Is there any way to monitor my ips in RBLs.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
On 6/15/07, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The README.sql-pg in amavisd-new distribution suggests
the following SQL clauses to purge old records from a database:
DELETE FROM msgs WHERE time_iso now() - INTERVAL '3 weeks';
The script that does this on my amavis-setup had a convenient
I think this message is just spam, and not something nefarious, but
amavisd flagged it as BANNED due to an exe. Can anyone tell if this
really was malware?
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Quarantine-ID: lGMnl3xEtzBg
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains part: text/plain,.exe
X-Spam-Flag:
Hi,
I am currently using amavisd-new-2.3.1. While upgrading to version 2.4.3
, I started getting memory problem. I have not changed my old amavisd
conf file which I am using with amavisd-new-2.3.1 .
I have also tried to increase the log level of amavis to 5 but not found
any error in maillog.
Hi Azfar Hashmi,
Here is a simple perl script to do this :)
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Net::RBLClient;
die Usage: $0 file or ip.add.re.ss ...\n unless scalar(@ARGV);
my @target = ();
foreach my $ip_list (@ARGV) {
if ($ip_list =~ /$Net::RBLClient::ip_pat/o and not -f $ip_list) {
At 11:19 AM 6/26/2007, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
I think this message is just spam, and not something nefarious, but
amavisd flagged it as BANNED due to an exe. Can anyone tell if this
really was malware?
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Quarantine-ID: lGMnl3xEtzBg
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED,
Prashant Dabre,
I am currently using amavisd-new-2.3.1. While upgrading to version 2.4.3
Why would one want to 'upgrade' to a nine months old version?
I have not changed my old amavisd conf file which I am using
with amavisd-new-2.3.1 .
Ok.
I started getting memory problem. I have also
Daniel,
I think this message is just spam, and not something nefarious, but
amavisd flagged it as BANNED due to an exe. Can anyone tell if this
really was malware?
The file command does evaluate the text as executable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ file foo2.txt
foo2.txt: COM executable for DOS
On Monday 25 June 2007 19:31, Mike Cappella wrote:
But I don't see any headers added to the messages. I used
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInPostfixWithAma
vis to help me with my setup. Can someone point me to
something I might be missing?
Have you verified that
Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi Azfar Hashmi,
Here is a simple perl script to do this :)
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
[snip]
a less sofisticated shell version:
#!/bin/sh
ip_list=`grep -v ^# /path/to/ips`
rbl_zones=`grep -v ^# /path/to/rbls`
check_ip()
{
ip=$1
zone=$2
rev_ip=`echo $ip | awk
Gary wrote:
The next question would be - are you sending mail to amavisd-new
at all? What MTA are you using?
Also, don't test by sending mail from the local machine using sendmail
or similar. Send from an external client via SMTP.
Gary V
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:29, Gary V wrote:
Joshua wrote:
Have you verified that spamassassin is actually being called for the
mail in question?
That's what I'm trying to do. In reply to another e-mail, I have these
lines in my config file:
$X_HEADER_TAG = 'X-Virus-Scanned';
HM,
The problem is the foreign key constraints on msgrcpt.
I found a solution:
...
Voila, takes less than 30 minutes, including typing/pasting, on 3.4
million rows in msgs/4.2 million rows in msgrcpt which should be a
small enough delay for most uses.
Thanks, useful for purging majority of
Joshua wrote:
Virus is un-commented, bypass_spam is commented (all occurrences I could
find). Here are the headers added to the mail once it hits the server
(mail.example.com, to protect the innocent :) ).
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.example.com
Gary wrote:
With $sa_tag_level_deflt = -999; and
@local_domains_maps = ( [ .example.com ] );
and spam checks are not bypassed, it should work. Is there another
server downstream removing X-Spam headers?
Are you using SQL or LDAP and the recipient's spam_tag_level is
observed instead of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
