Mark Martinec wrote:
I'm still looking for some tests to confirm that all issues are fixed.
I should add, as a general note: the fabricated Received header field
should be the topmost Received in a file email.txt in a temporary directory
(as prepared by a helper program). It should resemble
Petr Rehor wrote:
There is a patch for testing (relative to amavisd-milter 1.2.0):
http://home.i.cz/reho/amavisd-milter/received.diff
release?
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
-
Take Surveys. Earn
Petr Rehor wrote:
There is a patch for testing (relative to amavisd-milter 1.2.0):
http://home.i.cz/reho/amavisd-milter/received.diff
Any plans for a 1.2.1 release?
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
-
At this point I'm going to say FIXED because the only things which
are broken are part of SA's trusted networks breakage, and it
requires some crafted forgery to hack through them.
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Oct 17, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Petr Rehor wrote:
There is a patch
I'm still looking for some tests to confirm that all issues are fixed.
I should add, as a general note: the fabricated Received header field
should be the topmost Received in a file email.txt in a temporary directory
(as prepared by a helper program). It should resemble the one that will later
No config option. A milter helper program (either the one supplied,
or Petr Rehor's one) does insert a faked Received header by itself
into a mail file it prepares for amavisd.
Petr Rehor writes:
Hmm. amavisd-milter doesn't do this now :-(
I guess I was wrong. I thought it is based on the
On 10/17/06, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Petr Rehor wrote:
I'm going to investigate some solutions over the weekend.
Which weekend? The weekend of 21-22? Ouch.
I'll see if I can fabricate a hack patch sooner.
There is a patch for testing (relative to amavisd-milter 1.2.0):
On Oct 17, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Petr Rehor wrote:
There is a patch for testing (relative to amavisd-milter 1.2.0):
http://home.i.cz/reho/amavisd-milter/received.diff
I can confirm that it doesn't break anything.
I'm still looking for some tests to confirm that all issues are fixed.
--
Jo Rhett
I'm still looking for some tests to confirm that all issues are fixed.
With 'amavisd debug-sa' the SA should report its analysis of Received
header fields.
Without Received from the MTA (or in case of a milter, a synthesized Received,
because the actual one hasn't yet been generated), SA would
So I've been tracking down some issues with SpamAssassin rulesets firing
and/or misfiring, and we might have stumbled on the answer.
SpamAssassin is apparently expecting that Amavis/Milter would forge a
Received: header for the current connection.
Does this jive with your understanding of
Jo,
So I've been tracking down some issues with SpamAssassin rulesets firing
and/or misfiring, and we might have stumbled on the answer.
SpamAssassin is apparently expecting that Amavis/Milter would forge a
Received: header for the current connection.
Does this jive with your understanding
11 matches
Mail list logo