Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-27 Thread amavis-user
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 1/27/06 5:56 AM: The command line version is solw and a memory hoog but it is free to use and have a good heuristic. If you want something fast use antivir or nod32 for mailserver (daemon mode). How does antivir compare to McAfee uvscan in terms of de

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-27 Thread lst_hoe01
Zitat von "Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard setup... postfix+amavisd-new+clamav+spamassassin I tipically use 2-3 scanners on each server but the

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Gary V
Vernon wrote: >>I concur, the console scanner is very slow, but it caught a few clamd >>missed and my load is light. I use clamd, bdc, f-prot and Trend. >> >>Gary V >> >> > That's exactly why I like having BitDefender enabled. It's cought > several of the Behaves-like virus prior to clamav, or

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Vernon A. Fort
Gary V wrote: Vernon wrote: Bill Landry wrote: - Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard setup...

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Gary V
Vernon wrote: > Bill Landry wrote: >> - Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on >>> several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, >>> standard setup... I concur, the co

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Vernon A. Fort
Bill Landry wrote: - Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard setup... postfix+amavisd-new+clamav+spamassassin I tipi

Re: [AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard setup... postfix+amavisd-new+clamav+spamassassin I tipically use 2-3 scanner

[AMaViS-user] While on the BitDefender subject

2006-01-26 Thread Vernon A. Fort
While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard setup... postfix+amavisd-new+clamav+spamassassin I tipically use 2-3 scanners on each server but the CPU load with bitdefender appears very high - usu