Be glad to John. What freq. will they be using? Times, etc?
73,
Brian
PS: You might want to re-post this event just prior to the dates
mentioned, as I will likely have a few senior moments, as will others,
between now and then!
On 9/11/06, John E. Coleman (ARS WA5BXO) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 9/3/06, Donald Chester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I think there are circuits available today for simple solid state active
filters that would be just as good.
I preceed the filter with a pre-emphasis circuit that begins a presence rise
at about 800~, and steadily rises up to about 8 dB at
Yes! Last night and early this morning were much like a preface to
what I look forward to in the Winter on 75 (and 160) meter AM. This
morning about 6:00 the noise floor here was about S-3 (abt -140dbm)
with no static crashes from lightning. Actually worked some closer
AM'ers (KA5RHK and WD5BZO
Don,
A month or so back, I sent you a screen shot of your audio spectrum
because I was so impressed about how well your brick wall filter cut
off the high end just right. I wonder if you could describe the
circuit you use to obtain the level of accuracy you have on the cutoff
freqs to the list?
Anyone have a 0-300pf and 0-1200pf (or thereabout) air variables they
would part with? I just need something that can handle around 200
watts PEP only for a small unbal (50 ohm) tuner I need to build. NIB,
or ones in good shape would be great. Please let me know off list if
you have something c
Anyone have Gary's phone # where I can reach him now? I've lost them.
Please send to me direct. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/31/06, Bob Bruhns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hopefully it's well backed-up, because there is a lot of valuable stuff in
there.
Bacon, WA3WDR
_
Yeah, I saw it. I sent Gary some little bit of info I found about the
hack that might prevent it in the future. Amazes me what it takes for
some people to get a high, not to mention the time they have on their
hands. Jerks!
On 8/31/06, Ed Sieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sure many of yo
I'd like to ask our list members to help support qsl.net which is who
operates and maintains the servers for this list and thousands of
others for amateur radio. Al Waller does this for free and is
supported only by user donations. They also provide free webspace for
hams who want to have their
I am growing VERY tired of all this bickering back and forth ON THE
LIST, as I'm very certain most the people on this list are too. We
are all going to make mistakes from time to time, and when you have
400+ members on an email list, it's likely to happen more often than
we would like. That's wh
I bought a Henry 3K Classic X from a guy off eBay a few months ago. I
paid several thousand dollars on a buy it now after discussing with
him on getting it shipped from CA to Arkansas. The deal was he would
have it professionally packed & crated for an additional $50 and the
shipping by freight
But, as Brian said, let's see what happens here. I'm done now. It's not
often that Paul and I agree on topics. Ha
A real Moment in History Pete! Now it's your turn Paul. Hi Hi!
73 Brian
1) For Sale ads WILL be permitted on the AMRadio Reflector as they
always have been so long as the ads are not for the purpose of
promoting a business in general such as "Buy cheap from Fred's
Discount BC-610 Warehouse", and the like.
2) When buying an item from a seller. Please be careful to re
On 8/13/06, Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I am rehashing a bit, but I think it would make things easirer to have the
reply button go to the originator of a message only and the Reply All button
to the originator and the list collectively? Most of us use the Reply
button almost exclus
Hi Don,
Don't give up just yet. I'll figure out something that will work well
for all involved, I hope.
I do wish you would reconsider posting your items to the amfone.net
for sale forum however. I just think there is too much duplication of
effort on the web. Too many places to look for the
Hi Jack,
I appreciate your feedback, however these rules have been put in place
for a reason, and need to be followed as they would be on any email
list. To just say "lighten up" to the admin or those who are trying
to keep the rules in place is certainly no solution over time.
Anarchy can be a
Thanks Pete! The AM Forum For Sale and Wanted forums are an excellent
place for these listings. I suggested this before and surprised that
more people don't use it for that purpose.
There is no charge or fees to become a member of the amfone.net
forums, and as Pete said, if you only want to loo
Geoff and others,
I will make a decision, hopefully this weekend, on the fate of for
sale ads on the list. I really would hate to ban them, however the
rules that have been posted over and over, and seem to be getting
pushed aside as if they don't matter. The archives do not need to be
cluttere
On 8/3/06, Don Merz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For Sale: Radio Related Books and Literature. All prices plus $2.50 US Media
Mailing.
