Re: [AMaViS-user] high wait I/O when amavisd-new turned on

2007-11-22 Thread Luc de Louw
Muenz, Michael wrote: > Hi list, > > I've replaced my old mailserver with a quadcore xeon, > 4gb RAM and LSILOGIC SAS Raid. With this step I switched bayes > from DB_File to MySQL. > Switchover was easygoing, and the CPU usage is 4 times > lower with the new machine, but I can see a huge increase

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis on lotus?

2007-10-24 Thread Luc de Louw
Quoting mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Javier wrote: [..] > you can. now you need to find a way so that postfix rejects invalid > recipients: > > - if the list of users is available in mysql/postgres/ldap, or if it can > be dumped (perdiocally?) to a flat file, then this is good. Lotus Notes comes

Re: [AMaViS-user] Strange encoding problem

2007-04-17 Thread Luc de Louw
Gary V wrote: > Luc wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> Since a few days I experience strange problems with wrong encoding of >> email bodies, headers are fine. > > Sounds as if libnet-1.20 is your problem. Please see: > http://tinyurl.com/2su6nf > > Gary V Dear Gary, That was the solution :-) Hopefu

[AMaViS-user] Strange encoding problem

2007-04-17 Thread Luc de Louw
ed on the system have been some system updates which had AFAIK nothing to do with encoding. The character you will/should see in the mails copy-pasted below is an german "ä" (ä) Thanks for any hints, Luc From: Luc de Louw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/2

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis and postfix policy

2007-01-24 Thread Luc de Louw
Dear Robert et al, Robert Brooks wrote: [..] > Mark, > > many thanks for this. I'd not thought about the problems with > performance. However it is precisely because this is prequeue that I am > interested. Me too, I'm interested to have some of the tests done pre-queue. > > I'm keen to avoi

[AMaViS-user] final_bad_header_destiny ignored?

2006-04-09 Thread Luc de Louw
Hi all, Since the update to 2.4.0 I it looks like final_bad_header_destiny is ignored. I have $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS; but badh mail will be quarantined. A quick look to those quarantined mails shows that almost all of these emails are regular mails which should be delivered.

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f not working

2006-04-09 Thread Luc de Louw
Michael Scheidell wrote: [..] Sounds interesting, any idea what kind of a load it puts on system/network to do the os fingerprinting? Until now I cannot see any significant additional load on the system. Okay its weekend any very little mails are processed. I'll keep you updated when somethi

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f not working

2006-04-09 Thread Luc de Louw
Dear Mark, Mark Martinec wrote: [..] that p0f-analyzer.pl is running, and that amavisd is receiving client IP address from MTA, which in the Postfix case means the XFORWARD must be enabled in the Postfix service feeding mail to amavisd, e.g. -o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes (or -o lmtp_send_xf

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f not working

2006-04-08 Thread Luc de Louw
Mark Martinec wrote: Luc, [..] The X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint header field is only seen by SA, it does not get into final forwarded message. To receive any scores based on it, add rules to SA 9local.cf), like the ones suggested in the release notes. Triggered SA rules would be seen in the log i

[AMaViS-user] p0f not working

2006-04-08 Thread Luc de Louw
Hi all, Did someone got the new p0f feature in 2.4.0 running? I added the line $os_fingerprint_method = 'p0f:127.0.0.1:2345'; to amavisd.conf checked the network settings in the p0f-analyzer and started p0f -l 'tcp dst port 25' 2>&1 | p0f-analyzer.pl 2345 amavisd debug-sa says OS_Fingerprint