* sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, I have a problema with amavisd-new (my version is
amavisd-new-2.3.1-1.1), in log file I have:
..
(delivery temporarily suspended: connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: Connection
refused)
I have tried:
#rm /var/amavis/amavisd.pid
..but the problem isn't
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Have you restarted amavisd-new?
..yes.
--
Salvatore.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions
* sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Have you restarted amavisd-new?
..yes.
And is it running now?
please show your postconf -n output.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450
Pavel wrote:
Hello,
when I've tried to raise the limit of amavisd-new processes to some
insane value (128 I think) I've encountered this problem:
Jan 1 19:37:55 antivir5 amavis[1170]: (!!)TROUBLE in child_init_hook:
BDB no dbS: Lock table is out of available locker entries, . at (eval
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Gary V wrote:
I installed maRBL 1.1 on a Debian system and it appears to be
working. Oddly however the log output looks like:
marbl: p0f query: %s port=%s %s %s
marbl: p0f collect: max_wait=%.3f, %.35s... = %s
marbl: Action for %s (%s = %s): %s
As opposed to a Fedora
Gary wrote:
I installed maRBL 1.1 on a Debian system and it appears to be
working. Oddly however the log output looks like:
marbl: p0f query: %s port=%s %s %s
marbl: p0f collect: max_wait=%.3f, %.35s... = %s
marbl: Action for %s (%s = %s): %s
As opposed to a Fedora system:
marbl: p0f
On 1/1/07, Patrick Ben Koetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run a sloppy modified version from a p0f-init-skript that Dag Wieers
created. You can download it here:
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/p0f
Feel free to improve it. ;)
Thanks!
--
-ste
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:34 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Is there any way to track how long each portion of the scan takes for a
message? It would be handy to know for each message how long the virus
scan took, how long the rbl checks take, how long FuzzyOCR takes... etc.
Log level 2 (in
Bob wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:34 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Is there any way to track how long each portion of the scan takes for a
message? It would be handy to know for each message how long the virus
scan took, how long the rbl checks take, how long FuzzyOCR takes... etc.
Log level
At 03:10 PM 1/2/2007, Bob Pierce wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:34 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Is there any way to track how long each portion of the scan takes for a
message? It would be handy to know for each message how long the virus
scan took, how long the rbl checks take, how long
Brian wrote:
On 1/2/07, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed maRBL 1.1 on a Debian system and it appears to be
working. Oddly however the log output looks like:
marbl: p0f query: %s port=%s %s %s
marbl: p0f collect: max_wait=%.3f, %.35s... = %s
marbl: Action for %s (%s = %s): %s
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:24 -0700, Gary V wrote:
Which makes me wonder, is there a performance benefit to running clamd
instead of having spamassassin call clamscan?
There is a hugh difference. Get clamd running. Actually, it's amavisd-new
that calls virus scanners, not spamassassin.
Vincent wrote:
Try to change line 87 and line 89 to:
87 $hostport =~ /^(?: inet: )? ([^:]*) : ([^:]*) /six
88 or die Bad p0f method syntax: $hostport;
89 my($host,$port) = ($1, $2); my($sock);
and see if it make any difference.
If it is not maRBL problem, then
snip
Thanks Michael and Brian. Do you get these also when it tries to
perform RBL checks?
fatal: alarm time out at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Net/RBLClient.pm line 85.
I think that is just Net::RBLClient complaining that a particular RBL
didnt respond in time and is skipping it. Im not
Hey all, new to the list here.
Our setup here at work is an amavis setup to filter mail for many
domains and emails (typical isp-like environment). What happens
ocassionally is that incoming mail will spike and then the mail queue
starts to grow. Amavis processing becomes more sporatic, it
Alan wrote:
Hey all, new to the list here.
Our setup here at work is an amavis setup to filter mail for many
domains and emails (typical isp-like environment). What happens
ocassionally is that incoming mail will spike and then the mail queue
starts to grow. Amavis processing becomes
Is the following message coming from amavisd-new? This happens often when
they are sending an email to someone within the same domain. How do I turn
off spam scanning on outgoing mail in Amavisd-new so that only incoming
email is scanned for spam? Or how else would I solve this problem?
I have
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:03:18PM -0700, Gary V wrote:
I am going to let it go for a while by itself but will probably add (a
somewhat permissive) policyd-weight back into the mix (ahead of selective
greylisting).
It would be very simple to add greylist command support to policyd-weight.
18 matches
Mail list logo
