Hello,
Am 19.11.2008 17:59 Uhr, Mark Martinec schrieb:
>> If a mail comes in through SMTP-AUTH it goes also throught amavisfeed.
>>
>> I've did this settings:
>>
>> smtpd_client_restrictions =
>> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound
>> permit_mynetworks
>> permit_sasl
Ihsan,
> I've set that up, but something is not working right:
>
> Nov 19 16:20:25 bender postfix/smtpd[27979]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
> NOQUEUE: filter: RCPT from mx1.cnd-ag.ch[82.197.176.19]:
> : Client host triggers FILTER
> amavisauth:[127.0.0.1]:10026; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to=<[EMAIL PRO
Hello Martin,
Am 19.11.2008 15:10 Uhr, Mark Martinec schrieb:
>>> Any mail which MTA will pass to a filter on port 10026 (but not on 10024)
>>> will now be eligible for DKIM signing. This is useful for mail submitted
>>> from authenticated roaming clients which have foreign IP addresses.
>>>
>>>
Ihsan,
> > Any mail which MTA will pass to a filter on port 10026 (but not on 10024)
> > will now be eligible for DKIM signing. This is useful for mail submitted
> > from authenticated roaming clients which have foreign IP addresses.
> >
> > See also:
> > http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=1226
Hello Mark,
Am 19.11.2008 13:11 Uhr, Mark Martinec schrieb:
>> DKIM works for me so far. If I send an e-mail through the webmail
>> interface, the E-Mail is signed.
>> If I send an e-mail with a regular client, which is authenticated with
>> SMTP-AUTH, the mail is not signed.
>> Is it possible to
Ihsan,
> DKIM works for me so far. If I send an e-mail through the webmail
> interface, the E-Mail is signed.
> If I send an e-mail with a regular client, which is authenticated with
> SMTP-AUTH, the mail is not signed.
> Is it possible to catch these mails as well?
'originating' flag must be on
