On 4/5/09, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> Hi, sorry for the OT, but I'd like to know other amavisd user experience
> about the
> autowhitelist.
>
> Currently it seems to become uneffective and unreliable, or even harmful.
> In fact many spammers now send you spam using your own (or your domain) name
> in
On 4/4/09, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> In amavisd-new documentation README.postfix (version 148,
> BTW, the release online is outdate, as reports version 122
> see http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix)
> there is reported that using amavisfeed_destination_concurrency_limit = XX
> is an al
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> Hi Mark, while I was trying to figure out and measure the performance
> of a amavisd+postfix+spamassassin system, to see whether the
> TimeElapsedSpamCheck was reliable, I was coming out with this patch
> (see attach) to know which plugin is effectively loaded by amavisd. In
Hi, sorry for the OT, but I'd like to know other amavisd user experience
about the
autowhitelist.
Currently it seems to become uneffective and unreliable, or even harmful.
In fact many spammers now send you spam using your own (or your domain) name
in "From "field, i.e. like if an email is sent by
Hi Mark, while I was trying to figure out and measure the performance
of a amavisd+postfix+spamassassin system, to see whether the
TimeElapsedSpamCheck was reliable, I was coming out with this patch
(see attach) to know which plugin is effectively loaded by amavisd. In
fact I haven't found such inf
Dmitri Snytkine a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I am just wondering what are the advantages of using Amavisd over just using
> Spamassassin in daemon mode (spamd)
> I mean spamd has support for dcc, razor, pyzor, dnsrbl, SPF, DKIM
> You can also configure your own regex rules to check headers
>
> What doe
