Mark,
checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006.
No visible activity ever since.
Yes. That's a pitty.
Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that
connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated?
Depends what you use them for.
Hi
checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible
activity ever since.
Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that
connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated?
thanks,
John
Hi
checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible
activity ever since.
Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that
connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated?
In my own experience, I got the felling it is almost
Am 02.02.2011 18:00, schrieb Giampaolo Tomassoni:
Hi
checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible
activity ever since.
Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that
connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated?
In my own
I don't want to fight spam with p0f. My primary concern is to find out
what sort of clients connect to my MX'es and use this information for
statistical reasons. Is the detection good enough for that?
I believe it is quite good in discriminating Win from Unices.
But then, this is about a
Am 02.02.2011 20:56, schrieb Giampaolo Tomassoni:
I don't want to fight spam with p0f. My primary concern is to find out
what sort of clients connect to my MX'es and use this information for
statistical reasons. Is the detection good enough for that?
I believe it is quite good in
John,
checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006.
No visible activity ever since.
Yes. That's a pitty.
Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that
connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated?
Depends what you use them for. I
