Re: [AMaViS-user] penpals triggered on outbound, not inbound.

2007-09-07 Thread Nate
At 05:29 PM 9/7/2007, Mark Martinec wrote: > > Of additional note, when I add a little more debugging code to > > amavisd in the penpals sections, it seems regardless if a domain is > > local or not (or even in cases where @local_domain_maps is undefined > > i find the following: > > > > lookup(0,

Re: [AMaViS-user] penpals triggered on outbound, not inbound.

2007-09-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Nate, > Of additional note, when I add a little more debugging code to > amavisd in the penpals sections, it seems regardless if a domain is > local or not (or even in cases where @local_domain_maps is undefined > i find the following: > > lookup(0,$sender,@{ca('local_domains_maps')}) ALWAYS retu

Re: [AMaViS-user] penpals triggered on outbound, not inbound.

2007-09-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Nate, > In this setup, there are thousands of domains being scanned, and > amavis as well as postfix utilize a mysql db to determine where > to forward the email after it's scanned via a postfix transport > table. With this setup, I typically leave @mynetworks and > @local_domains_maps undefined

Re: [AMaViS-user] penpals triggered on outbound, not inbound.

2007-09-07 Thread Nate
Of additional note, when I add a little more debugging code to amavisd in the penpals sections, it seems regardless if a domain is local or not (or even in cases where @local_domain_maps is undefined i find the following: lookup(0,$sender,@{ca('local_domains_maps')}) ALWAYS returns Y This is

[AMaViS-user] penpals triggered on outbound, not inbound.

2007-09-07 Thread Nate
I know this must be something I've overlooked as it just seem so silly that penpals would work in reverse order. All outbound email from my location sends through a SMTP server which forwards to the AMAVIS filtering server before leaving the network. Inbound email comes into the AMAVIS server,

Re: [AMaViS-user] skip amavis for relay_domains

2007-09-07 Thread Gary V
On 9/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just setup a Postfix + Amavis server a while back (after finally > getting away from a Qmail installation I really didn't like). > > I'm using virtual domains, and a few other fancy features (like database > storage of those v

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Clifton Royston
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:07:30PM -0600, Miguel wrote: > I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that? > regards Either or both, depending. You may see a significant reduction in the load on your mailserver if you check high-reliability BLs like the CBL or the Spamh

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread mouss
Miguel wrote: > I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that? > regards do both: - use few "safe" DNSBLs (zen.spamhaus.org for example) in the MTA to reject transaction without having to process data or queue the message - use whatever DNSBLs you want in SA. - you can

[AMaViS-user] skip amavis for relay_domains

2007-09-07 Thread list-amavis-user
Hi guys, I just setup a Postfix + Amavis server a while back (after finally getting away from a Qmail installation I really didn't like). I'm using virtual domains, and a few other fancy features (like database storage of those virtual domain mailboxes), and for the most part I like the instal

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Dave McGuire
On Sep 7, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do >> that? >> regards > If you don't have the option to merge the results of several rbls > together, > don't use them at smtp time. RBLs make errors, several freemailer, big > p

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Miguel
Alexander Wirt escribió: > Miguel schrieb am Freitag, den 07. September 2007: > > >> I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that? >> regards >> > If you don't have the option to merge the results of several rbls together, > don't use them at smtp time. RBLs make e

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Alexander Wirt
Miguel schrieb am Freitag, den 07. September 2007: > I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that? > regards If you don't have the option to merge the results of several rbls together, don't use them at smtp time. RBLs make errors, several freemailer, big providers and ot

Re: [AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Svensson
Unless you want to block emails solely based on the RBL response, do it in SA. Then the response will add to the total score, which is the preferred way (AFAIK). //Martin On Friday 07 September 2007 21:07:30 Miguel wrote: > I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that

[AMaViS-user] rbl in SA or in MTA, which is better

2007-09-07 Thread Miguel
I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that? regards - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration

Re: [AMaViS-user] error uvupdate

2007-09-07 Thread MrC
Markus Edholm wrote: > Hi All, > > I´m having some errors for uvupdate > sometimes my hourly update works nice but occasionally i got this: > > Virus Scan for Linux v4.16.0 > Copyright (c) 1992-2004 Networks Associates Technology Inc. All rights > reserved. > (408) 988-3832 LICENSED COPY - Nov 1

Re: [AMaViS-user] ANNOUNCE: amavisd-milter-1.3.0

2007-09-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Adam, > I am still a little fuzzy on the policy banks implementation details > myself. Does anyone know if a client is from MYNETS and does SMTP_AUTH > which one would amavisd use or would both apply if you have settings for > both banks? If they both apply then what order would they be processe

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd-new in a separate machine

2007-09-07 Thread Noel Jones
At 11:47 PM 9/6/2007, Justin Kim wrote: >Okay it gets more and more tricky. >I guess that is because I am just starting to learn some of these from >scratch. >I would like to have my amavis1 server to serve as main spam filter. >And for some reason if amavis1 is down, how can I configure postfix >s

Re: [AMaViS-user] ANNOUNCE: amavisd-milter-1.3.0

2007-09-07 Thread Adam Gibson
Mark Martinec wrote: > Peter, > >> I have added this to my amavisd.conf file >> >> $policy_bank{'SMTP_AUTH'} = { >> originating => 1, >> bypass_banned_checks_maps => [1], >> bypass_spam_checks_maps => [1], >> os_fingerprint_method => undef, # don't query p0f for internal clients >> }; >>

[AMaViS-user] Amavisd configuration

2007-09-07 Thread зБКЮЕОС йМШС
Hello, I am newbie in email server. I installed Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav through fedora yum command. Now I want configurate amavisd-new, but I didn't find good documentation about amavisd configuration file (/etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf). Where i can find good cocumentation

Re: [AMaViS-user] some spamassassin checks not occurring

2007-09-07 Thread matthew_buckland
Hello again, On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:13:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > > Matt, > > > > > I think I have done it correctly this time. > > > > Ok, this looks better now. > > > > [snip lots of good stuff] > > Thankyou so

[AMaViS-user] error uvupdate

2007-09-07 Thread Markus Edholm
Hi All, I´m having some errors for uvupdate sometimes my hourly update works nice but occasionally i got this: Virus Scan for Linux v4.16.0 Copyright (c) 1992-2004 Networks Associates Technology Inc. All rights reserved. (408) 988-3832 LICENSED COPY - Nov 13 2001 Scan engine v5.2.00 for Linux.