* Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com [20100221 15:32]:
Le Jeudi 4 Février 2010 05:44:36, Thomas Arendsen Hein a écrit :
diff -urN amavisd-new-2.5.1.orig/amavisd amavisd-new-2.5.1/amavisd
--- amavisd-new-2.5.1.orig/amavisd 2007-05-31 14:10:01.0 +0200
+++
Thomas,
It removes the existing subject tag before it is added again at the
beginning of the subject to prevent subjects like
***UNCHECKED*** Fwd: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: foo bar
I personally think such a patch is wrong. At least should be optional.
Rewriting Subjects from mailclients is not
Hi!
https://issues.kolab.org/merge32 contains a patch (also attached to
this mail) that we use with amavisd-new 2.5.x since 2007, it still
applies to amavisd-new 2.6.4
It removes the existing subject tag before it is added again at the
beginning of the subject to prevent subjects like
Thomas Arendsen Hein schrieb am Donnerstag, den 04. Februar 2010:
Hi!
https://issues.kolab.org/merge32 contains a patch (also attached to
this mail) that we use with amavisd-new 2.5.x since 2007, it still
applies to amavisd-new 2.6.4
It removes the existing subject tag before it is added
* Thomas Arendsen Hein tho...@intevation.de [20100204 12:36]:
https://issues.kolab.org/merge32 contains a patch (also attached to
this mail) that we use with amavisd-new 2.5.x since 2007, it still
applies to amavisd-new 2.6.4
It seems the mailing list eats attachments, so again inline
(and of
* Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de [20100204 12:44]:
Thomas Arendsen Hein schrieb am Donnerstag, den 04. Februar 2010:
https://issues.kolab.org/merge32 contains a patch (also attached to
this mail) that we use with amavisd-new 2.5.x since 2007, it still
applies to amavisd-new 2.6.4
