Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-04-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, April 7, 2009 19:20, Mark Martinec wrote: >> However, if users HAVE asked for Virus checking, and Amavisd is unable >> to check the attachment, then it SHOULD modify the Subject to UNCHECKED. > Your suggestion makes sense, I'll make the change with 2.6.3, thanks! how does mailzu see this

Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-04-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Jorgen, > We are experiencing the issue that when users have > amavisBypassVirusCheck set to TRUE, mails containing password-protected > zips, or zips that trigger the expantionQuota, will modify the Subject > to "***UNCHECKED***". > > Since the user has asked for no virus checking, it should not

Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-03-29 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Don't know if it is correct, but I stuck this code in +8815: if ($hold ne '' || $any_undecipherable) { # Before Amavis would change the Subject for everyone # but we added code to check LDAP for each recip, and only change # Subject: if VIRUS scanning is wanted.

[AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-03-23 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Current version: 2.5.3, LDAP, Posfix on Solaris 10. We are experiencing the issue that when users have amavisBypassVirusCheck set to TRUE, mails containing password-protected zips, or zips that trigger the expantionQuota, will modify the Subject to "***UNCHECKED***". Since the user has asked for