ARRL, Operating An Amateur Radio Station, 56th ed., 1975. 50 cents plus $75
cents mailing.
Okay now... How much is that shipping? ;)
73
w5ami
I've recently ordered several pieces of equipment from the same source
that came via FedEx at various times during a month or so and each box
looked as if it hadn't even been shipped. Clean, no holes, bends or
impressions on the boxes at all. I've also had good luck with DHL
recently too.
I've
I'm not biased...the fact that I was one of the 14,000 employees laid
off by IBM in
2002 has no impact on my opinion. hi hi
I'm not sure how, but I'm sure Micro$oft fits somewhere into all this too ;)
--
"There is nothing more uncommon than common sense." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
On 7/12/06, david knepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, please attribute that saying to Benjamin Franklin and not Frank
Lloyd Wright.
Dave, W3ST
By the way Dave, I think you may be dead wrong:
www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/franklloyd127699.html
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotatio
Sorry for including all the previous text in my short reply. Gmail
does this by default and I did not catch it that time. My apologies
to the list.
--
"There is nothing more uncommon than common sense." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
OTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Radio Station W5AMI
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:18 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: [AMRadio] Re: Johnson Desk KW
No I don't Scott, but I might be able to find out. Give me a day or so...
On 7/12/06, Freeberg, Scott (STP) <[EMAIL
u have a
current email for Bill? Thanks. 73, Scott WA9WFA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Radio Station W5AMI
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:11 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Johnson Desk KW
On 7/12/06, Freeberg, Sco
On 7/12/06, Freeberg, Scott (STP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm putting my feelers out. Any Johnson Desk KW's in the
Minnesota/Wisconsin/Michigan area.
I heard someone on 3875 the other night that has one he was willing to
sell, but can't remember who he was. Bill, N4VMY would know. I don'
On 7/11/06, W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So are we, Brian. There's never a day goes by that we don't standby for
some suck... er, 'new station' who wants to come into our QSO and get
their IQ lowered. ;-)
Hurry every chance you get, but be above all, be safe.
Oh I plan to Geoff.
On 7/11/06, W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if he does Military stuff, but Dee Almquist (I think I have
name correct) does some 'excellent' work. I've seen some of his silk
screening projects (Viking II's, Rangers, some Collins stuff) and they
look better than show room read
I am looking for a BC-342N or similar to go with my BC-610E as it was
in the SCR-299 military truck, etc. This is a 115vac version. I
would consider other versions of this receiver if they are in
reasonable shape. Anyone have one, or know where I might look? Also
would be interested in knowing
On 7/6/06, Mark Foltarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1/5th! hah! Try 1/20th! Aren't KW1s going for about 20K these days?
I know BC xmtrs are going in the $1K range and less.
You're correct Mark. Miscalculations on my part. See, I'm not even
smart enough to own a KW-1.
True Todd. Still makes me wonder why a 1kw Gates or RCA (and similar)
BC units will sell for 1/5 the cost of a KW-1 these days. Not that I
want them too mind you ;) But they are certainly "brand names", and
built a lot healthier (a new term for "big iron" I made up) than a
KW-1 in my opinion.
I don't have a clue why that message will not go through John. I see
nothing odd about it.
This is strange to say the least...
On 6/24/06, John Coleman ARS WA5BXO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is really strange. I can't seem to get a certain message to go through
regarding something that D
The results of the poll on how the the header treats the reply-to
button are now in thanks to John KB6SCO.
Reply directly to list 20
Reply to originator 10
Hopefully this subject will now be closed ;)
I will change the header setup today back the way it was.
Thanks again to John for keeping up
EXACTLY! When the list is set up the old way, hitting either REPLY or REPLY-ALL
in MS-Outlook does exactly the same thing--it replies only to the list.
This is true. For whatever reason when the software is set to
reply_to_list it will not include the original poster's address.
Since we are ru
33 matches
Mail list logo
