, what 'file' ? amavisd-new ?
It started to work bad from time to time, no changes were made...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andres
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:49 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Urgent Help Mails Deferred by Postfix
On 12/14/06, Michael Scheidell
Andres,
On 12/14/06, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try a newer version of 'file' and make sure its first in the path?
Sorry, but, what 'file' ? amavisd-new ?
It started to work bad from time to time, no changes were made...
man 1 file
Btw, below is a patch to amavisd which
On 12/14/06, Leon Kolchinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but, what 'file' ? amavisd-new ?
It started to work bad from time to time, no changes were made...
file is just a utility.
# man file
FILE(1) FILE(1)
NAME
file -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andres
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:17 AM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Urgent Help Mails Deferred by Postfix
(31027-04) TROUBLE in check_mail:
On 12/14/06, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, below is a patch to amavisd which will let the error message
parsing file(1) results - missing last x results
be more informative by also reporting exit status from the
file(1) utility. This may help troubleshoot your problem.
---
Andres,
Thanks Mark for your answer, my amavisd file has 14938 lines,
it does not reach 16290...
(amavisd-new from ubuntu packages)
The patch is against 2.4.4.
It is likely that it will apply to earlier versions,
with some line offset, likely to be automatically determined
by patch. Try and
On 12/14/06, Andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Mark for your answer, my amavisd file has 14938 lines, it does
not reach 16290...
(amavisd-new from ubuntu packages)
I do have this line
defined $ln || $!==0 || $!==EAGAIN
But at other location... Can I apply your patch manually ?
Thanks
Andres,
As you see I do not have proc_status_ok line and some sentences are
different. Can you tell me the modifications for my amavisd-new file
version?
Which version is that? 2.3.3? That's more than a year old.
Are you sure you want to bother with it?
Make sure you have Net::Server version
On 12/14/06, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which version is that? 2.3.3? That's more than a year old.
Are you sure you want to bother with it?
Make sure you have Net::Server version compatible with
your version of amavisd-new. The latest Net::Server still
compatible with
Andres wrote:
On 12/13/06, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do have whitespace where the directive continues on to the next
line, maybe you need to show 'postconf -n'. Are you sure the client in
question was authenticated?
Gary V
Gary, I do have pcre support, I installed
Andres,
I appreciate your patience on this.
That's a year old from source but from packages is the last ( I do not
know why ubuntu package maintainera are not using a more updated
version).
My choice of OS is FreeBSD :-)
In this very conversation thread I patched amavisd-new file to be
Leon,
1) What's the meaning of these lines do_notify_and_quarantine:
rec_ccat=(1,0), ccat=(1,1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
It comes from:
do_log(2,do_notify_and_quarantine: rec_ccat=(%d,%d), ccat=(%d,%s), %s,
$rec_ccat, $rec_ccat_min, $ccat, $ccat_min, $rec)
if $rec_ccat !=
On 12/14/06, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My choice of OS is FreeBSD :-)
Hey That's my choice too :) ! I have a 4.10 server with jboss running
since 2 years with no problem, I do not know why I tried ubuntu, maybe
I can switch in the future...
I found perl-net 0.94 and I will try
Andres,
I found perl-net 0.94 and I will try to install it if you guys tell me
that this version is compatible with my amavis version.
With amavisd-new-2.3.3 or earlier you need Net::Server 0.90 or earlier.
With 2.4.0 or later you can use any version of Net::Server
(but preferably avoid 0.91,
Hi,
Is it possible to hide the following headers in a mail scanned by
amavisd-new ?
X-Virus-Scanned:amavisd-new at abc.com
Thank you.
-Admin
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
At 12:07 PM 12/14/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to hide the following headers in a mail scanned by
amavisd-new ?
X-Virus-Scanned:amavisd-new at abc.com
Thank you.
in amavisd.conf
$X_HEADER_TAG = undef;
--
Noel Jones
Is it possible to hide the following headers in a mail scanned by
amavisd-new ?
X-Virus-Scanned:amavisd-new at abc.com
You mean how not to insert it?
$X_HEADER_TAG = '';
or:
$X_HEADER_LINE = '';
(no need to disable both)
Mark
On 12/14/06, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the patch that should apply cleanly to 2.3.3:
Mark
Mark, this is the output of the error with the patch applied:
Dec 14 14:12:27 pc009 postfix/smtp[5276]: 5E08039A34D:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=22,
Hi,
does anybody has german templates for my read_l10n_templates
to put into: /etc/amavis/de_DE/
And / or is it possible to select automatically the correct template
depends on the LANG oder LC_* types?
To have both: en_US and de_DE files
Using Amavis Version: 2.4.4
Regards
Christian
Andres,
Mark, this is the output of the error with the patch applied:
Dec 14 14:12:27 pc009 postfix/smtp[5276]: 5E08039A34D:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=22,
status=deferred (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in
processing, id=05248-01,
Hi,
I am facing a very unusual problem. Mails received from a particular
domain on the e-mail gateway for processing are tagged as SPAM because
of high scores . I checked and found that most of the mails ( about
90%) of it is always genuine mail.This is a problem for e-mails
received
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
...
Why there is two hour gap (14:32 and 16:32) in between amavis and
postfix/smtp transport (cause I can see that postfix/pipe is showing right
time in the logs)?
Looks like a discrepancy in time zone.
Perhaps your
Mark Martinec wrote:
Florin Andrei,
After running sa-update, the new rules were installed under
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org
I restarted amavisd but I cannot tell whether it's the new rules that
are being used, or the old ones.
Is there a way to tell which rule
29 matches
Mail list logo
