Re: [AMaViS-user] bouncekiller documentation vs config files different.

2009-01-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael, > I guess I am still trying to figure out why small (under the size limit), > not whitelisted, not exempt, not spam lovers, but is backscatter email is > getting in with a 'Hits: -,' which means amavisd didn't even look at it. > > The only thing I can say for every email that got back in

[AMaViS-user] amavisd-custom and access to list of tests

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
trying (using examples), amavisd-custom. looking to try to look at a SA check (looks like 'custom-checks' module) to be able to get the lists of TESTS in a variable. (like this tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=1, HELO_OEM=2.195, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RAZ

Re: [AMaViS-user] bouncekiller documentation vs config files different.

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
> Michael, > >> documentation says to activate bounce_killer, set score to non zero, and >> that default is 0, but config file shows 100: >> I guess I am still trying to figure out why small (under the size limit), not whitelisted, not exempt, not spam lovers, but is backscatter email is getting i

Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf

2009-01-20 Thread Eddy Beliveau
Hi! Gary, I does not find that new rule within http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf What is the url of the location of that updated rule ? Thanks and have a nice day Eddy Message original Sujet : Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf De : G

Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf

2009-01-20 Thread Eddy Beliveau
Hi! By refreshing my browser, I now notices that the rule has been updated. Sorry for the noise. Eddy Message original Sujet : Re: [AMaViS-user] about amavis-sanesecurity_v2.cf De : Eddy Beliveau Pour : Gary V Copie à : Amavis-Users Date : 2009-01-20 10:41 > Hi! Gary, > >