On 4/19/08, MK wrote:
> At 17:59 18.04.2008, you wrote:
> >What is your hardware like and how many $max_servers are you running?
>
> $max_servers=15
>
> its a dual xeon, 2gb, scsi hw-raid (10.000 u/m)
> i dont think it is a hw issue ... like said CPU load is at 40% avg.
>
> >If you run amavisd-new
At 17:59 18.04.2008, you wrote:
>What is your hardware like and how many $max_servers are you running?
$max_servers=15
its a dual xeon, 2gb, scsi hw-raid (10.000 u/m)
i dont think it is a hw issue ... like said CPU load is at 40% avg.
>If you run amavisd-new at $log_level = 2; for a minute or so
> On a powerful system with a lot of $max_servers running, eventually
> one may reach the point where the disks can't keep up.
I think you'll first run out of RAM before this happens
Gretings Bernd
-
This SF.net email is
On 4/18/08, MK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi list,
>
> i am trying to find out at which position of my mail-processing chain
> the bottleneck is - or which parameter is maybe misconfigured...
>
> my setup is (each newest stable version)
> sendmail <-> amavisd-milter <-> amavisd-new <-> clamd/spam
hi list,
i am trying to find out at which position of my mail-processing chain
the bottleneck is - or which parameter is maybe misconfigured...
my setup is (each newest stable version)
sendmail <-> amavisd-milter <-> amavisd-new <-> clamd/spamassassin
i noticed that the number of processed messa
