Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filetypes_lovers_maps?

2008-05-18 Thread Peer Heinlein
Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2008 schrieb Gary V: Additionally, there actually is @banned_files_lovers_maps Oh yes, shame on me. Sorry. I've been a bit (...very...) confused. Sure there IS a banned_files_lovers_maps. Sorry. I fact I need something different. I need a map for a banned_files SENDER

Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filetypes_lovers_maps?

2008-05-18 Thread Peer Heinlein
Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2008 schrieb Gary V: As Sahil mentioned, remembering that sender addresses can be forged Sure. and assuming you are using Postfix, read items 6 and 7 in this document: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html That does not work with smtpd_proxy_filter in

Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filetypes_lovers_maps?

2008-05-18 Thread Sahil Tandon
* Peer Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-18-2008]: None of those FILTER-Actions is possible amavisd-new is connect through smtpd_proxy_filter (and that's the only way to filter e-mails without having backscatter-problems). And it's not possible to use different IPs or tcp-ports using

Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filetypes_lovers_maps?

2008-05-18 Thread Peer Heinlein
Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2008 schrieb Sahil Tandon: None of those FILTER-Actions is possible amavisd-new is connect through smtpd_proxy_filter (and that's the only way to filter e-mails without having backscatter-problems). And it's not possible to use different IPs or tcp-ports using

Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filetypes_lovers_maps?

2008-05-18 Thread Sahil Tandon
* Peer Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-18-2008]: [yawn] Of course there are pros and cons. Nuances. YMMV. Et cetera. Had I known you were using amavisd-new as a proxy, I would not have suggested policy banks. :-) Okay, my question wasn't detailed enough (that's what I always blame